標題: Titlebook: Bourdieu and Marx; Practices of Critiqu Gabriella Paolucci Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen [打印本頁] 作者: T-cell 時間: 2025-3-21 18:55
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx被引頻次
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx年度引用
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx讀者反饋
書目名稱Bourdieu and Marx讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: hematuria 時間: 2025-3-21 22:12
Bourdieu with Marx, from Economy to Ecologyl capital” designates a second component of the dominant class: a “competence capital,” endowed with its own mode of structural reproduction. Beyond its social and political relevance, this analysis reveals the immense ecological impact in terms of productivism and consumerism of this “other front.”作者: AGATE 時間: 2025-3-22 03:18
Violence, Symbolic Violence and the Decivilizing Process: Approaches from Marx, Elias and Bourdieution of violence..The distinctive French route to capitalism has continued to be a major issue in Marxist and historical sociological discussion, notably in the Brenner (Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe: The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism. In The Bren作者: ornithology 時間: 2025-3-22 07:42
Putting Marx in the Dock: Practice of Logic and Logic of the Practiceurdieu’s theoretical and empirical work stands the analysis of the nature of domination and the mechanisms by which it reproduces social structures and makes them acceptable. The role played by the habitus and the body becomes increasingly central in Bourdieu’s theory of domination and is pivotal in作者: 厚臉皮 時間: 2025-3-22 10:43
The Poverty of Philosophy: Marx Meets Bourdieuhat Bourdieu calls scholastic reason. Marx and Bourdieu both identify the source of this fallacy in the failure of philosophers (and other intellectuals or academics) to recognize the peculiar conditions under which they produce their knowledge. Accordingly both Marx and Bourdieu turn from the logic作者: THE 時間: 2025-3-22 16:03
Marx/Bourdieu: Convergences and Tensions, Between Critical Sociology and Philosophy of Emancipationatory hermeneutics of theoretical texts, which breaks with the presupposition of coherency of “works” and “authors” in the wake of Michel Foucault’s warnings in . (1969). By dissociating the concepts and methods from the “works” from which they are derived, our ambition is to create renewed “sparks 作者: Assault 時間: 2025-3-22 17:18 作者: 音樂學(xué)者 時間: 2025-3-22 22:00 作者: 細頸瓶 時間: 2025-3-23 03:34 作者: 摻和 時間: 2025-3-23 07:10 作者: 離開就切除 時間: 2025-3-23 10:04
Bourdieu, Marx, and the Economyhis distance from Marxist economic theorizing, as he did, moreover, with those operated in the two other great economic “paradigms”: neoclassical and Keynesian, but also various theoretical traditions, which he saw as toolboxes more than reference spaces in which he would navigate. Early reader of .作者: Condyle 時間: 2025-3-23 16:50
Marx and Bourdieu: From the Economy to the Economies other intellectual debts and footprints. First of all, the paper briefly notes the international context of the Marx-Bourdieu relation and references this debate in Latin America..Subsequently, the article presents the central features of the Bourdieusian “economy of practices” pointing out the lin作者: headlong 時間: 2025-3-23 19:50
Bourdieu, Marxism and Law: Between Radical Criticism and Political Responsibilityof Althusser and Thompson. Firstly, it shows Bourdieu’s relationship with Marx through a case of misinterpretation concerning practical obedience to law. Then it tries to highlight how Bourdieu develops certain features of his sociology in opposition to and in dialogue with Althusser and Thompson, p作者: Anal-Canal 時間: 2025-3-24 02:03 作者: 友好關(guān)系 時間: 2025-3-24 05:07
Bourdieu’s Lesson: Marx vs. Althusser?ence. This essay aims to analyse, from a rhetorical and political point of view—because this is the level on which the two speeches under examination are built—one of the moments of harshest criticism that Bourdieu addressed to Althusser. A critique that Bourdieu formulated in 1975, starting from th作者: Benzodiazepines 時間: 2025-3-24 09:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8570-8exts of Marx. It shows some overlap but considerable divergence in Bourdieu’s idea that states attempt to monopolize the means of symbolic violence, which for Bourdieu, more than for Marx, is key to controlling the social order. And it offers some intellectual field perspectives on the way Bourdieu relates to Marx’s texts.作者: COMMA 時間: 2025-3-24 14:26 作者: Culmination 時間: 2025-3-24 16:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-937-0represents Bourdieu’s constant dialectical reference. Once foregrounded these two aspects, religion will appear not just as an essential element in the definition of Bourdieu’s notion of field, but also as an object of permanent critique because it is the foundation of every critique of society and its structures.作者: blight 時間: 2025-3-24 20:29 作者: Coeval 時間: 2025-3-25 02:29
Bourdieu, Marxism and Law: Between Radical Criticism and Political Responsibility1990s in favour of public service and Welfare State. Indeed, it shows a Marxian ancestry in the constant concern to link the analysis and critique of normativity to power relations and social struggles, as emerges from the confrontation between Bourdieu and the Durkheimian-derived juridical perspectives.作者: 最初 時間: 2025-3-25 05:54
If Theodicy is Always Sociodicy: Bourdieu and the Marxian Critique of Religionrepresents Bourdieu’s constant dialectical reference. Once foregrounded these two aspects, religion will appear not just as an essential element in the definition of Bourdieu’s notion of field, but also as an object of permanent critique because it is the foundation of every critique of society and its structures.作者: 率直 時間: 2025-3-25 09:22 作者: 遷移 時間: 2025-3-25 12:11
2524-7123 tion that Bourdieu practiced with regard to Marx.Devoted to This new book gathers together essays concerning the strategic modes of appropriation that Bourdieu practiced with regard to Marx, together with their various outcomes.?It is especially devoted to the practice of critique that both thinkers作者: terazosin 時間: 2025-3-25 18:36
Phouthone Keohavong,Y. Peter Dictive forces.” As a result, it contributes to broadening the programme of “historical materialism,” but cannot replace it. It is in fact situated on the generic terrain of a “praxeology” and not on that of a theory of history.作者: TEM 時間: 2025-3-25 20:26
Miscellaneous Pulmonary Diseasee; capital and capitals; the denial of the economy; the legitimacy of domination and the symbolic violence; and the field as a game space..Finally, the chapter reasserts the central argument to remember the analytical value of Bourdieu’s economy of practices, a condition we take as a “toolbox.”作者: 防御 時間: 2025-3-26 02:49 作者: Amendment 時間: 2025-3-26 04:54
Marx and Bourdieu: From the Economy to the Economiese; capital and capitals; the denial of the economy; the legitimacy of domination and the symbolic violence; and the field as a game space..Finally, the chapter reasserts the central argument to remember the analytical value of Bourdieu’s economy of practices, a condition we take as a “toolbox.”作者: LVAD360 時間: 2025-3-26 09:54 作者: 正常 時間: 2025-3-26 16:26
Violence, Symbolic Violence and the Decivilizing Process: Approaches from Marx, Elias and Bourdieuury court aristocracy, transmitted to the urban bourgeoisie and then ultimately to the popular classes. Bourdieu, in his turn, addressed such an Eliasian “civilizing process” in various works, whilst emphasizing not just the State monopoly of violent power but also of symbolic power. Further, in his作者: 通知 時間: 2025-3-26 19:01
Putting Marx in the Dock: Practice of Logic and Logic of the Practice from . onwards, when he breaks with the idealist conception of the philosophical criticism and begins to develop a thought aimed at defining the features of a theory of practical transformation of the world, we realise that the Bourdieusian criticism is groundless. For Marx, emancipatory proletaria作者: Metastasis 時間: 2025-3-26 22:24
The Poverty of Philosophy: Marx Meets Bourdieuturns away from the dominated as a source of social change and back to intellectuals and the realpolitik of reason which calls on the state and law to realize their claims to universality. Similarly, the failure of working-class revolution leads Marx to return to the logic of theory—the theory of th作者: Retrieval 時間: 2025-3-27 03:59
Marx/Bourdieu: Convergences and Tensions, Between Critical Sociology and Philosophy of Emancipation” and Marx’s hesitations between economism and constructivism are compared. The third field concerns the theory of praxis between the sociology of action and revolutionary politics. The fourth field concerns the political philosophy of emancipation, important in Marx’s approach, present but more mar作者: 書法 時間: 2025-3-27 07:36 作者: 進取心 時間: 2025-3-27 12:06 作者: 透明 時間: 2025-3-27 14:15 作者: fructose 時間: 2025-3-27 18:20 作者: mercenary 時間: 2025-3-28 01:44
Bourdieu’s Lesson: Marx vs. Althusser?e first aim of this essay is to show that Bourdieu’s critique is in turn contradictory because he does exactly what he reproaches to Althusser, that is, he poses himself, in turn, as the unique and authentic interpreter of Marx’s text. The second purpose of the essay is to analyse Althusser’s respon作者: 確定無疑 時間: 2025-3-28 02:35 作者: diathermy 時間: 2025-3-28 08:27
Sumita B. Khatri,Emily J. Penningtonhilosopher that the sociologist scatters throughout his works, and by the adoption of a critical perspective that denotes a massive Marxian presence. In the concatenated set of critiques underpinning the architecture of his work, in the plethora of questions he raises, and in the scientific practice作者: 報復(fù) 時間: 2025-3-28 13:03
Inflammatory Pathways in Sarcoidosis,ury court aristocracy, transmitted to the urban bourgeoisie and then ultimately to the popular classes. Bourdieu, in his turn, addressed such an Eliasian “civilizing process” in various works, whilst emphasizing not just the State monopoly of violent power but also of symbolic power. Further, in his作者: 清洗 時間: 2025-3-28 17:24 作者: sundowning 時間: 2025-3-28 20:59
Beata Kosmider,Robert J. Mason,Karim Bahmedturns away from the dominated as a source of social change and back to intellectuals and the realpolitik of reason which calls on the state and law to realize their claims to universality. Similarly, the failure of working-class revolution leads Marx to return to the logic of theory—the theory of th作者: 語源學(xué) 時間: 2025-3-28 23:49
William McKleroy,Kenneth Lyn-Kew” and Marx’s hesitations between economism and constructivism are compared. The third field concerns the theory of praxis between the sociology of action and revolutionary politics. The fourth field concerns the political philosophy of emancipation, important in Marx’s approach, present but more mar作者: 平息 時間: 2025-3-29 04:19 作者: 解脫 時間: 2025-3-29 08:32 作者: bibliophile 時間: 2025-3-29 12:40 作者: 紳士 時間: 2025-3-29 16:16 作者: Scintillations 時間: 2025-3-29 20:27 作者: Isthmus 時間: 2025-3-30 01:20 作者: phytochemicals 時間: 2025-3-30 07:53 作者: 甜得發(fā)膩 時間: 2025-3-30 10:34
978-3-031-06291-9The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: ATRIA 時間: 2025-3-30 15:32 作者: Capture 時間: 2025-3-30 20:29
Marx, Engels, and Marxismshttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/190079.jpg作者: FAST 時間: 2025-3-30 23:20 作者: 繞著哥哥問 時間: 2025-3-31 03:52
Phouthone Keohavong,Y. Peter Dil capital” designates a second component of the dominant class: a “competence capital,” endowed with its own mode of structural reproduction. Beyond its social and political relevance, this analysis reveals the immense ecological impact in terms of productivism and consumerism of this “other front.”作者: OUTRE 時間: 2025-3-31 06:05 作者: 輕率看法 時間: 2025-3-31 11:15
