標題: Titlebook: Being and Not-Being; An Introduction to P Paul Seligman Book 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974 Parmenides.Plato.dialogue.i [打印本頁] 作者: Malnutrition 時間: 2025-3-21 16:04
書目名稱Being and Not-Being影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Being and Not-Being影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Being and Not-Being網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Being and Not-Being網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Being and Not-Being被引頻次
書目名稱Being and Not-Being被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Being and Not-Being年度引用
書目名稱Being and Not-Being年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Being and Not-Being讀者反饋
書目名稱Being and Not-Being讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 兩種語言 時間: 2025-3-21 22:16 作者: FACET 時間: 2025-3-22 02:35 作者: Notify 時間: 2025-3-22 05:20 作者: visceral-fat 時間: 2025-3-22 10:14 作者: Firefly 時間: 2025-3-22 16:51 作者: 啪心兒跳動 時間: 2025-3-22 17:46
978-90-247-1580-0Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974作者: BINGE 時間: 2025-3-22 23:15 作者: conformity 時間: 2025-3-23 04:38 作者: 半身雕像 時間: 2025-3-23 09:28
,The very great Kinds — Part 2: 255E–251A,, p. 21 above). In making good his challenge he will also hit the Sophist and his band of pseudo-Eleatics, “l(fā)ate learners” and contradiction mongers. Being and not-being do combine, “is” and “is-not” statements are compatible, in fact imply one another, and their contradiction is merely apparent.作者: 返老還童 時間: 2025-3-23 11:07
,The Not-Beautiful, the Not-Just and the Not-Tall: 257B–258C,t from” he asks us to grant that we do not mean by “that which is-not” something contrary (opposed, .) to what is but something that is different [from it] (257 B3 f.). From this it only takes a short step to the general axiom作者: 驕傲 時間: 2025-3-23 14:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6368-8 A large section of contemporary philosophy is concerned with logical and linguistic analysis, and there can be little doubt that the . raises problems in these areas which are of considerable relevance even to-day. As a consequence, it is the logical and linguistic aspects of the dialogue that have作者: 主動脈 時間: 2025-3-23 20:56 作者: Medley 時間: 2025-3-23 23:00 作者: 機構(gòu) 時間: 2025-3-24 04:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6368-8t of semblance making, the art of deception. But although it has been suggested that this involves a . of not-being with being, we are as yet nowhere near to establishing even the possibility of this position.作者: 階層 時間: 2025-3-24 09:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6368-8t. The present discussion is to clear the air for the eventual dissolution of the being/not-being dichotomy. Moreover it has special significance in so far as Plato’s criticisms of Parmenidean being will with equal force apply to the Parmenidoid character of his own classical form conception (cp. p.作者: 共和國 時間: 2025-3-24 11:24 作者: Iniquitous 時間: 2025-3-24 18:43
Inclusion in Post-Conflict Legislatureson (.) of being. It is at this point that the Stranger confesses that he is still in the dark about being (249 E2-3). The discussion which now follows hinges on the distinction between the intension and the extension of being (cp. p. 37 above). In referring to the former Plato speaks of being “accor作者: 刻苦讀書 時間: 2025-3-24 21:07
Ethnicity in Northern Ireland and Kosovo,gan by searching for a definition of the Sophist. We seemed to be pretty close to it when we discerned him as an arch-deceiver, a fabricator of semblances and falsehoods. But at that stage he met us with the puzzle that no statement can be false; for to say what is false is to say what is-not, and w作者: 泄露 時間: 2025-3-25 00:35 作者: JOT 時間: 2025-3-25 05:12
Gladys I. Ayaya,Tsediso M. Makoelleabove) he had argued that being cannot be equated with either motion or rest, nor with motion and rest together, but is a third thing. At 254 D7-12 he reaches the conclusion that each of the three is a distinct kind since two (motion and rest) cannot mingle with one another, while being mingles with作者: 無情 時間: 2025-3-25 09:08 作者: osteopath 時間: 2025-3-25 14:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5073-0, p. 21 above). In making good his challenge he will also hit the Sophist and his band of pseudo-Eleatics, “l(fā)ate learners” and contradiction mongers. Being and not-being do combine, “is” and “is-not” statements are compatible, in fact imply one another, and their contradiction is merely apparent.作者: Overthrow 時間: 2025-3-25 17:10 作者: ABIDE 時間: 2025-3-25 20:46 作者: heterodox 時間: 2025-3-26 02:59 作者: Externalize 時間: 2025-3-26 05:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5073-0, p. 21 above). In making good his challenge he will also hit the Sophist and his band of pseudo-Eleatics, “l(fā)ate learners” and contradiction mongers. Being and not-being do combine, “is” and “is-not” statements are compatible, in fact imply one another, and their contradiction is merely apparent.作者: Erythropoietin 時間: 2025-3-26 11:37 作者: NOCT 時間: 2025-3-26 14:04
‘Giving up on Them’: A Tale of DespairThe “reverend and awful” figure of Parmenides (.. 183 E6) looms large over Plato’s final encounter with the Sophists. Parmenides’ influence on Greek philosophy was profound. The core of his doctrine can be summarised in three statements which we take from his . .; I will call them the Eleatic canon:作者: bronchodilator 時間: 2025-3-26 20:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6368-8In order to unmask the Sophist we need to understand his art. To understand his art we must define it, and to define it we need to employ the method of division. Right from the start the scene is set against the background of the new science of dialectic.作者: 單色 時間: 2025-3-26 22:31 作者: 發(fā)怨言 時間: 2025-3-27 03:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6368-8This section may conveniently be introduced by recalling an earlier quotation regarding the position of the idealists (246 B9-C2):作者: 免除責任 時間: 2025-3-27 06:22 作者: 閃光你我 時間: 2025-3-27 13:22 作者: Detain 時間: 2025-3-27 14:37
Parmenides, Plato and the Sophists,The “reverend and awful” figure of Parmenides (.. 183 E6) looms large over Plato’s final encounter with the Sophists. Parmenides’ influence on Greek philosophy was profound. The core of his doctrine can be summarised in three statements which we take from his . .; I will call them the Eleatic canon:作者: 錫箔紙 時間: 2025-3-27 18:02
,The seventh Division and the Statement of the Problem: 233D–237B,In order to unmask the Sophist we need to understand his art. To understand his art we must define it, and to define it we need to employ the method of division. Right from the start the scene is set against the background of the new science of dialectic.作者: Admonish 時間: 2025-3-28 01:29 作者: mendacity 時間: 2025-3-28 03:26
,Being, Forms and Motion: 248A–249D,This section may conveniently be introduced by recalling an earlier quotation regarding the position of the idealists (246 B9-C2):作者: Electrolysis 時間: 2025-3-28 08:53 作者: 紳士 時間: 2025-3-28 11:45
Motion and Rest once more: 256B6-C4,In the course of the preceding argument we find the following passage which calls for separate discussion:作者: 加花粗鄙人 時間: 2025-3-28 16:09 作者: apiary 時間: 2025-3-28 18:48 作者: 為敵 時間: 2025-3-29 01:01 作者: kyphoplasty 時間: 2025-3-29 06:38
,Being — the Monists (Parmenides): 244B–245E,o far as Plato’s criticisms of Parmenidean being will with equal force apply to the Parmenidoid character of his own classical form conception (cp. p. 10 above). The section can conveniently be divided into two parts.作者: 抱狗不敢前 時間: 2025-3-29 08:29 作者: Omniscient 時間: 2025-3-29 13:52
‘Giving up on Them’: A Tale of Despaird have to answer the first question in terms of an indefinite plurality of things that are, and this would be a sufficient reason for Plato to affirm that their account is not exact. Their significance lies in their answer to the second question: what is the nature, the essence of things that are.作者: 本能 時間: 2025-3-29 15:49 作者: 美麗的寫 時間: 2025-3-29 20:54 作者: 鉤針織物 時間: 2025-3-30 00:18 作者: 漫不經(jīng)心 時間: 2025-3-30 06:03
,Can we define Being?: 249D–251A, being (.) which we should express by drawing a circle, inside which we place the things which are (.), i.e. we literally encircle them. We meet the same term again later in the dialogue in precisely the same sense: In the section on dialectic we shall hear of “forms encircled from without by one form” (253 D7 f., p. 53 below).作者: 心胸開闊 時間: 2025-3-30 09:37 作者: 調(diào)味品 時間: 2025-3-30 14:31 作者: 遍及 時間: 2025-3-30 20:14 作者: pacific 時間: 2025-3-30 23:25 作者: agitate 時間: 2025-3-31 02:12 作者: coagulate 時間: 2025-3-31 06:44
,Being — Materialists and Idealists: 245E–248A,d have to answer the first question in terms of an indefinite plurality of things that are, and this would be a sufficient reason for Plato to affirm that their account is not exact. Their significance lies in their answer to the second question: what is the nature, the essence of things that are.作者: 異端邪說下 時間: 2025-3-31 11:50
,The Communion of Forms and the “Late Learners”: 251A–252E,hat is-not, . Parmenides, can neither be thought nor be uttered, so that all statements must be true. Thus it became necessary to challenge Parmenides’ canon. In order to tackle the Sophist we must show作者: aphasia 時間: 2025-3-31 14:10
,The very great Kinds — Part 1: 254D–255E, both, for both motion and rest are. The incompatibility of motion and rest — “cannot mingle with one another” — is here reaffirmed. At this point the Stranger seems to accord equal status to the three kinds. He now continues:作者: hematuria 時間: 2025-3-31 21:16
Approach to Plato, A large section of contemporary philosophy is concerned with logical and linguistic analysis, and there can be little doubt that the . raises problems in these areas which are of considerable relevance even to-day. As a consequence, it is the logical and linguistic aspects of the dialogue that have作者: 感情脆弱 時間: 2025-3-31 21:44
,Absolute Not-being: 237B–239C,ntually his own non-Parmenidean interpretation of not-being. The Stranger begins by noting that we do not hesitate to utter the expression, but to what can it be applied? Surely not to anything that is, and therefore not to “something” For we use the word “something” of something that is, not in “na作者: 舊病復發(fā) 時間: 2025-4-1 03:30 作者: 共同給與 時間: 2025-4-1 08:42
,False Logos and the Challenge to Parmenides: 240C–242B,t of semblance making, the art of deception. But although it has been suggested that this involves a . of not-being with being, we are as yet nowhere near to establishing even the possibility of this position.
