標題: Titlebook: British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy; Neoliberalism, Citiz Simon Dawes Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Aut [打印本頁] 作者: 難受 時間: 2025-3-21 19:21
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy被引頻次
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy年度引用
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy年度引用學科排名
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy讀者反饋
書目名稱British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy讀者反饋學科排名
作者: aneurysm 時間: 2025-3-22 00:09 作者: FRAX-tool 時間: 2025-3-22 03:44
La cause de l’homme: Juste un individuce and market competition. More recently, ‘public value’ has become an important rationale, whereby that entails yet greater emphasis on market competition, and a more restricted role for public service.作者: Carcinogen 時間: 2025-3-22 07:12 作者: 遠地點 時間: 2025-3-22 09:30 作者: 諄諄教誨 時間: 2025-3-22 15:21
Neoliberalization as Discursive Processrimarily, the chapter engages with the extent to which ideological and governmental approaches can be combined, and considers hybridized and relational theorizations of ‘neoliberalization’ as a discursive process.作者: Instinctive 時間: 2025-3-22 18:14
Man’s Self-Interpretation-in-Existencen studies. In particular, a more empirical, historical and processual account of both citizenship and consumption will be elaborated, which deals with active/passive and social/cultural/political forms of each, as well as their imbrication and mutual constitutiveness, without neglecting the role of power.作者: 寬敞 時間: 2025-3-23 00:57
Problems, Illustrations, History,, and of different forms of consumption, is considered through Ulrich Beck’s notion of individualization, problematizing the distinction between citizens and consumers, and between the individual and the collective. The concept of ‘voice’, as an alternative to citizenship as a normative value, is also considered.作者: 后退 時間: 2025-3-23 05:17
Book 2017ok assesses their appropriateness and efficacy by engaging with interdisciplinary debates on each concept. This work will be of particular significance to academics and students with an interest in media theory, history, policy and regulation, as well as those disposed to understanding as well as critiquing the neoliberalization of public media.?.作者: Endearing 時間: 2025-3-23 09:11 作者: 臭名昭著 時間: 2025-3-23 11:32
ublic sphere.Distinctive in covering simultaneously theoretiThis text offers a theoretical engagement with the ways in which private and public interests - and how those interests have been understood - have framed the changing rationale for broadcasting regulation, using the first century of UK bro作者: hauteur 時間: 2025-3-23 17:50 作者: Flirtatious 時間: 2025-3-23 21:45
La cause de l’homme: Juste un individure more complex debates within political philosophy are engaged with in-depth. Nineteenth- and twentieth-century debates on press freedom and public opinion, which informed Habermas’s initial development of the public sphere concept, are discussed in detail.作者: 銀版照相 時間: 2025-3-24 00:19 作者: PIZZA 時間: 2025-3-24 03:06
Mao Zedong and Contemporary China sphere, the distinction between social and political issues, and, consequently, the problems with the idea of PSB for Habermas’s model, as well as with the compatibility of a Habermasian public sphere with Marshallian citizenship, so as to elaborate a more convincing and more efficacious account of PSB’s contribution to the public sphere.作者: 存在主義 時間: 2025-3-24 06:57 作者: 一小塊 時間: 2025-3-24 13:56
Broadcasting Regulation, History and Theory on to emphasize the theoretical focus of the book on the public-private dichotomy; that is, the history of the evolving distinctions made between what is public and private in regulatory and policy documents, as well as in scholarly critique.作者: Monolithic 時間: 2025-3-24 15:27
Broadcasting and the Public Spherere more complex debates within political philosophy are engaged with in-depth. Nineteenth- and twentieth-century debates on press freedom and public opinion, which informed Habermas’s initial development of the public sphere concept, are discussed in detail.作者: 連累 時間: 2025-3-24 22:51 作者: 飛行員 時間: 2025-3-25 01:29 作者: Defiance 時間: 2025-3-25 06:34 作者: commodity 時間: 2025-3-25 10:10
Broadcasting Regulation, History and Theoryin the UK and contextualizes the appropriation of key concepts by contemporary scholars in light of earlier approaches to media critique. It then goes on to emphasize the theoretical focus of the book on the public-private dichotomy; that is, the history of the evolving distinctions made between wha作者: 教育學 時間: 2025-3-25 11:49
Genealogy, Critique and the Public-Private Dichotomys of critiquing power, in more detail. It emphasizes, in particular, the Foucauldian concern with the ways in which the public-private dichotomy has been constructed over time and explains the genealogical approach to history as a series of governmental problematizations that the book adopts.作者: Acetaldehyde 時間: 2025-3-25 16:28 作者: Mechanics 時間: 2025-3-25 21:00
Broadcasting, Citizenship and Consumptionnd undermining the former) is contrasted with an Australian creative industries perspective that is seen, by some, to embrace commercialism and consumerism. The chapter will offer a rapprochement between these two schools by engaging in debates beyond media studies in both citizenship and consumptio作者: troponins 時間: 2025-3-26 03:10 作者: configuration 時間: 2025-3-26 07:40 作者: Essential 時間: 2025-3-26 09:56
Problematizing the Public, Citizens and Consumersty to citizens and consumers will be discussed in light of much earlier debates on, for instance, the distinction between what the public want, and the what broadcasters believe they (should) want, or between what interests the public and what is in the public interest.作者: 放肆的我 時間: 2025-3-26 15:47
The Social, the Political and the Public Sphereess selective reading of public sphere theory. It also engages head-on with the controversial debates around the inclusivity/exclusivity of the public sphere, the distinction between social and political issues, and, consequently, the problems with the idea of PSB for Habermas’s model, as well as wi作者: Intend 時間: 2025-3-26 19:25 作者: 休閑 時間: 2025-3-27 00:51
Neoliberalization as Discursive Process of the neoliberalization of broadcasting in the UK that takes a long-term historical approach, and which emphasizes the various strands of neoliberal thought within regulatory documentation. This includes the neoliberal critique of advertising, and the rise of competition as an internalized princip作者: Infuriate 時間: 2025-3-27 03:35 作者: Polydipsia 時間: 2025-3-27 08:54
British Broadcasting and the Public-Private DichotomyNeoliberalism, Citiz作者: cutlery 時間: 2025-3-27 13:27
British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy978-3-319-50097-3作者: 強行引入 時間: 2025-3-27 15:34
on each concept. This work will be of particular significance to academics and students with an interest in media theory, history, policy and regulation, as well as those disposed to understanding as well as critiquing the neoliberalization of public media.?.978-3-319-84317-9978-3-319-50097-3作者: angina-pectoris 時間: 2025-3-27 21:00 作者: 做作 時間: 2025-3-27 22:40
Yun Liu,Yi Zhou,Hanzhou Qiu,Liming Shens of critiquing power, in more detail. It emphasizes, in particular, the Foucauldian concern with the ways in which the public-private dichotomy has been constructed over time and explains the genealogical approach to history as a series of governmental problematizations that the book adopts.作者: 證實 時間: 2025-3-28 05:50 作者: 最高峰 時間: 2025-3-28 07:39 作者: 飛行員 時間: 2025-3-28 13:09 作者: 大都市 時間: 2025-3-28 14:53
La cause de l’homme: Juste un individu British broadcasting as a public service was the debate over the appropriate balance between the need for ‘public’ (i.e. state) control over broadcasting and the need for an element of private enterprise, as well as arguments over the necessity of press freedom. The chapter will go on to demonstrat作者: 轉向 時間: 2025-3-28 20:34
,Mao’s Methodology and Point of Departure,ty to citizens and consumers will be discussed in light of much earlier debates on, for instance, the distinction between what the public want, and the what broadcasters believe they (should) want, or between what interests the public and what is in the public interest.作者: amygdala 時間: 2025-3-29 02:05
Mao Zedong and Contemporary Chinaess selective reading of public sphere theory. It also engages head-on with the controversial debates around the inclusivity/exclusivity of the public sphere, the distinction between social and political issues, and, consequently, the problems with the idea of PSB for Habermas’s model, as well as wi作者: 雇傭兵 時間: 2025-3-29 04:19
Problems, Illustrations, History, account of citizenship and consumption in broadcasting regulation, which acknowledges their respective problems and political potentialities, is proposed to shift debate away from a moralistic versus economistic/relativist debate. Consequently, a processual account of different forms of citizenship