標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Beyond Economics; Happiness as a Stand Jan Ott Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 happiness.wellbeing.policy-ma [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 頌歌 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:49
書目名稱Beyond Economics影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Beyond Economics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beyond Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Beyond Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beyond Economics被引頻次
書目名稱Beyond Economics被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beyond Economics年度引用
書目名稱Beyond Economics年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beyond Economics讀者反饋
書目名稱Beyond Economics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: canvass 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:58
,Happiness as a Descriptive Standard or?as a Standard to be Pursued,onfusion about happiness has been reduced, in view of the current definition and results of research. Decisions to use happiness as a descriptive standard, or as a standard to be pursued, are not value-free. Before we decide we should have a brief look at possible tensions with alternative standards.作者: anatomical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:37
Book 2020duce this confusion, to make the deliberations and discussions about happiness more productive. A reduction of confusion will also make it easier to assesshappiness as a possible standard in our personal life and in politics. Acceptance of happiness as a standard will have positive effects. Acceptan作者: PAD416 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:02
s economics, policy, philosophy and sociology.Makes specific.There is a lot of attention for happiness, but there is also a lot of confusion, about the concept and the nature of happiness. This book wants to reduce this confusion, to make the deliberations and discussions about happiness more produc作者: Glossy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:57
Kostas Kampourakis,Ross H. Nehmome perfect state and it is not the same as utility. Individuals may adopt very different standards, and theoretically, this can lead to incomparability of happiness of different individuals. People may also adopt egocentric or immoral standards. Happiness is dualistic because it depends on two comp作者: 觀察 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:03
Ross H. Nehm,Kostas Kampourakisng. There are some conceptual complications. In colloquial language people are supposed to be happy if they have reached some perfect state. The differences between happiness and concepts like well-being and utility are sometimes ignored. Some other complications are about the nature of happiness: h作者: assent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:57 作者: BRAND 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6nknowingly. They usually adopt standards without being aware of it, for example the standards of their parents, their school and their social environment in general. Cognitive peculiarities imply that they ignore relevant information, or rely on invalid information, in their adoption of standards. S作者: Hemoptysis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:42 作者: conscribe 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8 are acceptable, even if people can be somewhat ‘positive’, for psychological or strategic reasons. The measurement of evaluative happiness is easier than the measurement of affective happiness. This is one reason to focus primarily on evaluative happiness as a standard in personal life and in polit作者: dagger 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:31 作者: lactic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:33 作者: EWE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:43 作者: 嚴(yán)峻考驗(yàn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:58
Introducing Children to Modeling Variabilityconsistent and immoral standards. This freedom is a potential problem for the comparability, consistency and morality of happiness. In reality, however, people seem to adopt similar, consistent and morally acceptable standards. Happy people are—in general—better citizens. Differences in average happ作者: 搖擺 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:38
Jan OttDraws on findings from the World Database of Happiness and in the World Happiness Reports.Brings together considerations for academics across economics, policy, philosophy and sociology.Makes specific作者: Gratuitous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:16 作者: ENDOW 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56600-5happiness; wellbeing; policy-making; philosophy of economics; welfare; affect; cognition; psychology of eco作者: Dissonance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:31 作者: 討好女人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:39
Introduction: The Confusion About Happiness,ome perfect state and it is not the same as utility. Individuals may adopt very different standards, and theoretically, this can lead to incomparability of happiness of different individuals. People may also adopt egocentric or immoral standards. Happiness is dualistic because it depends on two comp作者: NEG 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:52
The Concept and the Nature of Happiness as Subjective Well-Being,ng. There are some conceptual complications. In colloquial language people are supposed to be happy if they have reached some perfect state. The differences between happiness and concepts like well-being and utility are sometimes ignored. Some other complications are about the nature of happiness: h作者: separate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:39
Affective Happiness, or the Affective Component of Happiness,e happiness. Emotions, moods and dispositions depend on personality and genes; on previous and current gratification or frustration of general human needs and on perceived gaps between how things are and how they should be. The gratification of needs is the main source of emotions of children, and m作者: incisive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:31 作者: Esophagus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:10 作者: Compassionate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:21 作者: DRILL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:13
Governments and Happiness,overnments is the most crucial factor. This quality is important in direct contacts between government agencies and citizens: citizens want to be treated respectfully, carefully and without discrimination. It is also important in an indirect way, because good governments can create living conditions作者: 減弱不好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:32
,Happiness as a Descriptive Standard or?as a Standard to be Pursued, cons and suggest some options. There are different modalities. Happiness can be used as a descriptive standard to detect problems, to be put on the agenda, but also in a more ambitious way to decide about priorities. In classical utilitarianism happiness can be used as a standard to maximize happin作者: 思想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:19
What If? A More Critical Lifestyle and Some Policy Options,d and/or as a standard to be pursued in their personal life? We may expect some change. People usually adopt and adapt their standards unknowingly, and may adopt inconsistent, overambitious and inconvenient standards, and perhaps even immoral standards. The adoption and adaptation of standards are s作者: 胎兒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:22
Summary, Concluding Remarks and General Conclusion,consistent and immoral standards. This freedom is a potential problem for the comparability, consistency and morality of happiness. In reality, however, people seem to adopt similar, consistent and morally acceptable standards. Happy people are—in general—better citizens. Differences in average happ作者: LAVA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:16 作者: VEST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:35 作者: 無(wú)法治愈 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:11 作者: Angioplasty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:32 作者: 出價(jià) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6e are, on the other hand, also reasons to believe that people apply similar standards and do not change them easily. People usually respect the gratification of general needs as an important standard, and there is convergence due to globalization and commercial advertising. People are free, neverthe作者: Nibble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:11 作者: inhibit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:17 作者: BOOM 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:01 作者: 披肩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:46
Introducing Children to Modeling Variabilityss. It may also focus more attention on visible and less visible unhappiness among people in their social environment. It is problematic, however, that there are no effective explanations of differences in individual happiness within nations. There is no general knowledge which enables us to explain作者: 不能仁慈 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:29
Introducing Children to Modeling Variabilityn explaining individual happiness is that individual freedom to adopt standards may reduce the comparability of happiness, and may create some indeterminacy. There are good reasons to adopt happiness as a descriptive standard in our personal life and in politics, and perhaps even as a standard to be作者: 成績(jī)上升 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:24 作者: Ganglion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:12 作者: 遺忘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:40 作者: 聯(lián)想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:06 作者: 泥沼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:41
Back to Overall Happiness: It Exists!,iness, we will first pay attention to an interesting preliminary question about their mutual relation: is there any dominance of affective or cognitive happiness, in view of their relations with the body and the mind? The practical answer is that this philosophical discussion is undecided and that t作者: locus-ceruleus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:12 作者: PACK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:35 作者: 拱形面包 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:38 作者: 落葉劑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:56
Summary, Concluding Remarks and General Conclusion,n explaining individual happiness is that individual freedom to adopt standards may reduce the comparability of happiness, and may create some indeterminacy. There are good reasons to adopt happiness as a descriptive standard in our personal life and in politics, and perhaps even as a standard to be
