標題: Titlebook: Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy; Sally Frampton Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The [打印本頁] 作者: Glitch 時間: 2025-3-21 19:07
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy被引頻次
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy年度引用
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy讀者反饋
書目名稱Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: nephritis 時間: 2025-3-21 20:30 作者: Axon895 時間: 2025-3-22 01:00
ury medicine and society.Provides a new analytical framework.This open access book looks at the dramatic history of ovariotomy, an operation to remove ovarian tumours first practiced in the early nineteenth century. Bold and daring, surgeons who performed it claimed to be initiating a new era of sur作者: Intercept 時間: 2025-3-22 07:14 作者: 人造 時間: 2025-3-22 10:50 作者: cogitate 時間: 2025-3-22 13:51
Conclusion,ovation process can be treated as self-evident; and that which we might initially take for granted as being unambiguous about an innovation: its beginning, its ending, even its definition, are not necessarily so.作者: Culpable 時間: 2025-3-22 19:13
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018ability. This book traces the operation’s innovation, from its roots in eighteenth-century pathology, through the denouncement of those who performed it as ‘belly-rippers’, to its rapid uptake in the 1880s, when ovariotomists were accused of over-operating. Throughout the century, the operation was never a hair’s breadth from controversy..作者: 高腳酒杯 時間: 2025-3-22 22:12 作者: 細微差別 時間: 2025-3-23 02:45
On the Asymmetry of Economic Cyclesrade and business, which nonetheless was often gendered. The powerful financial connotations of ovariotomy were revealing not only of the ascendance of surgeons’ professional status (in which money played an implicit role) but also the pecuniary gains—and losses—that association with surgical innovation could bring.作者: 羞辱 時間: 2025-3-23 07:20 作者: 生來 時間: 2025-3-23 13:07 作者: 確認 時間: 2025-3-23 17:02
Askar Akaev,Yuri Ichkitidze,Valentin Sokolove. The chapter argues that it was also the relative expendability of reproductive organs, in comparison with other ‘vital’ organs, which further focused attention upon them as a potential site of surgical intervention.作者: 貪婪性 時間: 2025-3-23 21:51 作者: Feature 時間: 2025-3-23 23:50 作者: 輕快走過 時間: 2025-3-24 03:22 作者: 諷刺滑稽戲劇 時間: 2025-3-24 07:56 作者: 模仿 時間: 2025-3-24 13:01
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018tury. Bold and daring, surgeons who performed it claimed to be initiating a new era of surgery by opening the abdomen. Ovariotomy soon occupied a complex position within medicine and society, as an operation which symbolised surgical progress, while also remaining at the boundaries of ethical accept作者: morale 時間: 2025-3-24 16:23 作者: 誤傳 時間: 2025-3-24 19:42
Pathologies, Actions, Ideas,o have a complex pathology, which made it an object of curiosity within the burgeoning field of morbid anatomy. Chaotic, deceptive and at times astonishing due to the enormous size they could attain, ovarian tumours were seen to defy both bodily order and medical control. These difficulties precipit作者: 啟發(fā) 時間: 2025-3-24 23:39
Creating a Surgical Controversy,ical press. This chapter focuses on the period between the 1830s and 1850s, a time during which the operation to remove diseased ovaries was given the appellation ‘ovariotomy’, and when the debate as to the justifiability of the operation was at its most polarised. For an increasingly vocal group of作者: 小臼 時間: 2025-3-25 05:39 作者: 閑蕩 時間: 2025-3-25 09:52
The Business of Surgery,en 1870 and 1900 when there was increasing concern about the overuse of ovariotomy. The latter development is often read solely through changing notions of female pathology; this chapter offers a new approach to the period by situating the expansion of the operation primarily within a discourse of t作者: 極少 時間: 2025-3-25 14:12
The Afterlife of an Operation,re. Instead it offers an exploration of the ‘a(chǎn)fterlife’ of ovariotomy, following the controversies that surrounded the operation towards the end of the century. By the 1890s, the term ‘ovariotomy’ had become increasingly uncertain in its meaning, as a range of other terms emerged to refer to new tec作者: 過濾 時間: 2025-3-25 19:46
Conclusion,and for the cultural and technological implications of surgical innovation to be seen as intertwined rather than separate. It addresses the usefulness of ‘innovation’ as an analytical category, responding to works which have critiqued ‘innovation-centric history’. It argues that no aspect of the inn作者: interrogate 時間: 2025-3-25 23:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78934-7ovaries; surgery; medicine; innovation; doctor; gender; nineteenth century; ethics; human body; open access; a作者: 瑪瑙 時間: 2025-3-26 03:01 作者: CHURL 時間: 2025-3-26 04:20
Sally FramptonOffers a history of the establishment and development of this controversial surgical practice.Explores key ethical issues in nineteenth-century medicine and society.Provides a new analytical framework作者: disrupt 時間: 2025-3-26 09:35
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/183335.jpg作者: 釘牢 時間: 2025-3-26 13:23
Emerging Trends in Mechatronicsviews the place of ovariotomy in the historiography and particularly the interest the operation has garnered from scholars working on gender and women’s history. It then examines the distinctiveness of surgical innovation within medicine and shows how innovation might be used as a conceptual focal p作者: 舊式步槍 時間: 2025-3-26 17:50 作者: 失望未來 時間: 2025-3-26 22:43
Racing to a Renewable Transition?ical press. This chapter focuses on the period between the 1830s and 1850s, a time during which the operation to remove diseased ovaries was given the appellation ‘ovariotomy’, and when the debate as to the justifiability of the operation was at its most polarised. For an increasingly vocal group of作者: ETHER 時間: 2025-3-27 01:07
William R. Thompson,Leila Zakhirovan of Thomas Spencer Wells’ ., in which the surgeon detailed all 114 ovariotomies he’d performed, dramatically improved the reputation of ovariotomists and signalled a major rebranding of the operation from dangerous novelty to a symbol of Victorian skill and industry. As the operation’s status ascen作者: 按等級 時間: 2025-3-27 07:17 作者: Prognosis 時間: 2025-3-27 12:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79496-5re. Instead it offers an exploration of the ‘a(chǎn)fterlife’ of ovariotomy, following the controversies that surrounded the operation towards the end of the century. By the 1890s, the term ‘ovariotomy’ had become increasingly uncertain in its meaning, as a range of other terms emerged to refer to new tec作者: 彎曲道理 時間: 2025-3-27 15:37 作者: Armory 時間: 2025-3-27 20:53 作者: mydriatic 時間: 2025-3-27 22:19
Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy作者: Libido 時間: 2025-3-28 06:10 作者: 比喻好 時間: 2025-3-28 08:04 作者: 周興旺 時間: 2025-3-28 13:32 作者: 提名 時間: 2025-3-28 17:02
Executive Summary,develop between a business and the community within which it operates. The main consideration should be to maximize the nature and extent of mutually beneficial interrelationships. Henri Nestlé, after whom the company is named, was a German pharmacist. In 1867, he formulated ., a combination of cow’
