作者: 祖?zhèn)髫?cái)產(chǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:48
Introduction,This chapter starts with a discussion of why sovereign states decide to contract arrangements to provide collective goods in subgroups using concepts from international relations theory. It discusses the importance of NATO for understanding burden sharing across club partners. Finally, the book structure is outlined.作者: bacteria 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:10 作者: Exposition 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:04 作者: amygdala 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:05 作者: 性別 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:32 作者: 苦惱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:30
Young-Man Lee,YoonSu Kim,Man Chollectively to produce the institution’s goods (collective defense, cooperative security and crisis management). Theories of international institutions fail to explain complex burden sharing due to a lack of conceptualizing risks and threats for partners. This chapter offers measures of the four aspe作者: nonradioactive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:26 作者: 頂點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:04 作者: 斷言 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:41 作者: PHONE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1927-8le theories are discussed. Theories received added attention based on results from descriptive data and analyses offered. The research presents the difficulties of collaborating to share complex burdens, but the applicability is broader. Finally, the book closes with a discussion of the model’s gene作者: 鴿子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:21 作者: 冒號 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:33
Contributions to Management Sciencee to geography, capabilities, and threats affecting willingness to shoulder the different burdens associated with the club. The delegation of power internally regarding defense policy and allocations differs across members with different constraints and are factors to consider in burden sharing.作者: 新陳代謝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:50
Complexity and Burden Sharing: Member Risks and Threats,e to geography, capabilities, and threats affecting willingness to shoulder the different burdens associated with the club. The delegation of power internally regarding defense policy and allocations differs across members with different constraints and are factors to consider in burden sharing.作者: 繁殖 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:00 作者: compel 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:26 作者: Fulminate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:31 作者: 商談 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:27 作者: 幾何學(xué)家 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:32 作者: perpetual 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1927-8fficulties of collaborating to share complex burdens, but the applicability is broader. Finally, the book closes with a discussion of the model’s generalizability to study II beyond collective defense, cooperative security, and crisis management. The final portion recommends to advance research and conclusions.作者: 粗語 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:18 作者: 無底 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:18
,‘Measuring’ NATO Member Defense Burdens—Beyond 2%, fail to explain complex burden sharing due to a lack of conceptualizing risks and threats for partners. This chapter offers measures of the four aspects of burdens identified from previous research along with public and original collected data.作者: Promotion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:53 作者: 按等級 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:49
Book 2023ocial, and defense burdens members take on for the institution. The overemphasis of committing a minimum of 2% of member state Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defense spending, as a proxy indicator of alliance commitment does not properly reflect how commitments reduce risks should Article V be invo作者: 一加就噴出 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:10 作者: 跟隨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:41
Support for a Risk Management Model of Institutional Burdens,, as the delegated agent for partners, concerning (global) crisis management and cooperative security. The chapter ends with a qualitative?analysis of the legal texts founding?two NATO COE followed by conclusions.作者: 雕鏤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:18 作者: 建筑師 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1927-8ce of . argues determining state threats and risks relative to the alliance influences military spending and troop allocations to regular and punctual missions; these are complementary ways of measuring burdens . of GDP. Risk management arguments remain untested by most literature on burden sharing and are novel contributions of this work.作者: 共同時(shí)代 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:26 作者: 鞏固 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:23 作者: enormous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:06
Cooperation, Sharing Defense Burdens and Defense Institutions,manage economic and political risks alongside defense and security risks to sovereignty given different geographic perspectives and capacities. The final portion focuses on NATO burden sharing research identifying gaps across research this book rectifies. It argues NATO burden sharing analysis must 作者: Reservation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:40
Complexity and Burden Sharing: Member Risks and Threats,e to geography, capabilities, and threats affecting willingness to shoulder the different burdens associated with the club. The delegation of power internally regarding defense policy and allocations differs across members with different constraints and are factors to consider in burden sharing.作者: Receive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:24 作者: 現(xiàn)任者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:23
Theoretical Perspectives on Collective (Defense and Security) Burden Sharing,as on ‘if states cooperate’ given strategic considerations, perceived threats and risks. If states cooperate, the main theories remain silent on ‘how cooperation will be organized.’ This occurs from a failure to consider member variation?and to distinguish individual from club threats affecting nati作者: Adj異類的 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:41 作者: 舊石器 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:04
Support for a Risk Management Model of Institutional Burdens,tegrates risk and US bilateral agreements while replicating previous findings employing the common measure from the literature, military spending. The second set of models?examines whether states participate in?a new conflict/crisis?operation and the final section?of the chapter explores NATO’s role作者: habile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:26
