派博傳思國際中心

標題: Titlebook: British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style; Jeremy Richardson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho [打印本頁]

作者: decoction    時間: 2025-3-21 19:21
書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style被引頻次




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style年度引用




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style讀者反饋




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: 確定的事    時間: 2025-3-21 23:56

作者: 災(zāi)禍    時間: 2025-3-22 01:17
Introduction: The Concept of Policy Style,andard operating procedures’. These changes are best characterised as a more . approach to policy-making, with a consequent reduction in the power and influence of interest groups and a general reduction in consensus, and even less anticipatory policy-making, with a shift towards a more . policy style.
作者: 填料    時間: 2025-3-22 05:35
ster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.978-3-319-90029-2
作者: 痛苦一生    時間: 2025-3-22 11:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1ce, corporatist and neo-corporatist arrangement appears to have been significantly eroded, even in countries where these arrangements were thought to be embedded. In short, there is much more government and much less governance.
作者: 繼而發(fā)生    時間: 2025-3-22 14:32

作者: moratorium    時間: 2025-3-22 19:49

作者: abreast    時間: 2025-3-22 23:07
Book 2018haracterise the British policy style. The book highlights several trends that suggest that the British policy style has shifted towards the impositional end of the policy style spectrum, bringing it more in line with the traditional Westminster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect
作者: muffler    時間: 2025-3-23 04:32
Government Without Governance: A Difficult and Risky Business?,lt of lack of proper consultation and deliberation. A means has to be found to avoid excessive interest group influence, which can lead to reform deficits, whilst mobilising the expertise which interest groups possess.
作者: 委屈    時間: 2025-3-23 08:16
Book 2018 a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.
作者: 燒烤    時間: 2025-3-23 13:03

作者: 詞匯記憶方法    時間: 2025-3-23 15:23

作者: 有花    時間: 2025-3-23 20:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1ays in which democratic nations handle similar policy problems. In the decades since then, there appears to have been a change in what were termed ‘standard operating procedures’. These changes are best characterised as a more . approach to policy-making, with a consequent reduction in the power and
作者: 以煙熏消毒    時間: 2025-3-23 22:30

作者: aristocracy    時間: 2025-3-24 02:23

作者: llibretto    時間: 2025-3-24 07:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1k of policy blunders, failures and disasters. The ‘pop-up’ policy style excludes the incorporation of key interest groups which, though of course biased, have expert knowledge. Above all they know what will work and what will not. There have been plenty of policy blunders which have arisen as a resu
作者: cravat    時間: 2025-3-24 10:52

作者: 季雨    時間: 2025-3-24 15:58

作者: 放氣    時間: 2025-3-24 20:03
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/191118.jpg
作者: VICT    時間: 2025-3-25 02:40

作者: observatory    時間: 2025-3-25 03:43

作者: 群居男女    時間: 2025-3-25 08:33

作者: 聯(lián)想記憶    時間: 2025-3-25 13:36
Government Without Governance: A Difficult and Risky Business?,k of policy blunders, failures and disasters. The ‘pop-up’ policy style excludes the incorporation of key interest groups which, though of course biased, have expert knowledge. Above all they know what will work and what will not. There have been plenty of policy blunders which have arisen as a resu
作者: Obedient    時間: 2025-3-25 16:55
Brexit and the British Policy Style: Back to Governance?,rts. The actual decision to leave is almost impossible to fit into either of the main policy-making models of UK policy-making outlined in this book. Whilst interest groups played a significant role in getting Britain into the EU, they appear to have played little or no role in getting Britain out o
作者: 用不完    時間: 2025-3-25 20:42
The British Policy Style in Transition: From Governance to Government?,ion of austerity measures (the ‘a(chǎn)usterity turn’), and the addressing of reform deficits not necessarily connected to austerity (the ‘policy reform turn’), changes in ministerial/civil service relations.
作者: Decline    時間: 2025-3-26 01:05
Brexit and the British Policy Style: Back to Governance?,y process if a whole series of policy disasters and blunders is to be avoided. Thus, the post-Brexit policy style will need to swing away from the Westminster model, back to bottom-up consensual policy-making.
作者: Euthyroid    時間: 2025-3-26 06:39

作者: COST    時間: 2025-3-26 08:41

作者: Bumble    時間: 2025-3-26 12:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1ion of austerity measures (the ‘a(chǎn)usterity turn’), and the addressing of reform deficits not necessarily connected to austerity (the ‘policy reform turn’), changes in ministerial/civil service relations.
作者: vasculitis    時間: 2025-3-26 17:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1y process if a whole series of policy disasters and blunders is to be avoided. Thus, the post-Brexit policy style will need to swing away from the Westminster model, back to bottom-up consensual policy-making.
作者: 殘酷的地方    時間: 2025-3-26 21:35
9樓
作者: 彎彎曲曲    時間: 2025-3-27 03:03
9樓
作者: amnesia    時間: 2025-3-27 06:02
9樓
作者: 侵略    時間: 2025-3-27 09:29
10樓
作者: 一大群    時間: 2025-3-27 14:54
10樓
作者: cornucopia    時間: 2025-3-27 19:43
10樓
作者: BUST    時間: 2025-3-28 00:50
10樓




歡迎光臨 派博傳思國際中心 (http://www.pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
张掖市| 体育| 林州市| 渝北区| 辽宁省| 九寨沟县| 博湖县| 弥勒县| 宁南县| 西吉县| 格尔木市| 澜沧| 察雅县| 罗定市| 张家界市| 安丘市| 永新县| 北川| 迭部县| 永城市| 徐州市| 镶黄旗| 和静县| 孙吴县| 双柏县| 武功县| 疏附县| 唐山市| 如东县| 长汀县| 井研县| 馆陶县| 房山区| 嵊泗县| 苏尼特右旗| 东海县| 依安县| 延寿县| 突泉县| 秦安县| 衡山县|