標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Bioscience, Governance and Politics; John Gillott Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 interview. [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: mountebank 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:33
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics年度引用
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bioscience, Governance and Politics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 聰明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:28
Jetpack, LiveData, ViewModel, and Room,consideration of the substance of governance I modify the first point to consider the less dramatic but probably more significant point that, in contemporary discourse and governance research as an activity has been singled out for particular, and particularly critical, attention. Relatedly, I exten作者: 密碼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:57 作者: AXIOM 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:13
Engagement, Pluralism, Deliberation, Embryos and Research,ecades later, led the call in the early 1980s for an outside chair to be appointed to a committee to investigate IVF and embryo research. This duly happened with the appointment of Mary Warnock to the position. As Wilson argues:作者: Cougar 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:34 作者: Jocose 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:02 作者: Visual-Acuity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:43 作者: travail 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:16
Learn Android Studio 3 with Kotlinwidely. A critical engagement with the debates within and about STS (Science and Technology Studies) and SSK in this chapter is used to highlight the distinctive approach taken by critical STS and SSK to governance and to discuss some key features of contemporary debate on governance and politics of bioscience research.作者: Limousine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:20
Jetpack, LiveData, ViewModel, and Room,o explore governance. Beyond SSK, a novel reading and combination of Erving Goffman and (more critically) John Rawls is used to interrogate the performative work of natural scientists who were drawn into public engagement and deliberative exercises during the New Labour years.作者: callous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:47
,SSK’s Challenge to Natural Science Governance,widely. A critical engagement with the debates within and about STS (Science and Technology Studies) and SSK in this chapter is used to highlight the distinctive approach taken by critical STS and SSK to governance and to discuss some key features of contemporary debate on governance and politics of bioscience research.作者: 尾隨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:29 作者: epicondylitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:17 作者: Diaphragm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5937-5Investigation for this book was guided by these two questions:作者: 取消 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:52
Theorising Governance, Politics and Change,In Chapter 1 I stated that governance is a broad topic, and that it might be appropriate to use different conceptualisations in different contexts. I quoted Andy Stirling distinguishing between appraisal and commitment while advocating for the following broad approach when focusing on opening up debates:作者: 史前 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:09 作者: erythema 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:14
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/188530.jpg作者: patriot 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:54 作者: 頌揚(yáng)本人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:52
978-1-349-47718-0Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014作者: blight 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:04
anding of change in governance of bioscience research. In particular it examines change as it is shaped by approaches developed by Science and Technology Studies and Sociology of Scientific Knowledge theorists.978-1-349-47718-0978-1-137-37499-8作者: cajole 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:11 作者: NICHE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:22 作者: ANTI 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:41 作者: 青少年 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:47
Jetpack, LiveData, ViewModel, and Room,es from the perspective of some of the participants and discussed some of the work of some academics who have written on the issue. Broadly speaking I have focused on the discourse around human tissue. In this chapter I move to a more substantive discussion of: underlying philosophical, social and l作者: 值得 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:01
Jetpack, LiveData, ViewModel, and Room,ritain’, ‘to the central role that putative bioethi-cists played in . and . the demand for bioethics in Britain, as much as they reacted to it’ (Wilson, 2011, p. 124). Ian Kennedy, who as we saw in the last chapter, went on to play a role in the generation of the retained organs scandal nearly two d作者: meritorious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:05 作者: 擴(kuò)張 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:20
,SSK’s Challenge to Natural Science Governance,h governance structures and practices. In turn, the general thinking on governance prevalent at the time, to a greater or lesser degree, will influence the politics and governance of particular areas of research. Governance of bioscience research is intrinsically connected with the wider trends in t作者: 補(bǔ)角 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:50
The Changing Governance of Science?,ocus on some aspects of natural scientists’ perceptions of the changes that have taken place in the more recent period and how they have tried to influence and manage change. This discussion includes some preliminary observations on the ways in which the interaction of new and old approaches to gove作者: xanthelasma 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:13
Precautionary Governance, Participation, Engagement, Tissue and Research,es from the perspective of some of the participants and discussed some of the work of some academics who have written on the issue. Broadly speaking I have focused on the discourse around human tissue. In this chapter I move to a more substantive discussion of: underlying philosophical, social and l作者: 大雨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:51
Engagement, Pluralism, Deliberation, Embryos and Research,ritain’, ‘to the central role that putative bioethi-cists played in . and . the demand for bioethics in Britain, as much as they reacted to it’ (Wilson, 2011, p. 124). Ian Kennedy, who as we saw in the last chapter, went on to play a role in the generation of the retained organs scandal nearly two d作者: handle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:13
8樓作者: 誘導(dǎo) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:53
8樓作者: DECRY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:58
9樓作者: flex336 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:32
9樓作者: CUB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:57
9樓作者: 朝圣者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:23
9樓作者: 絕種 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:24
10樓作者: 貝雷帽 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:01
10樓作者: Antarctic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:12
10樓作者: 拋物線 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:26
10樓
