派博傳思國際中心

標題: Titlebook: British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style; Jeremy Richardson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho [打印本頁]

作者: decoction    時間: 2025-3-21 19:21
書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style被引頻次




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style年度引用




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style讀者反饋




書目名稱British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: 確定的事    時間: 2025-3-21 23:56

作者: 災(zāi)禍    時間: 2025-3-22 01:17
Introduction: The Concept of Policy Style,andard operating procedures’. These changes are best characterised as a more . approach to policy-making, with a consequent reduction in the power and influence of interest groups and a general reduction in consensus, and even less anticipatory policy-making, with a shift towards a more . policy style.
作者: 填料    時間: 2025-3-22 05:35
ster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.978-3-319-90029-2
作者: 痛苦一生    時間: 2025-3-22 11:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1ce, corporatist and neo-corporatist arrangement appears to have been significantly eroded, even in countries where these arrangements were thought to be embedded. In short, there is much more government and much less governance.
作者: 繼而發(fā)生    時間: 2025-3-22 14:32

作者: moratorium    時間: 2025-3-22 19:49

作者: abreast    時間: 2025-3-22 23:07
Book 2018haracterise the British policy style. The book highlights several trends that suggest that the British policy style has shifted towards the impositional end of the policy style spectrum, bringing it more in line with the traditional Westminster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect
作者: muffler    時間: 2025-3-23 04:32
Government Without Governance: A Difficult and Risky Business?,lt of lack of proper consultation and deliberation. A means has to be found to avoid excessive interest group influence, which can lead to reform deficits, whilst mobilising the expertise which interest groups possess.
作者: 委屈    時間: 2025-3-23 08:16
Book 2018 a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.
作者: 燒烤    時間: 2025-3-23 13:03

作者: 詞匯記憶方法    時間: 2025-3-23 15:23

作者: 有花    時間: 2025-3-23 20:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1ays in which democratic nations handle similar policy problems. In the decades since then, there appears to have been a change in what were termed ‘standard operating procedures’. These changes are best characterised as a more . approach to policy-making, with a consequent reduction in the power and
作者: 以煙熏消毒    時間: 2025-3-23 22:30

作者: aristocracy    時間: 2025-3-24 02:23

作者: llibretto    時間: 2025-3-24 07:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1k of policy blunders, failures and disasters. The ‘pop-up’ policy style excludes the incorporation of key interest groups which, though of course biased, have expert knowledge. Above all they know what will work and what will not. There have been plenty of policy blunders which have arisen as a resu
作者: cravat    時間: 2025-3-24 10:52

作者: 季雨    時間: 2025-3-24 15:58

作者: 放氣    時間: 2025-3-24 20:03
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/191118.jpg
作者: VICT    時間: 2025-3-25 02:40

作者: observatory    時間: 2025-3-25 03:43

作者: 群居男女    時間: 2025-3-25 08:33

作者: 聯(lián)想記憶    時間: 2025-3-25 13:36
Government Without Governance: A Difficult and Risky Business?,k of policy blunders, failures and disasters. The ‘pop-up’ policy style excludes the incorporation of key interest groups which, though of course biased, have expert knowledge. Above all they know what will work and what will not. There have been plenty of policy blunders which have arisen as a resu
作者: Obedient    時間: 2025-3-25 16:55
Brexit and the British Policy Style: Back to Governance?,rts. The actual decision to leave is almost impossible to fit into either of the main policy-making models of UK policy-making outlined in this book. Whilst interest groups played a significant role in getting Britain into the EU, they appear to have played little or no role in getting Britain out o
作者: 用不完    時間: 2025-3-25 20:42
The British Policy Style in Transition: From Governance to Government?,ion of austerity measures (the ‘a(chǎn)usterity turn’), and the addressing of reform deficits not necessarily connected to austerity (the ‘policy reform turn’), changes in ministerial/civil service relations.
作者: Decline    時間: 2025-3-26 01:05
Brexit and the British Policy Style: Back to Governance?,y process if a whole series of policy disasters and blunders is to be avoided. Thus, the post-Brexit policy style will need to swing away from the Westminster model, back to bottom-up consensual policy-making.
作者: Euthyroid    時間: 2025-3-26 06:39

作者: COST    時間: 2025-3-26 08:41

作者: Bumble    時間: 2025-3-26 12:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1ion of austerity measures (the ‘a(chǎn)usterity turn’), and the addressing of reform deficits not necessarily connected to austerity (the ‘policy reform turn’), changes in ministerial/civil service relations.
作者: vasculitis    時間: 2025-3-26 17:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1y process if a whole series of policy disasters and blunders is to be avoided. Thus, the post-Brexit policy style will need to swing away from the Westminster model, back to bottom-up consensual policy-making.
作者: 殘酷的地方    時間: 2025-3-26 21:35
9樓
作者: 彎彎曲曲    時間: 2025-3-27 03:03
9樓
作者: amnesia    時間: 2025-3-27 06:02
9樓
作者: 侵略    時間: 2025-3-27 09:29
10樓
作者: 一大群    時間: 2025-3-27 14:54
10樓
作者: cornucopia    時間: 2025-3-27 19:43
10樓
作者: BUST    時間: 2025-3-28 00:50
10樓




歡迎光臨 派博傳思國際中心 (http://www.pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
张掖市| 电白县| 长子县| 乌兰浩特市| 沙河市| 赤峰市| 轮台县| 光山县| 齐齐哈尔市| 广河县| 五大连池市| 乾安县| 阜宁县| 锡林浩特市| 大庆市| 东城区| 蕉岭县| 莒南县| 伊宁县| 蓬溪县| 康马县| 黄浦区| 进贤县| 绍兴县| 元氏县| 澄城县| 武定县| 海盐县| 榕江县| 鄯善县| 咸丰县| 垦利县| 南安市| 宜州市| 吴桥县| 大石桥市| 托克逊县| 大石桥市| 长岛县| 沂源县| 沂水县|