標題: Titlebook: Beyond Legal Positivism; The Moral Authority Whitley R. P. Kaufman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus [打印本頁] 作者: 機會 時間: 2025-3-21 19:47
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism網絡公開度
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism網絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism被引頻次
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism年度引用
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism讀者反饋
書目名稱Beyond Legal Positivism讀者反饋學科排名
作者: CANE 時間: 2025-3-22 00:02 作者: 開玩笑 時間: 2025-3-22 04:09
Beyond Legal Positivism978-3-031-43868-4Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315 作者: IOTA 時間: 2025-3-22 06:19 作者: 監(jiān)禁 時間: 2025-3-22 10:32 作者: Fibroid 時間: 2025-3-22 14:20 作者: 起草 時間: 2025-3-22 19:52
978-3-031-43870-7The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: Anticonvulsants 時間: 2025-3-23 00:50 作者: Largess 時間: 2025-3-23 02:44
Journalism Theories in Media Studies,ual analysis,’ a technique that identifies the necessary conceptual properties of law. We make the case that there is no good reason to believe in any such method, nor its claims to be uncovering ‘conceptual’ truths about the law.作者: inculpate 時間: 2025-3-23 06:26
Classifying International Normative Orders, law and morality, whether that be expressed through the Separability Thesis or the Social Fact Thesis (that law is a matter of social fact, not moral truth). We show how this doctrine is the fatal weakness of legal positivism, for it renders the theory unable to explain the concept of legal obligat作者: 過渡時期 時間: 2025-3-23 11:10 作者: 巧思 時間: 2025-3-23 17:52 作者: SEVER 時間: 2025-3-23 18:20
Only Net Zero Scenario Matters,s the flaws of legal positivism in that movement’s desire to make a ‘science’ of legal philosophy and also to avoid any entanglement in moral or political theory, given its inclination towards moral relativism. But if moral relativism is true, then the very project of law is incoherent; law is merel作者: GNAT 時間: 2025-3-24 01:36 作者: 誘拐 時間: 2025-3-24 05:08 作者: Cirrhosis 時間: 2025-3-24 09:44
1572-4395 ner accessible to the non-specialist, while still addressing.Legal Positivism has been the dominant school of legal philosophy for much of the last century, despite its many critics. Its central tenet has long been that there is no necessary connection between law and morality. This book provides a 作者: DUCE 時間: 2025-3-24 14:24 作者: 歡樂中國 時間: 2025-3-24 18:54
The Problem of Legal Authority, truth). We show how this doctrine is the fatal weakness of legal positivism, for it renders the theory unable to explain the concept of legal obligation. Without some connection to morality, law can only take the form of coercion not obligation.作者: 粘土 時間: 2025-3-24 20:00 作者: 愛管閑事 時間: 2025-3-25 02:31
Only Net Zero Scenario Matters,y the application of force, and no justification can be presented for it. There is then no way to avoid the connection between law and morality: law is an institution that is defined by its moral aim, and its authority is grounded in its capacity to achieve that aim.作者: CEDE 時間: 2025-3-25 04:29
OPEC in the Age of Climate Change,t doctrines as normative, we can engage in a genuine debate about the ideals that a legal system should pursue, instead of the current situation in which legal positivists present their normative preferences in the forms of necessary conceptual truths.作者: Adj異類的 時間: 2025-3-25 10:57
Normative Legal Positivism,t doctrines as normative, we can engage in a genuine debate about the ideals that a legal system should pursue, instead of the current situation in which legal positivists present their normative preferences in the forms of necessary conceptual truths.作者: 過分 時間: 2025-3-25 12:18
Book 2023been that there is no necessary connection between law and morality. This book provides a broad but clear and jargon-free account of the central objections to the theory and why those objections are sufficient to show that legal positivism is no longer tenable. This includes a broad critique of the 作者: Incorporate 時間: 2025-3-25 19:39
The Function of Law,way to explain and understand a human artifact like law is not in terms of ‘essences’ or necessary properties but in terms of its purpose. The aim of law is to establish a single, comprehensive moral code with which a society can organize itself.作者: Intact 時間: 2025-3-25 21:29 作者: Congregate 時間: 2025-3-26 03:00
Book 2023ool arises from a caricatured account of that doctrine, for instance the idea that it requires substantive theological commitments or particular conceptions of human nature. In contrast, the author presents an account of natural law theory that is grounded in a commitment to moral truth, but not to 作者: 套索 時間: 2025-3-26 06:05 作者: 搖晃 時間: 2025-3-26 11:51 作者: 隱語 時間: 2025-3-26 14:14 作者: Judicious 時間: 2025-3-26 20:47
The Problem of Legal Authority, law and morality, whether that be expressed through the Separability Thesis or the Social Fact Thesis (that law is a matter of social fact, not moral truth). We show how this doctrine is the fatal weakness of legal positivism, for it renders the theory unable to explain the concept of legal obligat作者: 失望昨天 時間: 2025-3-26 21:53 作者: SAGE 時間: 2025-3-27 02:43
Normative Legal Positivism,een presented many times before, including by Lon Fuller and Jeremy Waldron. That is, when its ‘conceptual’ claims are reinterpreted as normative ones—ideals by which legal systems should be structured—then the theory makes far more sense. That is not to say it is correct as a normative theory; lega作者: 創(chuàng)作 時間: 2025-3-27 06:49
Conclusion,s the flaws of legal positivism in that movement’s desire to make a ‘science’ of legal philosophy and also to avoid any entanglement in moral or political theory, given its inclination towards moral relativism. But if moral relativism is true, then the very project of law is incoherent; law is merel作者: orthodox 時間: 2025-3-27 11:23
9樓作者: 使無效 時間: 2025-3-27 15:29
10樓作者: Spinal-Fusion 時間: 2025-3-27 18:27
10樓作者: 門閂 時間: 2025-3-28 01:44
10樓作者: Infant 時間: 2025-3-28 04:23
10樓
