標題: Titlebook: Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy; Eerik Lagerspetz,Oili Pulkkinen Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if appl [打印本頁] 作者: T-cell 時間: 2025-3-21 18:14
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy被引頻次
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy年度引用
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy讀者反饋
書目名稱Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 網(wǎng)絡(luò)添麻煩 時間: 2025-3-21 21:22
Book 2023ists and sociologists to discuss the criticisms and crises of democracy with fresh approaches to the idea of democracy, democratic theory, democratic institutions, trust and distrust, populism, and advancement of technologies in Western societies..作者: 概觀 時間: 2025-3-22 04:06 作者: 平躺 時間: 2025-3-22 06:09
Ermittlung des Materialbedarfs,ists, political theorists and sociologists to discuss the challenges, criticism and crises of democracy with fresh approaches to the idea of democracy, democratic theory, democratic institutions, trust and distrust, populism and advancement of technologies.作者: CANT 時間: 2025-3-22 12:10 作者: GRIN 時間: 2025-3-22 15:26 作者: 勤勞 時間: 2025-3-22 19:01
Distrust and Democracyualize the role of institutionalized distrust in a satisfactory way. Hegel’s theory of recognition, as formulated in his ., provides some conceptual tools for the conceptualization of the role of opposition as the institutionalized form of distrust.作者: 失眠癥 時間: 2025-3-22 21:39 作者: tolerance 時間: 2025-3-23 04:46
,L?sungshinweise zu den Fragen,gical basis of contemporary populist interpretations of the democratic ideal. It is therefore wrong to regard populism as only being directed against liberal democracy. Populist ideology and political practice, rather, are inimical to democracy per se.作者: 配置 時間: 2025-3-23 05:31 作者: negotiable 時間: 2025-3-23 12:46
Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy978-3-031-41397-1Series ISSN 2946-3416 Series E-ISSN 2946-3424 作者: FIS 時間: 2025-3-23 15:19 作者: 憎惡 時間: 2025-3-23 21:06
978-3-031-41399-5The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: 說不出 時間: 2025-3-24 00:12
Eerik Lagerspetz,Oili PulkkinenExplores how the concept of democracy is being impacted by technological developments.Proposes that democracy requires trust as well as distrust to function properly.Brings together historians, philos作者: Kidney-Failure 時間: 2025-3-24 03:04
Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Centuryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/184886.jpg作者: pantomime 時間: 2025-3-24 09:26 作者: 旅行路線 時間: 2025-3-24 12:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9847-7well-ordered democratic institutions can hardly function. In this paper, I discuss an important part of the complex fabric of overall trust in a democracy: trust in science. Science and scientific experts have enjoyed exceptional trust during the COVID-19 crisis in many democratic countries. It is n作者: 邊緣帶來墨水 時間: 2025-3-24 16:20 作者: BYRE 時間: 2025-3-24 22:49
,E- Procurement — elektronische Beschaffung,tion in a democratic system is to express distrust. This chapter discusses several classical theories of democracy and argues that they do not conceptualize the role of institutionalized distrust in a satisfactory way. Hegel’s theory of recognition, as formulated in his ., provides some conceptual t作者: 表皮 時間: 2025-3-25 03:14
,E- Procurement — elektronische Beschaffung,g both democracy and populism reveal the normative standing of populism and its potential contradictions with democracy. Populism is often described either as a corrective to democracy or its pathology. On the one hand, populism can be seen as politics par excellence, reviving democracies in crisis.作者: cardiovascular 時間: 2025-3-25 03:48 作者: Cardiac-Output 時間: 2025-3-25 08:35 作者: Transfusion 時間: 2025-3-25 14:19
,L?sungshinweise zu den Fragen,he same time are not authoritarian enough to be considered hybrid regimes or full dictatorships. In the article, we contrast the rule of law to the rule of man, to distinguish power and attempts to restrict or limit it. Our cases, or rather examples, come from recent developments in the United State作者: WATER 時間: 2025-3-25 17:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9847-7rotecting constitutional democracy, and, at the same time, it is most dangerous enemy. The historical starting point is the Roman dictatorship: a legally established office with wide powers but temporal limits. The early modern republican authors saw the Roman institution as a model. In the republic作者: ANTI 時間: 2025-3-25 23:21
Intensivtraining Projektmanagementch are then transferred to political decisions in elections and parliamentary resolutions. The opposite view uses questions on the political agenda as the point of departure and regards both election campaigns and parliamentary debate as procedures to modify the given opinions towards forming politi作者: 帶來的感覺 時間: 2025-3-26 02:49
Intensivtraining Projektmanagementduce undemocratic results in practice. Correspondingly, there are two influential defenses of representative institutions. According to the competence argument, we cannot expect citizens to be sufficiently virtuous, intelligent, interested, or well informed to make decisions that concern the good of作者: Misnomer 時間: 2025-3-26 05:25 作者: GLOOM 時間: 2025-3-26 09:32 作者: 四牛在彎曲 時間: 2025-3-26 13:27 作者: Germinate 時間: 2025-3-26 19:31
Suspicious Minds: Towards a Typology of Political Distrustitical distrust, or suspicion towards politics, has not been studied as much as political trust, although political theory has emphasized the importance of distrust in democracy since ancient times. The plentiful research on political trust shows that the importance of political trust varies dependi作者: 果仁 時間: 2025-3-26 20:58
Distrust and Democracytion in a democratic system is to express distrust. This chapter discusses several classical theories of democracy and argues that they do not conceptualize the role of institutionalized distrust in a satisfactory way. Hegel’s theory of recognition, as formulated in his ., provides some conceptual t作者: gout109 時間: 2025-3-27 02:40 作者: 流動性 時間: 2025-3-27 07:20
Carl Schmitt and the Political Theology of Populismogical understanding of democracy, which assimilates political leadership into prophetic authority, implies an expressive or identitarian conception of democratic community. The latter is at odds with a genuinely democratic understanding of popular consent and liable to provide ideological cover for作者: 確定無疑 時間: 2025-3-27 10:51
Between Democracy and Authoritarianism: The Illiberal Challengeems that hold potentially competitive elections but undermine democratic norms by various authoritarian means. Such political systems are often labelled ‘illiberal democracies’, but they should not even be granted the veneer of democracy, as their procedures significantly skew elections. Instead, il作者: Accord 時間: 2025-3-27 13:40 作者: superfluous 時間: 2025-3-27 19:50 作者: itinerary 時間: 2025-3-28 00:46
From the Democracy of Opinions to the Democracy of Proceduresch are then transferred to political decisions in elections and parliamentary resolutions. The opposite view uses questions on the political agenda as the point of departure and regards both election campaigns and parliamentary debate as procedures to modify the given opinions towards forming politi作者: Middle-Ear 時間: 2025-3-28 05:32 作者: Ordeal 時間: 2025-3-28 08:02
On the Concept and Practice of Democracy in Late-Modern Mass Conditions: An Oakeshottian Updatet that it would be beneficial to differentiate between these more carefully. I discuss some points made earlier, especially by Michael Oakeshott and Bernard Crick. Due to their long careers, their work reflects long-term change in conceptions of democracy. The huge corporate power and superpower men作者: 羊欄 時間: 2025-3-28 14:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9847-7t empower laymen in identifying trustworthy experts; (c) a stable ‘veritistic equilibrium’ in trust-networks that ensures a ‘truth-conserving’ distribution of knowledge; (d) the resilience of trustworthy science in the digital world, where it is endangered most. The results of this analysis can, in 作者: 無彈性 時間: 2025-3-28 18:11 作者: Instinctive 時間: 2025-3-28 20:49
,E- Procurement — elektronische Beschaffung,t becomes that populism cannot be accommodated within it. In short, the theory of democracy has a key role in the differing normative conclusions that various authors draw from their accounts of populism. The central contribution of this chapter is to make explicit the breadth of the theoretical com作者: 殺菌劑 時間: 2025-3-28 23:39
,L?sungshinweise zu den Fragen,zing control of the media, undermining the rule of law, or mobilizing state resources for campaigning. Authoritarian actors can also improve their chances with technical decisions: enacting voter suppression, redrawing district boundaries, or changing electoral rules, for instance. However, more bla作者: intimate 時間: 2025-3-29 05:24
,L?sungshinweise zu den Fragen,ions and obstructing the opposing groups. This phenomenon can be seen as a by-product of strong enough political power, and ultimately authoritarianism is not the only rival of liberal democracy, but democracy itself.作者: Neuropeptides 時間: 2025-3-29 10:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9847-7 believe that the exceptional can be subjected to normative regulation. For decisionists, any attempt to regulate the exceptional is doomed to fail for conceptual reasons. A third possibility is to stick to the constitutional rules and accept the consequences, for law simply cannot authorize its own作者: aqueduct 時間: 2025-3-29 14:09 作者: 有節(jié)制 時間: 2025-3-29 18:43 作者: subacute 時間: 2025-3-29 20:02 作者: 釋放 時間: 2025-3-30 03:57 作者: 彎腰 時間: 2025-3-30 06:26
The Trust in Science Revisited: Social-Epistemic Challenges in Democratic and Digital Societiest empower laymen in identifying trustworthy experts; (c) a stable ‘veritistic equilibrium’ in trust-networks that ensures a ‘truth-conserving’ distribution of knowledge; (d) the resilience of trustworthy science in the digital world, where it is endangered most. The results of this analysis can, in 作者: GNAW 時間: 2025-3-30 08:19
