標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Beyond Just War; A Virtue Ethics Appr David K. Chan Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012 ethics.Ju [打印本頁] 作者: detumescence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:52
書目名稱Beyond Just War影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Beyond Just War影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beyond Just War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Beyond Just War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beyond Just War被引頻次
書目名稱Beyond Just War被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beyond Just War年度引用
書目名稱Beyond Just War年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beyond Just War讀者反饋
書目名稱Beyond Just War讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: BOLT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:56 作者: 案發(fā)地點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:43
Just War Reconsidered,acceptable, including violence used to defend one’s life or the lives of those that one loves. On the face of it, this is rather implausible. In the context of the ethics of war, the question arises of what, for instance, a pacifist in Britain would do to stop Hitler from invading Britain and spread作者: Aboveboard 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:03 作者: 陶器 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:34 作者: Ibd810 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39460-2acceptable, including violence used to defend one’s life or the lives of those that one loves. On the face of it, this is rather implausible. In the context of the ethics of war, the question arises of what, for instance, a pacifist in Britain would do to stop Hitler from invading Britain and spread作者: 金盤是高原 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:58 作者: 不能妥協(xié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:14 作者: Phenothiazines 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39460-2d to the theory is pacifism: the view that war is always morally wrong. There are two ways to get from just war theory to pacifism. One is to take as fundamentally correct the view that war is morally wrong and, therefore, unjustifiable. So even if the conditions of just war theory are satisfied, it作者: 異端邪說2 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39460-2radition are concerned with justifying what is done in war in terms of rights and duties. Thus, one may think, for instance, that one should reexamine what the right of self-defense and the duty not to kill innocent people involves. Other moral theories, for example utilitarianism, treat rights and 作者: 含糊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:36 作者: 異端邪說2 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:02 作者: 臭名昭著 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:00
,“Confidence, Self-Image, Self-Esteem”,dealing with the kinds of violence common in today’s world? Proponents of just war theory have attempted to amend just war theory to account for the challenges of humanitarian intervention, terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. New versions of just war theory have been proposed for unconvention作者: 不成比例 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:53 作者: 脫落 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31045-5The philosophy of co-existence that I proposed in the last chapter as an alternative to both just war theories and pacifism will draw many objections. In this chapter, I will address some likely objections that are theoretical in nature.作者: Encoding 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:24 作者: 組裝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:55
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/185211.jpg作者: Crayon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:25
Book 2012Unlike most books on the ethics of war, this book rejects the ‘just war‘ tradition, proposing a virtue ethics of war to take its place. Like torture, war cannot be justified. It answers the question: ‘If war is a very great evil, would a leader with courage, justice, compassion, and all the other moral virtues ever choose to fight a war?‘作者: 致敬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:27 作者: 舉止粗野的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:28 作者: 一起平行 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:02
torture, war cannot be justified. It answers the question: ‘If war is a very great evil, would a leader with courage, justice, compassion, and all the other moral virtues ever choose to fight a war?‘978-1-349-99986-6978-1-137-26341-4作者: Arthritis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:41
Does a Research Position Count?on to ask is whether it could be a lesser evil to torture than to allow some other great evil. Some would answer “no,” but even those who answer “yes” have to regret the evil they do and be required to make amends or accept punishment for doing evil, even if what they do is the lesser evil.作者: 大吃大喝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:41 作者: Cubicle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:45 作者: nonplus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:48 作者: 松軟無力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:35
torture, war cannot be justified. It answers the question: ‘If war is a very great evil, would a leader with courage, justice, compassion, and all the other moral virtues ever choose to fight a war?‘978-1-349-99986-6978-1-137-26341-4作者: painkillers 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:12
Nidhi Shankar Kikkeri,Shivaraj Nagallieliminate through war? And how does anyone provide rational and morally justified answers to these questions? In this chapter, I will propose answers that are different from those that have been used in the ethics of war.作者: 使入迷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:37
The Philosophy of Co-existence,eliminate through war? And how does anyone provide rational and morally justified answers to these questions? In this chapter, I will propose answers that are different from those that have been used in the ethics of war.作者: 不能平靜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:55 作者: malapropism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:11 作者: Distribution 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:37 作者: gonioscopy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:55 作者: 表被動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:36 作者: Hot-Flash 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:18
The Moral Problem of War,of religious, philosophical, and legal thinking that began in the ancient Western world concerning the justification(s) for the use of force by a state or leader against another state or leader. It has become convenient for ethicists, jurists, and political leaders today to simply appeal to the tene作者: PANT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:16
Just War Reconsidered,d to the theory is pacifism: the view that war is always morally wrong. There are two ways to get from just war theory to pacifism. One is to take as fundamentally correct the view that war is morally wrong and, therefore, unjustifiable. So even if the conditions of just war theory are satisfied, it作者: 惡臭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:48 作者: 不知疲倦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:13
War as an Evil,met, and war could be chosen as a morally acceptable means to achieve justified ends. If war is recognized as intrinsically evil, then the deliberate choice of war could not be justified in the way that just war theory attempts to do. Take for comparison how torture of human beings is intrinsically 作者: Enervate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:01 作者: 薄膜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:30
Practical Implications and Challenges,dealing with the kinds of violence common in today’s world? Proponents of just war theory have attempted to amend just war theory to account for the challenges of humanitarian intervention, terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. New versions of just war theory have been proposed for unconvention作者: Shuttle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:21 作者: Dawdle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:30
IP Data Delivery in HBB-Next Network Architecture ns2 network simulator to verify our solution. Results of SPN model simulation and ns2 network simulation are discussed and HEP protocol is compared to existing encapsulation protocols used in DVB systems.作者: vasospasm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:08 作者: Flavouring 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:34 作者: 因無茶而冷淡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:09 作者: Reservation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:21 作者: slow-wave-sleep 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:00 作者: 高興去去 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:43
Eleni Kasselouri-Hatzivassiliadil psychology and thereby degrades the scientific understanding of psychology as well as its emancipatory insights into political change..We explain how macro-cultural psychology reflects Darwin’s ecological explanation of species’ anatomical characteristics.
