標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Between Compliance and Particularism; Member State Interes Marton Varju Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 EU obligations.Member [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: GUST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:14
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism年度引用
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱Between Compliance and Particularism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: perjury 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:22 作者: PHONE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:54
EU Post-crisis Economic and Financial Market Regulation,law tools is not entirely unproblematic. There are clear challenges associated with such solutions for “interest-inclusion” which question whether there is a modest way forward in attempting to improve the legitimacy of such arrangements.作者: Infraction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:33 作者: Veneer 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:04
Member State Interests and European Union Law,lective effort from the affected—interdependent—States. This led to the Member States conferring powers and functions to the Union and its institutions to develop cross-border policies and introduce cross-border obligations. In the wake of the financial and economic crisis, the Member States were al作者: 得罪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:41
,Managing Novel Food Technologies and Member States’ Interests,ies. In contrast, fragmentation within the risk analysis for novel food technologies favours the weight of scientific evidence within the decision-making process and encourages centralisation. This problematic fragmentation must be tackled since it prevents non-scientific factors from being consider作者: ciliary-body 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:13 作者: Insubordinate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:54
,Member States’ Interests and the Common Commercial Policy,aim of this chapter is to explore this analytical perspective and determine on that basis the limits of the discretion that is still available in this policy domain for the Member States. We will investigate, in particular, the ability of the Member States to promote and represent their trade intere作者: palliate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:51
Foreign Policy Without Unilateral Alternatives?,he strict conditions required by EU law are fulfilled. The aim of this chapter is to explore these conditions and the opportunities provided by them for the Member States to promote their national interests in the field of international economic sanctions.作者: Aesthete 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:24 作者: 營(yíng)養(yǎng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:19 作者: 鈍劍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:12
Tomasz Kogut,Dominik Ry?ko,Karol Ga??zkalegal orders—what will be called here the “Ever Closer Union Model”. According to this model, the gradual integration of the national and the EU legal orders will give rise to an expanding common legal area, which is where the loyalty principle and Member State interests interact. This chapter argue作者: JAMB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:17
Marzena Kryszkiewicz,Bart?omiej Jańczaklaw tools is not entirely unproblematic. There are clear challenges associated with such solutions for “interest-inclusion” which question whether there is a modest way forward in attempting to improve the legitimacy of such arrangements.作者: 千篇一律 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:54
Tomasz Adamczyk,Piotr Andruszkiewiczle with diversity of economic models at national level. A series of complex trade-offs resulting from the last revision of the EU public procurement rules, where Member State interests played a multifaceted role, have consolidated a competition-based model with significant flexibility for non-market作者: 痛苦一生 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:54
Carlos Carvalho,Ricardo Pessoa,Rui Josélective effort from the affected—interdependent—States. This led to the Member States conferring powers and functions to the Union and its institutions to develop cross-border policies and introduce cross-border obligations. In the wake of the financial and economic crisis, the Member States were al作者: WAIL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:18
Joel Ribeiro,Jorge Tavares,Tania Fontesies. In contrast, fragmentation within the risk analysis for novel food technologies favours the weight of scientific evidence within the decision-making process and encourages centralisation. This problematic fragmentation must be tackled since it prevents non-scientific factors from being consider作者: 尊敬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:38 作者: 安撫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97603-3aim of this chapter is to explore this analytical perspective and determine on that basis the limits of the discretion that is still available in this policy domain for the Member States. We will investigate, in particular, the ability of the Member States to promote and represent their trade intere作者: 領(lǐng)先 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30855-0he strict conditions required by EU law are fulfilled. The aim of this chapter is to explore these conditions and the opportunities provided by them for the Member States to promote their national interests in the field of international economic sanctions.作者: MUTE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:22 作者: 反對(duì) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:58
Studies in Computational Intelligencentervention. In doing so, it seeks to address the following key questions: to what extent are national preferences subsumed in the notion of “common interest”? What scope does State aid law allow for the pursuit of industrial policy at EU and at national level? Does State aid policy promote a certain kind of industrial policy?作者: arrogant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:27 作者: chassis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:01
Book 2019a manner and EU law, where the latter expresses either an obligation for the member states to comply with common policies or an acceptance of member state particularism under the common EU framework..作者: 充滿裝飾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:44
Rafa? Hazan,Piotr Andruszkiewiczfundamental national interests. This chapter aims at exploring the constraints in invoking Article 4(2) TEU and does so by looking at the main features indispensable for the application of EU law, at the principle of proportionality and lastly, at the founding values protected in Article 2 TEU.作者: CRASS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93332-0ng of EU policy in this domain and the ultimate position taken by the EU’s interests . those safeguarded by the Member States. Overall it is questionable whether an appropriate balance has been established between the EU’s predominantly market-related policy goals and the complex array of national interests?in the analysed field.作者: FORGO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:26 作者: Gustatory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:22
Member State Interests and the EU Law on Unfair B2C and B2B Practices,ng of EU policy in this domain and the ultimate position taken by the EU’s interests . those safeguarded by the Member States. Overall it is questionable whether an appropriate balance has been established between the EU’s predominantly market-related policy goals and the complex array of national interests?in the analysed field.作者: exclamation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:17 作者: 脾氣暴躁的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:14 作者: Fraudulent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:11 作者: neutrophils 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:58 作者: 改革運(yùn)動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:51
Member State Interests and EU Internal Market Law,tice should be rolled back in order to preserve more room for national public policy choices. On the other hand, the paper takes note of the fact that drawing a precise line between legitimate national policy measures and hidden regulatory or other protectionism is a difficult exercise.作者: Benign 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:07
,Member States’ Interest in the Enforcement of EU Competition Law,n particular, national laws and legal and administrative practices, which bind NCAs and national courts, directly influence the application of Articles 101 and 102 in the national territory. This chapter examines examples of such national measures and practices and assesses their impact of re-nationalising EU competition law and policy.作者: 比喻好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:24 作者: Celiac-Plexus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:32 作者: 完整 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:26
Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019作者: coddle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:47
Tomasz Kogut,Dominik Ry?ko,Karol Ga??zka. The process of integration as well as the fate of individual polices have continued to be directly influenced by the interests brought by the Member States to the European arena and negotiated among them. From this perspective, European integration serves as a vehicle for the promotion of the part作者: Focus-Words 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:48
Rafa? Hazan,Piotr Andruszkiewiczdy in the context of the EEC Treaty, Member States were precluded from adopting measures that would obstruct the internal market unless they could invoke very good reasons permitted by the Treaty or the case law of the Court of Justice. Seeing the purpose of the founding Treaties, namely taming nati作者: 帶來(lái)的感覺(jué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:45
Tomasz Kogut,Dominik Ry?ko,Karol Ga??zkainterplay with the principle of sincere cooperation. Enshrined in EU primary law, in particular in Article 4(3) TEU, that principle has evolved during the time into a veritable cornerstone of the EU legal order. Even though scholars have recently (re)started to pay attention to the loyalty principle作者: 微粒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:57 作者: Cardioplegia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:07 作者: 青春期 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:46 作者: Euphonious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04714-0ting enforcement responsibilities to national competition authorities (NCAs) and courts, but also the possibilities for Member States to implement their respective national competition policies and the domestic interest considerations embedded therein. In the multilevel governance framework establis作者: ligature 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:39
Tomasz Adamczyk,Piotr Andruszkiewicz of neoliberal conceptions of State intervention in the economy that do not necessarily match the general preferences of Member States with a social market economy orientation. Following that view, it could be thought that there is a limited (and possibly narrowing) space for Member State interests 作者: 艱苦地移動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:16 作者: chalice 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:21
Carlos Carvalho,Ricardo Pessoa,Rui Joséd discretion. Their principal interest is to protect from EU intervention their ability to develop, operate and finance national health systems as dictated by domestic political, social and economic factors. As demonstrated by the example of cross-border health care, the Member States are acutely aw作者: Directed 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:26 作者: 無(wú)意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:32 作者: Prophylaxis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:21 作者: NAIVE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 07:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97603-3e role it played in the evolution of the EU legal order. It provided an early example for what is essentially supranational policy-making and it also served, as driven by the debates surrounding the Court of Justice’s case law in the 1970s, as a “l(fā)aboratory” for determining the allocation of compete作者: 允許 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30855-0ng their particular interests is an accepted form of behaviour. This chapter argues, however, that national governments are in fact seriously constrained by the current legal framework governing EU external action, in particular its regime for imposing economic sanctions on third countries or indivi作者: glacial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 13:43 作者: 芳香一點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 19:36 作者: LAITY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 22:07 作者: constitutional 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 03:01
In Search of Limits for the Protection of National Identities as a Member State Interest,dy in the context of the EEC Treaty, Member States were precluded from adopting measures that would obstruct the internal market unless they could invoke very good reasons permitted by the Treaty or the case law of the Court of Justice. Seeing the purpose of the founding Treaties, namely taming nati作者: 鎮(zhèn)壓 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 06:30
,EU Loyalty and the Protection of Member States’ National Interests,interplay with the principle of sincere cooperation. Enshrined in EU primary law, in particular in Article 4(3) TEU, that principle has evolved during the time into a veritable cornerstone of the EU legal order. Even though scholars have recently (re)started to pay attention to the loyalty principle作者: Affluence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 11:51 作者: negligence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 14:37 作者: pantomime 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 20:06
Member State Interests in EU State Aid Law and Policy,e the interaction between national industrial policy preferences and the policies that EU State aid law allows Member States to pursue through State intervention. In doing so, it seeks to address the following key questions: to what extent are national preferences subsumed in the notion of “common i
