標題: Titlebook: Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science; Erik J. Olsson,Sebastian Enqvist Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 AGM Theo [打印本頁] 作者: FORGE 時間: 2025-3-21 19:14
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science被引頻次
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science年度引用
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science讀者反饋
書目名稱Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Supplement 時間: 2025-3-21 23:03 作者: bromide 時間: 2025-3-22 03:39
Industrie 4.0 in der Textilproduktionherence, which shows how political and economic goals can bias the evaluation of evidence and produce irrational rejection of claims about global warming. Finally, we argue that explanatory coherence gives a better account of belief revision than major alternatives including logicist and Bayesian theories.作者: Panther 時間: 2025-3-22 05:50
Book 2011ly) in the light of new evidence. Yet these two areas of research have long seemed strangely detached from each other, as witnessed by the small number of cross-references and researchers working in both domains.One may speculate as to what has brought about this surprising, and perhaps unfortunate,作者: 友好關(guān)系 時間: 2025-3-22 10:52
Dieter Steegmüller,Michael Zürnds. Finally, I argue that part of what feeds the functionalist-relationalist controversy is a false dilemma based on an implausible conception of what it means rationally to suspend judgment. Making this precise requires a formal framework that includes a representation of the agent’s research agenda.作者: 顯而易見 時間: 2025-3-22 14:56 作者: Enrage 時間: 2025-3-22 19:55 作者: Leaven 時間: 2025-3-23 00:49 作者: Jacket 時間: 2025-3-23 01:40 作者: Lumbar-Spine 時間: 2025-3-23 09:16 作者: forbid 時間: 2025-3-23 13:06 作者: 觀察 時間: 2025-3-23 14:17
Idealizations, Intertheory Explanations and Conditionals,al conditionals and ’because’-sentences featuring in such intertheory explanations. Pre-theoretically described idealizing assumptions play a crucial role in this model, especially when the predecessor theory and the successor theory contradict each other.作者: CAMP 時間: 2025-3-23 18:30 作者: arterioles 時間: 2025-3-24 00:27
Book 2011 state of affairs. One factor may be that while belief revision theory has traditionally been pursued in a bottom- up manner, focusing on the endeavors of single inquirers, philosophers of science, inspired by logical empiricism, have tended to be more interested in science as a multi-agent or agent-independent phenomenon.作者: Gustatory 時間: 2025-3-24 06:18
2214-9775 likely to steer research in new directions Establishes new cBelief revision theory and philosophy of science both aspire to shed light on the dynamics ofknowledge – on how our view of the world changes (typically) in the light of new evidence. Yet these two areas of research have long seemed strange作者: Femine 時間: 2025-3-24 09:36
Industrie 4.0 in der praktischen Anwendung entrenchment relation ., a .., i.e. a set of questions satisfying certain corpus-relative preconditions (hence called .-questions) the agent would like to have answers to. Informally, the preconditions guarantee that the set of potential answers represent a partition of possible expansions of ., hence are equivalent to well-behaved sets of ..作者: 褪色 時間: 2025-3-24 12:12
Industrie 4.0 in der Automobilproduktionrom the function of states of full belief. We should not expect that the characterization of knowledge in the two cases should be the same or that conflict between the two can be settled by appeal to “our ordinary” concept of knowledge. (There is no such thing.)作者: 改進 時間: 2025-3-24 17:32
Assistenzsysteme in der Textilproduktion,research program co-exists with another major research program concerned with the belief and knowledge of rational agents, namely doxastic and epistemic logic. With respect to epistemic logic, in . (1988), Peter G?rdenfors remarked:作者: ordain 時間: 2025-3-24 19:29
,Chancen durch neue Gesch?ftsmodelle,ory of science. The topic here is methodological change, and what kind of theory of rational methodological change is appropriate. The modest ambition of this paper is to discuss in what ways results in formal theories of belief revision can throw light on the question of what an appropriate theory of methodological change would look like.作者: 預(yù)知 時間: 2025-3-25 03:14
The Best of All PossibleWorlds: Where Interrogative Games Meet Research Agendas, entrenchment relation ., a .., i.e. a set of questions satisfying certain corpus-relative preconditions (hence called .-questions) the agent would like to have answers to. Informally, the preconditions guarantee that the set of potential answers represent a partition of possible expansions of ., hence are equivalent to well-behaved sets of ..作者: Ballad 時間: 2025-3-25 05:29 作者: DEMN 時間: 2025-3-25 07:41
Reasoning About Belief Revision,research program co-exists with another major research program concerned with the belief and knowledge of rational agents, namely doxastic and epistemic logic. With respect to epistemic logic, in . (1988), Peter G?rdenfors remarked:作者: resuscitation 時間: 2025-3-25 12:13 作者: 排名真古怪 時間: 2025-3-25 17:47 作者: SHOCK 時間: 2025-3-25 23:04
Changing the Scientific Corpus,ely the dynamics of changes in scientific knowledge. But in spite of this connection, there has been relatively little contact between the two disciplines. There is an obvious reason for this lack of contact: The standard framework that is used in the belief change literature is not suitable for ana作者: Gingivitis 時間: 2025-3-26 01:38
Idealizations, Intertheory Explanations and Conditionals, point of view of a successor theory, its predecessor theory’s success (where it is successful) as well as the latter’s failure (where it fails) at the same time. A variation of the Ramsey-test is used, together with a standard AGM belief revision model, to give a semantics for open and counterfactu作者: 蛙鳴聲 時間: 2025-3-26 05:05
Abductive Belief Revision in Science, hypotheses from new evidences. After a discussion of two approaches to implement such learning mechanisms into input-driven belief revision, and of alternative accounts in terms of deliberate belief revision, an account of input-driven abductive belief expansion and revision is develop which intend作者: jagged 時間: 2025-3-26 12:31 作者: EXUDE 時間: 2025-3-26 13:50 作者: 假設(shè) 時間: 2025-3-26 18:52
A Note on Theory Change and Belief Revision,w has been repeatedly challenged, with structures, capacities, mechanisms, and perhaps also ontologies and processes competing to take the place of laws. But rather than taking part in that debate, I wish to look into a matter that is epistemologically prior to it, namely how various sciences select作者: Fillet,Filet 時間: 2025-3-26 23:46 作者: Spina-Bifida 時間: 2025-3-27 04:08 作者: upstart 時間: 2025-3-27 05:33
The Best of All PossibleWorlds: Where Interrogative Games Meet Research Agendas,to adequately model an epistemic state one needs, in addition to a belief set (or corpus, or theory, i.e. a set closed under deduction) . and (say) an entrenchment relation ., a .., i.e. a set of questions satisfying certain corpus-relative preconditions (hence called .-questions) the agent would li作者: MUTE 時間: 2025-3-27 10:21
Functional vs. Relational Approaches to Belief Revision,Roughly, functionalists hold that the result of revising a cognitive state with some new datum is a unique rationally determined belief state. Relationalists disagree. In their view, there may be several rationally admissible results of revising a cognitive state with a given datum. In an attempt to作者: 沉著 時間: 2025-3-27 14:29 作者: Seminar 時間: 2025-3-27 21:46 作者: 膽小懦夫 時間: 2025-3-28 01:17 作者: capsule 時間: 2025-3-28 02:41 作者: 盤旋 時間: 2025-3-28 08:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21118-9s”. In this paper Alchourron, G?rdenfors, and Makinson investigate the properties that such a method should have in order to be intuitively appealing. The result was a set of postulates (named AGM postulates after the initials of the authors) that every belief change operator should satisfy. The “AG作者: 拾落穗 時間: 2025-3-28 13:10
Industrie 4.0 – eine Bestandsaufnahmeely the dynamics of changes in scientific knowledge. But in spite of this connection, there has been relatively little contact between the two disciplines. There is an obvious reason for this lack of contact: The standard framework that is used in the belief change literature is not suitable for ana作者: 舊石器 時間: 2025-3-28 15:39
Das Digital Enterprise nimmt Gestalt an point of view of a successor theory, its predecessor theory’s success (where it is successful) as well as the latter’s failure (where it fails) at the same time. A variation of the Ramsey-test is used, together with a standard AGM belief revision model, to give a semantics for open and counterfactu作者: fender 時間: 2025-3-28 19:58
Das Digital Enterprise nimmt Gestalt an hypotheses from new evidences. After a discussion of two approaches to implement such learning mechanisms into input-driven belief revision, and of alternative accounts in terms of deliberate belief revision, an account of input-driven abductive belief expansion and revision is develop which intend作者: 龍蝦 時間: 2025-3-29 01:27 作者: BINGE 時間: 2025-3-29 06:11 作者: 橡子 時間: 2025-3-29 09:37 作者: Judicious 時間: 2025-3-29 14:52 作者: aerial 時間: 2025-3-29 17:57
Karl-Heinz Büttner,Ulrich Brücksumption that the collective should change its belief in α if all its members change their belief in α. It is also shown that some very reasonable assumptions about the collective beliefs results in an inconsistency.作者: Conflict 時間: 2025-3-29 22:48 作者: AVOW 時間: 2025-3-30 02:09 作者: 期滿 時間: 2025-3-30 04:05 作者: 失敗主義者 時間: 2025-3-30 10:50
Assistenzsysteme in der Textilproduktion,igated theories of rational belief change; for a comprehensive presentation and references see Hansson (1999) and Rott (2001). This highly successful research program co-exists with another major research program concerned with the belief and knowledge of rational agents, namely doxastic and epistem
