標題: Titlebook: Believing in Accordance with the Evidence; New Essays on Eviden Kevin McCain Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Spring [打印本頁] 作者: 固執(zhí)已見 時間: 2025-3-21 19:13
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence被引頻次
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence年度引用
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence讀者反饋
書目名稱Believing in Accordance with the Evidence讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 留戀 時間: 2025-3-21 22:19 作者: 密切關(guān)系 時間: 2025-3-22 04:12
Evidentialism, Time-Slice Mentalism, and Dreamless Sleepopportunity for them to clarify their views. Furthermore, the paper is not only relevant to evidentialists. For example, the arguments of this paper could give Time-Slice Mentalists a reason to deny evidentialism.作者: optic-nerve 時間: 2025-3-22 04:56 作者: 全能 時間: 2025-3-22 11:09 作者: 聯(lián)邦 時間: 2025-3-22 16:14 作者: NOVA 時間: 2025-3-22 19:23
The Evidence in Evidentialisms if they abandon the evidence-first approach. I argue that it is more difficult than might initially appear to avoid the “regress or self-support” dilemma, and that the price for avoiding it is depriving oneself of the ability to explain how cases of both immediate and mediate justification involve the same unitary phenomenon of .作者: 大包裹 時間: 2025-3-22 23:27 作者: BRAWL 時間: 2025-3-23 04:19
Forschungsmethodik und Ergebnisse,ese attitudes and relations. Finally, we examine the implications of our findings for the attitudes that a philosopher might take toward contentious philosophical theses. Evidentialism, our preferred view of epistemic justification, is helpful in clarifying the issues and addressing the problems.作者: Frenetic 時間: 2025-3-23 07:33 作者: hereditary 時間: 2025-3-23 11:05 作者: 艦旗 時間: 2025-3-23 17:23 作者: 多樣 時間: 2025-3-23 19:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84595-5stified. Given premise (1), this prior probability is not itself evidence for the proposition in question, nor does it reflect evidence for the proposition, nor do the facts explaining the high prior probability constitute evidence for the proposition. Hence, it represents a form of non-evidential epistemic justification.作者: myocardium 時間: 2025-3-23 23:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84595-5ence, its possession, and evidential support in non-normative terms, we could then use the Path Principle to give a nice, reductive account of justification. It might appear that the Path Principle is platitudinous, but appearances are sometimes misleading. I‘ll raise two kinds of problems for the Path Principle.作者: Heart-Rate 時間: 2025-3-24 05:43 作者: Intractable 時間: 2025-3-24 09:09
A Probabilistic Critique of Evidentialismstified. Given premise (1), this prior probability is not itself evidence for the proposition in question, nor does it reflect evidence for the proposition, nor do the facts explaining the high prior probability constitute evidence for the proposition. Hence, it represents a form of non-evidential epistemic justification.作者: FILLY 時間: 2025-3-24 11:49 作者: 推測 時間: 2025-3-24 18:32
0166-6991 ibutions by eminent epistemologists as well as up-and-coming.This volume explores evidentialism, a major theory of epistemic justification. It contains more than 20 papers that examine its nuances, its challenges, as well as its future directions. Written by leading and up-and-coming epistemologists作者: 占線 時間: 2025-3-24 20:13 作者: 爭吵加 時間: 2025-3-25 02:22
Seemings, Reasons, and Knowledge: A Defense of Phenomenal Conservatismdentialism is in the clear though. The real problem for evidentialism isn’t that it’s in danger of being false, but, rather, a mere truism. The action, really, is in the theory of evidence. This chapter defends a theory of evidence, Reasons Commonsensism, that avoids the problems leveled by anti-evidentialists.作者: Emasculate 時間: 2025-3-25 05:09 作者: 聯(lián)邦 時間: 2025-3-25 11:21 作者: 窒息 時間: 2025-3-25 13:52
The Evidence in Evidentialismonly acceptable on its own, but acceptable when conjoined with evidentialism. This challenge asks the evidentialist to go beyond just sounding right. In Sect. 3.1, I consider the prospects for answering the challenge by taking what I call the . approach. Under this approach, having evidence supporti作者: Peak-Bone-Mass 時間: 2025-3-25 17:40 作者: Interstellar 時間: 2025-3-25 20:16
Phenomenal Dogmatism, Seeming Evidentialism and Inferential Justificationhe agent’s possession, and (ii) the evidence constitutes a good reason for the belief. Strong normative evidentialism faces two challenges. One is that of explaining which kinds of evidence can serve as a good reason for belief. The other is to explain how inferential justification is possible. If a作者: 斥責 時間: 2025-3-26 02:59 作者: incision 時間: 2025-3-26 08:11
Metacognition As Evidence for Evidentialismich it is intuitive that via recollection the subject has a justified belief. Drawing on psychological research on metacognition, I argue that evidentialism has a unique, accurate prediction in each ordinary retrieval case: the subject has evidence for the proposition she justifiedly believes. But, 作者: 確定的事 時間: 2025-3-26 11:37
Externalist Versions of Evidentialismms of externalism can be evidentialist views. After saying what evidentialism is and identifying four grades of externalism, I argue that, for each of these grades of externalism (from the least external first grade to the most external fourth grade), there is a version of evidentialism exhibiting t作者: 并置 時間: 2025-3-26 15:25
An Evidentialist Social Epistemology memory, intuition, and inference. Evidentialists have given less attention to social epistemology, with the important exception of the epistemic significance of peer disagreement. Taking its cue from this literature, in this essay I will sketch the outlines of a unified evidentialist social epistem作者: PHIL 時間: 2025-3-26 18:45 作者: chalice 時間: 2025-3-26 23:01
Evidentialism and Moral Encroachmentre evidence is required to justify the belief. Moral encroachment thereby opposes evidentialism, and kindred views, which holds that epistemic justification is determined solely by factors pertaining to evidence and truth. In this essay I explain how beliefs such as ‘that woman is probably an admini作者: Terrace 時間: 2025-3-27 04:21 作者: Insulin 時間: 2025-3-27 06:35
Standing in a Garden of Forking Paths this evidence provides. Whenever a thinker properly added a belief to her belief set, this is (in part) because her evidence provided her a path that took her to this belief. Whenever a thinker cannot properly add a belief to her belief set, this is because her evidence does not provide her with th作者: 未開化 時間: 2025-3-27 12:12
Evidentialism, Time-Slice Mentalism, and Dreamless Sleep properties at . are grounded only by one’s mental properties at .; (2) .: all ultimate evidence is experiential; and (3) .: we have justified beliefs while we have dreamless, nonexperiential sleep. Although I intend for this paper to be a polemic against evidentialists, it can also be viewed as an 作者: 詞根詞綴法 時間: 2025-3-27 14:49
No Kind of Reason Is the Wrong Kind of Reasono .?bear on the object of the attitude in a way that is relevant to determining whether the attitude is appropriate. When applied to belief it is often taken as a datum that the only genuine or “right” reasons for belief are those that bear directly on the question of “whether p”; such reasons are o作者: 危機 時間: 2025-3-27 19:39
Believing in Accordance with the Evidence978-3-319-95993-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292 作者: 有雜色 時間: 2025-3-28 01:21
Thomas Sterr,Dietfried G. Liesegangat such justification supervenes on an agent’s evidence. Additionally, the chapter explains that evidentialism requires more clarification and detailing. Finally, short summaries of the other chapters included in this book are provided in this chapter.作者: Amplify 時間: 2025-3-28 03:46 作者: crucial 時間: 2025-3-28 07:23
Thomas Sterr,Dietfried G. Liesegangat such justification supervenes on an agent’s evidence. Additionally, the chapter explains that evidentialism requires more clarification and detailing. Finally, short summaries of the other chapters included in this book are provided in this chapter.作者: intrude 時間: 2025-3-28 11:51 作者: Flawless 時間: 2025-3-28 16:46 作者: 狗舍 時間: 2025-3-28 19:37 作者: tympanometry 時間: 2025-3-29 02:17 作者: 知道 時間: 2025-3-29 06:38 作者: MOAN 時間: 2025-3-29 09:27 作者: CODE 時間: 2025-3-29 12:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5488-2ms of externalism can be evidentialist views. After saying what evidentialism is and identifying four grades of externalism, I argue that, for each of these grades of externalism (from the least external first grade to the most external fourth grade), there is a version of evidentialism exhibiting t作者: 察覺 時間: 2025-3-29 15:37 作者: Cpr951 時間: 2025-3-29 21:52 作者: 機密 時間: 2025-3-30 03:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14612-4re evidence is required to justify the belief. Moral encroachment thereby opposes evidentialism, and kindred views, which holds that epistemic justification is determined solely by factors pertaining to evidence and truth. In this essay I explain how beliefs such as ‘that woman is probably an admini作者: 航海太平洋 時間: 2025-3-30 07:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84595-51) . is evidence for . only if the epistemic probability of . given . is higher than the prior probability of .; (2) epistemic probability satisfies the axioms of mathematical probability theory; (3) a proposition is epistemically justified whenever it is sufficiently probable. Given any threshold f作者: 骯臟 時間: 2025-3-30 10:44 作者: Arctic 時間: 2025-3-30 13:35
,Due Diligence für Industrieimmobilien, properties at . are grounded only by one’s mental properties at .; (2) .: all ultimate evidence is experiential; and (3) .: we have justified beliefs while we have dreamless, nonexperiential sleep. Although I intend for this paper to be a polemic against evidentialists, it can also be viewed as an 作者: 小卒 時間: 2025-3-30 19:58 作者: covert 時間: 2025-3-30 23:57
Kevin McCainDetails the latest developments and extensions of a prominent epistemological theory.Includes new criticisms of evidentialism.Features contributions by eminent epistemologists as well as up-and-coming
