標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy; Andreas Vrahimis Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Taft 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:35
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy被引頻次
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy年度引用
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy讀者反饋
書目名稱Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 極力證明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:34
Henri Bergson: A Misunderstood Celebrity,sinterested method of intuition. Section . turns to Bergson’s response to Spencer, his account of the nature of number, and his well-known discussions of the nature of space and time. Section . clears away the common misconception of Bergson as a critic of natural science. Finally, Sect. . briefly addresses his account of language.作者: BILE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:20
Nikolay Ivanov,Hanqing Guo,Qiben Yane in some ways misguided by William James’s and Max Scheller’s attempts to incorporate Bergson’s outlook into Pragmatism and ., respectively. Karin Costelloe-Stephen defended Bergson against Russell’s criticisms, and also, as this book shows, indirectly responded to Stebbing’s and Schlick’s objections.作者: insolence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:33 作者: Interregnum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:28 作者: 共同給與 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:11 作者: 外表讀作 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:06 作者: oracle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:47
Information and Communications Securitycal tool, it is incapable of communicating intuition. Bergson therefore cannot avoid radical scepticism. Stebbing’s views predate and prefigure those first developed by Schlick in 1913. This chapter closes by showing how Stebbing’s criticisms were (indirectly) answered by Costelloe-Stephen.作者: evasive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:24 作者: duplicate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:40 作者: ACTIN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:00 作者: miracle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:15
Information and Communications Security involves a central appeal to intuition. As Stebbing had foreseen, rival appeals to intuition are counterpoised against Bergson’s view by Heidegger and Sartre. To complicate matters further, Ayer employs a version of Carnap’s argument against Sartre, whose views on nothingness had resulted from his engagement with Bergson.作者: CAPE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:19
Teik Guan Tan,De Wen Soh,Jianying Zhouge is repeated in similar later polemics by Oxford philosophers, especially Ryle and R.M. Hare. Thus, earlier criticisms of Bergsonism become embroiled in proclamations concerning the existence of a divide that separates ‘a(chǎn)nalytic’ from ‘continental’ philosophy.作者: 轎車 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:44 作者: 戰(zhàn)勝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:30
Introduction,e in some ways misguided by William James’s and Max Scheller’s attempts to incorporate Bergson’s outlook into Pragmatism and ., respectively. Karin Costelloe-Stephen defended Bergson against Russell’s criticisms, and also, as this book shows, indirectly responded to Stebbing’s and Schlick’s objections.作者: perpetual 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:52
Prelude: Bergsonism and Anglophone Analytic Philosophy,uenced the Bloomsbury group. Though scholarship turned to either Russell or Bergson in accounting for Virginia Woolf’s conception of the stream of consciousness, this chapter argues that Costelloe-Stephen’s original work (responding to Bergson and Russell) is clearly a more direct influence of Woolf.作者: 辯論的終結(jié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:47
William James and the Anglophone Reception of Bergsonism,s to Bergson a ‘radical empiricism’ that moves away from concepts and returns to lived experience. In James’ view, his contemporary philosophy is faced with a choice: Bergson’s radical empiricism or Bradley’s absolute idealism? James opts for the former.作者: 主動(dòng)脈 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:43 作者: 羊欄 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:17
,‘Analytic’ and ‘Synthetic’ Philosophy: Karin Costelloe-Stephen’s Defences of Bergson,the relations between sense-data must be logical. Having examined Costelloe-Stephen’s debate with Russell, this chapter looks at Russell’s subsequent polemical proclamations concerning the distinction between Moore’s ‘a(chǎn)nalytic philosophy’ versus Costelloe-Stephen’s and Bergson’s continental ‘synthetic’ philosophy.作者: 閃光東本 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:51
,A Call for Moderation: L. Susan Stebbing’s Critique of Bergson,cal tool, it is incapable of communicating intuition. Bergson therefore cannot avoid radical scepticism. Stebbing’s views predate and prefigure those first developed by Schlick in 1913. This chapter closes by showing how Stebbing’s criticisms were (indirectly) answered by Costelloe-Stephen.作者: VICT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:35
,Entr’acte: Bergson’s Germanophone Reception and the Rise of ,olitics. This explains how Bergson came to, at least in part misleadingly, appear as an enemy of the Vienna Circle’s Scientific World-Conception. This chapter closes by discussing Logical Empiricist opposition to ., focusing on the influence Russell’s critique of Bergson had on Neurath’s ..作者: FIS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:34
,Evolutionary Epistemology: Moritz Schlick’s Critique of Intuition,nt of scientific knowledge as a ‘system of images’, Schlick develops an account of theoretical knowledge (.) in which images are replaced by exact concepts. On this basis, Schlick objects against the thesis that intuition is a form of knowledge.作者: 行乞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:07 作者: Watemelon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:40
Different Kinds of Nothing, involves a central appeal to intuition. As Stebbing had foreseen, rival appeals to intuition are counterpoised against Bergson’s view by Heidegger and Sartre. To complicate matters further, Ayer employs a version of Carnap’s argument against Sartre, whose views on nothingness had resulted from his engagement with Bergson.作者: 下邊深陷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:55
Doing Without Masters: Oxford Philosophy and the Analytic-Continental Divide,ge is repeated in similar later polemics by Oxford philosophers, especially Ryle and R.M. Hare. Thus, earlier criticisms of Bergsonism become embroiled in proclamations concerning the existence of a divide that separates ‘a(chǎn)nalytic’ from ‘continental’ philosophy.作者: dysphagia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:35
Conclusion,s (like Sartre’s and Heidegger’s) unwillingness to answer criticisms. However, by paying heed to Costelloe-Stephen’s and Stebbing’s work, as this book has shown, communication (without excessive polemics) between Bergson’s analytic critics and some of their interlocutors can be partly re-established.作者: prodrome 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:44 作者: 考古學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:25 作者: 分開 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:26
Junnan Wang,Qixu Liu,Chaoge Liu,Jie Yinsinterested method of intuition. Section . turns to Bergson’s response to Spencer, his account of the nature of number, and his well-known discussions of the nature of space and time. Section . clears away the common misconception of Bergson as a critic of natural science. Finally, Sect. . briefly addresses his account of language.作者: babble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:43 作者: 忍耐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86890-1sm initially arose due to Bergson’s involvement in controversies in France. His visits to Britain in 1911, and the United States in 1913, were widely reported by the popular press, transforming his celebrity into an international phenomenon. This chapter further accounts for the circumstances surrou作者: Parley 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:03
Junnan Wang,Qixu Liu,Chaoge Liu,Jie Yin arguments later discussed by the philosophers this book examines. Section . accounts for Bergson’s evolutionary epistemology of perception. Section . explains his theories of memory and recognition. Section . analyses Bergson’s account of the practical nature of intellect, and his proposal for a di作者: 龍卷風(fēng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:17 作者: indemnify 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:48
Nikolay Ivanov,Hanqing Guo,Qiben Yanrgson ignored important developments in mathematics (by Frege and Cantor). These inform Russell’s criticisms of Bergson’s definition of number and of his solution to Zeno’s paradoxes. Russell also objects to Bergson’s accounts of time, memory, and perceptual images. H.W. Carr’s various replies to Ru作者: Flu表流動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:03
Mingliang Feng,Yongbin Zhou,Zhenmei Yurms her connected accounts of recognition, abstraction, and inductive reasoning. On this basis, Costelloe-Stephen responds to Russell’s criticisms of Bergson’s theories of space and .. She criticises Russell’s interpretation of an experiment first conducted by Carl Stumpf, objecting to Russell’s con作者: 胖人手藝好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:59 作者: 袖章 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77048-0ein, and the eventual demise of his celebrity during the interwar period. Scheler’s 1913 presentation of Bergson appeals, among others, to Russell’s criticisms in presenting Bergsonism as an outdated fashion, while at the same time aligning Bergson with certain anti-scientific attitudes prevalent in作者: 易于 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:27 作者: 易于 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:08 作者: Banister 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:53 作者: 顛簸地移動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:08 作者: 冒號(hào) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:03 作者: FRAUD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:14 作者: Decibel 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:17 作者: 姑姑在炫耀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:42 作者: Contend 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:17 作者: 災(zāi)難 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:34 作者: superfluous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:58 作者: 季雨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:00
Prelude: Bergsonism and Anglophone Analytic Philosophy,sm initially arose due to Bergson’s involvement in controversies in France. His visits to Britain in 1911, and the United States in 1913, were widely reported by the popular press, transforming his celebrity into an international phenomenon. This chapter further accounts for the circumstances surrou作者: 伴隨而來(lái) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:30
Henri Bergson: A Misunderstood Celebrity, arguments later discussed by the philosophers this book examines. Section . accounts for Bergson’s evolutionary epistemology of perception. Section . explains his theories of memory and recognition. Section . analyses Bergson’s account of the practical nature of intellect, and his proposal for a di作者: 青春期 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:42
William James and the Anglophone Reception of Bergsonism,on of the French Bergsonist fad into an international phenomenon. He portrayed Bergson as a unique solitary genius whose views are unprecedented in the history of philosophy. James called Bergson an ‘a(chǎn)nti-intellectualist’, a term traceable to earlier debates about Pragmatism. James interprets Bergso作者: Feigned 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:13
,‘Ants, bees, and Bergson’: Bertrand Russell’s Polemic,rgson ignored important developments in mathematics (by Frege and Cantor). These inform Russell’s criticisms of Bergson’s definition of number and of his solution to Zeno’s paradoxes. Russell also objects to Bergson’s accounts of time, memory, and perceptual images. H.W. Carr’s various replies to Ru作者: Largess 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 17:46
,‘Analytic’ and ‘Synthetic’ Philosophy: Karin Costelloe-Stephen’s Defences of Bergson,rms her connected accounts of recognition, abstraction, and inductive reasoning. On this basis, Costelloe-Stephen responds to Russell’s criticisms of Bergson’s theories of space and .. She criticises Russell’s interpretation of an experiment first conducted by Carl Stumpf, objecting to Russell’s con
