標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Britain’s War Powers; The Fall and Rise of Tara McCormack Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licenc [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: sustained 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:26
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers年度引用
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱Britain’s War Powers讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 譏笑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:04 作者: Melanocytes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:32 作者: laparoscopy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13682-6War Powers Act; British politics; British Syrian strikes; prime minister powers; executive powers; legisl作者: 去才蔑視 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:32 作者: magnate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:59 作者: GEON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:46 作者: cunning 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:27
Conceptualising Securitisation,n on authorising war. The chapter then analyses the way in which the Royal Prerogative became a political concern in the post-Cold War and the problem of legitimacy that was faced by post-Cold War British governments.作者: 搖曳 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:00 作者: somnambulism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3372-9reasons put forward by May for not consulting Parliament including the legal basis for the strikes put forward by the government. In conclusion, I argue that the justification for ignoring the new Parliamentary Convention was very weak. An overview of the justifications given and the reality of the 作者: Arresting 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:12 作者: indifferent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:56 作者: 險(xiǎn)代理人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:02 作者: 難管 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:58 作者: hallow 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:09 作者: insecticide 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3372-92018 suggests a democratic deficit at the heart of the British polity. Legislative control is only as good as the political will of the legislature. The British Parliament has to make a decision to play its constitutional role as the sovereign power in the state, a sovereign power that represents and acts on behalf of the citizens of the state.作者: Acclaim 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:39 作者: diskitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:11
,The Executive Strikes Back? The Rise and Fall of Britain’s Parliamentary War Powers,he changing locus of British war powers. This literature is part of a larger field engaging with executive–legislative relations and foreign and security policy. The second part of the chapter gives an overview of the rest of the work and of the main arguments therein.作者: Reclaim 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:17 作者: 神圣在玷污 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:42 作者: dandruff 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:20 作者: 小說(shuō) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:07
The Rise of the Parliamentary Convention on Authorising War; a Done Deal or an Uncertain Political d Cameron went to Parliament to ask for authorisation to participate in military action in Syria it was widely held in Britain that a new Parliamentary Convention on authorising war had been established. However, as analysts noted, there was much that remained unclear about the convention, for example, the exact scope.作者: Lacerate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:21 作者: FOR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:15
,The Executive Strikes Back? The Rise and Fall of Britain’s Parliamentary War Powers, to non-existent. This is fundamentally a problem of political will. The legislature failed in April 2018 to assert its rights even retrospectively. The fall and rise of the Royal Prerogative can be understood in the context of the declining authority of the executive . a legislature that does not w作者: Esalate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:12 作者: allude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:09 作者: subacute 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:52
Syria and the Return of the Royal Prerogative?,reasons put forward by May for not consulting Parliament including the legal basis for the strikes put forward by the government. In conclusion, I argue that the justification for ignoring the new Parliamentary Convention was very weak. An overview of the justifications given and the reality of the 作者: Encumber 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:42
British War Powers in Context and Conclusion,r Germany and France. The second and final part of the chapter concludes the work. The work will argue that the convention needs to be put on a far more formal basis, for example statutory. However, the failure to even retrospectively criticise the government’s refusal to recall Parliament in April 作者: 性滿足 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:16
8樓作者: 財(cái)主 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:51
9樓作者: Abrupt 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:23
9樓作者: 詼諧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:06
9樓作者: negligence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:28
9樓作者: Fillet,Filet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:42
10樓作者: 執(zhí)拗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:56
10樓作者: OVERT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:48
10樓作者: convert 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:23
10樓
