標(biāo)題: Titlebook: British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005; Paul D. Williams Book 2005 Paul D. Williams 2005 economy.European Union (EU).foreign p [打印本頁] 作者: 復(fù)雜 時間: 2025-3-21 17:01
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005被引頻次
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005年度引用
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005讀者反饋
書目名稱British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: deforestation 時間: 2025-3-21 20:13
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514690economy; European Union (EU); foreign policy; government; international relations; intervention; Policy; Br作者: Medicare 時間: 2025-3-22 00:33 作者: 煩人 時間: 2025-3-22 07:16
Educational Systems and Cultural Genocide,ed shape a world order that could produce such acts of terrorism? How closely should the UK align itself with the US in their aftermath? What roles should the UK play on the world stage and what values should guide it? What and who was UK foreign policy for? This study aims to contribute to these de作者: 無節(jié)奏 時間: 2025-3-22 12:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8071-0oceeds in three parts. The first section provides an overview of four of Labour’s most important attempts to publicly articulate its foreign policy objectives. This is followed by a discussion of the constitutive elements of the Blair government’s foreign policies in light of the Labour party’s trad作者: 無法破譯 時間: 2025-3-22 15:04 作者: 精致 時間: 2025-3-22 19:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39261-1rhaps the most remarkable, if not vote-catching, policy’ of Blair’s first term in office.. Contrary to claims that the ESDP had been dealt a fatal blow by the Iraq crisis it weathered the storm.. Although the Union’s members fell short of meeting their own optimistic targets, in 2003 ESDP took its f作者: Biofeedback 時間: 2025-3-22 22:17 作者: acquisition 時間: 2025-3-23 02:50
Segregation und soziale Benachteiligungtion. For Blair’s government, neoliberal globalisation — appropriately managed to mitigate its negative consequences — was seen as having the potential to bring unprecedented prosperity and development to both Britain and the wider world. Like their Conservative predecessors, Labour continued to pro作者: 滑稽 時間: 2025-3-23 08:32 作者: 聯(lián)想 時間: 2025-3-23 10:05 作者: 濕潤 時間: 2025-3-23 16:28 作者: saphenous-vein 時間: 2025-3-23 19:27 作者: 草本植物 時間: 2025-3-23 23:44 作者: 微生物 時間: 2025-3-24 03:09 作者: 壁畫 時間: 2025-3-24 09:28
Book 2005d Africa); and how Blair‘s government dealt with five fundamental policy issues (political economy, defence, international development, intervention, and Iraq). It argues that throughout this period Labour‘s foreign policies attempted to paper over some important contradictions.作者: 凹室 時間: 2025-3-24 13:08
Union, and Africa); and how Blair‘s government dealt with five fundamental policy issues (political economy, defence, international development, intervention, and Iraq). It argues that throughout this period Labour‘s foreign policies attempted to paper over some important contradictions.978-0-230-51469-0作者: Obliterate 時間: 2025-3-24 16:49 作者: Irksome 時間: 2025-3-24 21:03
Educational Systems and Cultural Genocide,ould the UK play on the world stage and what values should guide it? What and who was UK foreign policy for? This study aims to contribute to these debates by offering a critical analysis of the foreign policies pursued by Tony Blair’s Labour government during its first two terms in office between May 1997 and May 2005.作者: 策略 時間: 2025-3-25 03:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5215-6ments in light of the evidence presented in Parts II and III of this book. In the spirit of critical analysis outlined in the introduction, it then highlights some of the central contradictions within Labour’s foreign policies.作者: FACET 時間: 2025-3-25 07:09
Introductionould the UK play on the world stage and what values should guide it? What and who was UK foreign policy for? This study aims to contribute to these debates by offering a critical analysis of the foreign policies pursued by Tony Blair’s Labour government during its first two terms in office between May 1997 and May 2005.作者: 雕鏤 時間: 2025-3-25 08:11 作者: Notify 時間: 2025-3-25 13:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8071-0’s administration exhibited elements of both continuity and change with old Labour’s liberal internationalism. The final section suggests that the main constitutive themes of UK foreign policy under new Labour can be understood as multilateralism, Atlanticism, neoliberalism and moralism.作者: Prophylaxis 時間: 2025-3-25 18:18 作者: APO 時間: 2025-3-25 22:08 作者: 感染 時間: 2025-3-26 04:01
Understanding Labour’s Foreign Policy’s administration exhibited elements of both continuity and change with old Labour’s liberal internationalism. The final section suggests that the main constitutive themes of UK foreign policy under new Labour can be understood as multilateralism, Atlanticism, neoliberalism and moralism.作者: 結(jié)果 時間: 2025-3-26 07:54
Healing a Scar on the World’s Conscience?th taking ‘a(chǎn) fresh look at Africa’s past and present, and the international community’s role, in order to agree clear recommendations for the future’. The Commission published its report, . in March 2005.作者: 逃避責(zé)任 時間: 2025-3-26 12:14
Iraq and Labour’s Moment in the Middle Eastrious. Victory did not mean the end of violence and by 10 May 2005, 1785 coalition troops were dead, including 88 Britons and 1606 Americans, the vast majority of whom died after Bush’s declaration of victory. In a breach of Article 16 of the First Geneva Convention of 1949, the coalition made no attempt to count the number of Iraqi casualties.作者: prodrome 時間: 2025-3-26 14:03 作者: 亞麻制品 時間: 2025-3-26 16:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39261-1as given added credibility when in December 2004, the Union established EUFOR, a 7000 strong peace operation designed to take over from NATO’s Stabilisation Force in Bosnia. EUFOR involved troops from 33 states and was led by the UK, which also contributed approximately 1000 soldiers. It also provid作者: 表兩個 時間: 2025-3-26 23:54
Segregation und soziale Benachteiligung According to Mark Curtis, for instance, Labour’s intemational economic agenda represented a ‘very frightening’ attempt to break into foreign markets and organise the global economy in ways that would benefit large TNCs and a transnational business elite, and deepen poverty and inequality across the作者: 使乳化 時間: 2025-3-27 02:09
Marginalisierung, Stadt und Soziale Arbeit Britain ‘is a regional power with extensive global interests’.. These questions remained at the centre of Labour’s defence policies but especially after 9/11 greater emphasis was placed on the pragmatic issue of how best to project UK military power around the globe as part of the US-led ‘war on te作者: arrhythmic 時間: 2025-3-27 05:43 作者: Subjugate 時間: 2025-3-27 10:08 作者: 人充滿活力 時間: 2025-3-27 16:08
The Closest Allywar UK governments that had been little more than lap dogs to American power.. For the government’s supporters, its approach was simply the most prudent way to try and influence the White House in an era of unprecedented US strength..作者: stress-test 時間: 2025-3-27 21:01
Living in (and with) Europeas given added credibility when in December 2004, the Union established EUFOR, a 7000 strong peace operation designed to take over from NATO’s Stabilisation Force in Bosnia. EUFOR involved troops from 33 states and was led by the UK, which also contributed approximately 1000 soldiers. It also provid作者: 傻 時間: 2025-3-27 23:53 作者: GLEAN 時間: 2025-3-28 05:41
Defending the Realm … and the Defence Industry Britain ‘is a regional power with extensive global interests’.. These questions remained at the centre of Labour’s defence policies but especially after 9/11 greater emphasis was placed on the pragmatic issue of how best to project UK military power around the globe as part of the US-led ‘war on te作者: VAN 時間: 2025-3-28 09:10 作者: anniversary 時間: 2025-3-28 14:28
Other People’s Warsre we sure of our case? … Second, have we exhausted all diplomatic options? … Third, on the basis of a practical assessment of the situation, are there military operations we can sensibly and prudently undertake? … Fourth, are we prepared for the long term? … And finally, do we have national interes作者: 多嘴 時間: 2025-3-28 16:33
British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005作者: 管理員 時間: 2025-3-28 19:45
British Foreign Policy Under New Labour, 1997–2005978-0-230-51469-0作者: ELUDE 時間: 2025-3-29 01:58 作者: consolidate 時間: 2025-3-29 05:20 作者: 巫婆 時間: 2025-3-29 09:05 作者: committed 時間: 2025-3-29 14:12 作者: 吊胃口 時間: 2025-3-29 17:17 作者: AVANT 時間: 2025-3-29 20:13 作者: Detoxification 時間: 2025-3-30 00:42
Defending the Realm … and the Defence Industryo develop pragmatic solutions to particular problems. Not surprisingly, therefore, and with the exception of Douglas Hurd’s idea that Britain should try and punch above its weight, there have been few attempts to analyse the role of ideas in shaping UK defence policy.. This does not mean, however, t作者: 現(xiàn)任者 時間: 2025-3-30 07:50
The Right (and Prudent) Thing To Dobour, in contrast, argued that ‘Membership of the world community carries with it responsibilities as well as rights. No responsible member of the world community can accept an outcome in which much of mankind lives and dies in hunger, and in which too many children are denied their chance to grow t
