標題: Titlebook: Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty; Problems of Epistemi Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay,Gordon Brittan Jr.,Mark Book 2016 The Author(s) 2016 Bay [打印本頁] 作者: Anagram 時間: 2025-3-21 19:17
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty被引頻次
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty年度引用
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty讀者反饋
書目名稱Belief, Evidence, and Uncertainty讀者反饋學科排名
作者: Homocystinuria 時間: 2025-3-21 22:29 作者: fidelity 時間: 2025-3-22 01:49 作者: 流浪 時間: 2025-3-22 07:05 作者: 搏斗 時間: 2025-3-22 11:22 作者: 摻和 時間: 2025-3-22 13:39
Wirtschaften des Industriebetriebs,s a way of handling the apparent circularity in his account. We discuss and dissolve his well-known charge against Bayesian theories of confirmation, that?they lead to the paradox of “old evidence,” in Chap.?..作者: 公共汽車 時間: 2025-3-22 18:17 作者: 先驅(qū) 時間: 2025-3-23 00:20
Initial Difficulties Dispelledrning our analyses of both confirmation and evidence; the second has to do more narrowly with the application of Bayesian methods. Each suggests a different way in which our intentions in this monograph might be misunderstood.作者: inundate 時間: 2025-3-23 02:08 作者: Exterior 時間: 2025-3-23 09:08
Selective Confirmation, Bootstrapping, and Theoretical Constantss a way of handling the apparent circularity in his account. We discuss and dissolve his well-known charge against Bayesian theories of confirmation, that?they lead to the paradox of “old evidence,” in Chap.?..作者: progestin 時間: 2025-3-23 11:48
Concluding Reflectionsdiscuss an application of the confirmation/evidence distinction to an important problem in current ecological research and in the process suggest ways of settling some outstanding problems at the intersection of statistics and the philosophy of science.作者: 玉米棒子 時間: 2025-3-23 16:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84572-6tions between “data” and “evidence”, and between different ways in which the concept of “probability” is to be interpreted. An Appendix explains how our likelihoodist account of evidence deals with composite hypotheses.作者: 貨物 時間: 2025-3-23 19:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94435-1dentified by Kahneman and Tversky which leads most of us to make mistaken statistical inferences. It is also in the background, or so we argue in some detail, of the important policy controversies concerning human-induced global warming.作者: 不透氣 時間: 2025-3-23 23:09
Bayesian and Evidential Paradigmstions between “data” and “evidence”, and between different ways in which the concept of “probability” is to be interpreted. An Appendix explains how our likelihoodist account of evidence deals with composite hypotheses.作者: 飛鏢 時間: 2025-3-24 06:17 作者: attenuate 時間: 2025-3-24 09:26
Book 2016erstanding of personal and scientific epistemologies. It outlines a probabilistic framework in which subjective features of personal knowledge and objective features of public knowledge have their true place. It also discusses the bearings of some statistical theorems on both formal and traditional 作者: Keratectomy 時間: 2025-3-24 11:41
Introductory Remarks—Inferential Uncertaintye than probable/likely. Intuitively, even obviously, some claims are more probable/likely than others. Everyone agrees that scientific claims in particular are probable/likely to the extent that they are confirmed by experimental evidence. But there is very little agreement about what “confirmation 作者: patella 時間: 2025-3-24 15:18 作者: 發(fā)炎 時間: 2025-3-24 19:17
Confirmation and Evidence Distinguisheda hypothesis may be weakly confirmed and yet the evidence for it can be strong, and conversely, the evidence may be weak and the confirmation strong. At first glance, this seems puzzling; the puzzlement disappears once it is understood that confirmation is of single hypotheses, in which there is an 作者: 吹牛者 時間: 2025-3-25 00:16 作者: Felicitous 時間: 2025-3-25 05:44 作者: Enervate 時間: 2025-3-25 11:21 作者: lambaste 時間: 2025-3-25 15:28
Selective Confirmation, Bootstrapping, and Theoretical Constantsd, and the determination of theoretical constants, on the other. But in our view it is marred by a failure to deal with the problem of confounding, illustrated by the demonstration of a causal link between smoking and lung cancer, and by the apparent circularity of bootstrap testing (which is distin作者: Dissonance 時間: 2025-3-25 18:24
Veridical and Misleading Evidenceians and Glymour, but unlike us, his own account of evidence incorporates what we have called the “true-model” assumption, that there is a conceptual connection between the existence of evidence for a hypothesis and having a good reason to believe that the hypothesis is true. In this connection, and作者: 天文臺 時間: 2025-3-25 22:35 作者: Platelet 時間: 2025-3-26 01:49 作者: Alveoli 時間: 2025-3-26 07:46
Concluding Reflectionse time provide guidance for working scientists and statisticians. Philosophy does not sit in judgment on other disciplines nor can it dictate methodology. Instead, it forces reflection on the aims and methods of these disciplines in the hope that such reflection will lead to a critical testing of th作者: ACME 時間: 2025-3-26 11:20 作者: 小步走路 時間: 2025-3-26 14:15
Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay,Gordon Brittan Jr.,Mark Breaks new ground in building personal and scientific epistemology using the principles of belief, confirmation, and evidence.Makes precise a distinction between the concepts of confirmation and evide作者: synchronous 時間: 2025-3-26 17:39
SpringerBriefs in Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/183313.jpg作者: 小卒 時間: 2025-3-26 23:02 作者: prolate 時間: 2025-3-27 02:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84572-6e than probable/likely. Intuitively, even obviously, some claims are more probable/likely than others. Everyone agrees that scientific claims in particular are probable/likely to the extent that they are confirmed by experimental evidence. But there is very little agreement about what “confirmation 作者: 注意力集中 時間: 2025-3-27 07:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84572-6ach have been given. In order to make the distinction between them as intuitive and precise as possible, we answer the first in a Bayesian way: a hypothesis is confirmed to the extent that the data raise the probability that it is true. We answer the second question in a Likelihoodist way, that is, 作者: Conscientious 時間: 2025-3-27 12:10 作者: legitimate 時間: 2025-3-27 17:34 作者: 踉蹌 時間: 2025-3-27 18:48 作者: 易怒 時間: 2025-3-27 22:42 作者: 調(diào)色板 時間: 2025-3-28 02:20 作者: alcoholism 時間: 2025-3-28 09:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96877-8ians and Glymour, but unlike us, his own account of evidence incorporates what we have called the “true-model” assumption, that there is a conceptual connection between the existence of evidence for a hypothesis and having a good reason to believe that the hypothesis is true. In this connection, and作者: 泛濫 時間: 2025-3-28 13:11
Das Risiko der industriellen Unternehmungso difficult to resolve is that the assumptions that generate them are so intuitive that they resist rejection or reconfiguration. The “paradoxes of confirmation” have been especially difficult to resolve. As much is indicated by the vast literature to which they have given rise. The “raven” and “gr作者: Ordeal 時間: 2025-3-28 16:40
Der industrielle Wertekreislauf. It seems to support in an irrefutable way a radical scepticism about the existence of a physical world existing independent of our sense-experience. But this argument as well as those we discussed in the last chapter and many others of the same kind rest on a conflation of evidence and confirmatio作者: 澄清 時間: 2025-3-28 19:43
Die Betriebsgr??e in der Industriee time provide guidance for working scientists and statisticians. Philosophy does not sit in judgment on other disciplines nor can it dictate methodology. Instead, it forces reflection on the aims and methods of these disciplines in the hope that such reflection will lead to a critical testing of th作者: Cholecystokinin 時間: 2025-3-29 02:39 作者: Feigned 時間: 2025-3-29 03:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96877-8 account, then develop and in turn criticize his own account of “veridical evidence.” In the second half of the chapter, we contrast “veridical” with “misleading” evidence and?show how two key theorems concerning the probability of misleading evidence allow us to measure it.作者: notice 時間: 2025-3-29 10:26 作者: 縮減了 時間: 2025-3-29 15:11 作者: scoliosis 時間: 2025-3-29 18:14
2211-4548 e most part we lead our lives, not simply to inferential practice in science, where they are now standard, but to epistemic inference in other contexts as well. Although the argument is rigorous, it is also acc978-3-319-27770-7978-3-319-27772-1Series ISSN 2211-4548 Series E-ISSN 2211-4556
