標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Beg to Differ; The Logic of Dispute Joseph Agassi,Abraham Meidan Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 Argumentative [打印本頁] 作者: Maculate 時間: 2025-3-21 18:04
書目名稱Beg to Differ影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Beg to Differ影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beg to Differ網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Beg to Differ網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beg to Differ被引頻次
書目名稱Beg to Differ被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beg to Differ年度引用
書目名稱Beg to Differ年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Beg to Differ讀者反饋
書目名稱Beg to Differ讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 通便 時間: 2025-3-21 21:38
Hohle oder gerade Wasserlinien? background information proves not to be adequately clear and the debate starts getting frustrating, then it is always possible to take a step back and discuss the background material a bit more before proceeding.作者: 古董 時間: 2025-3-22 01:56 作者: 背信 時間: 2025-3-22 07:55
Hohle oder gerade Wasserlinien?at begins with a question word and ends with a question mark). Questions with vague wording such as, “how about x, y or z?” are better not taken up. The same goes for unspecified questions, like the question of this or that topic or person or situation. Do not debate definitions of concepts. Instead作者: 多節(jié) 時間: 2025-3-22 10:38
Theorie des Reibungswiderstandes prove that one is consistent), and those who claim that a certain generalization is false should point at cases that refute it (there is no way to prove a factual generalization). Finally, the side that presents an existential statement (X exists) bears the burden of proof.作者: 不愿 時間: 2025-3-22 13:56
Ein Beitrag zum Schiffswellenwiderstandeck which answer is simpler; of two theories that explain the same items, the simpler is usually preferred. Check also whether the theory under dispute successfully predicts previously unknown surprising facts or rather just explains known facts (the latter is much the easier one). Avoid debates wit作者: 賠償 時間: 2025-3-22 19:45 作者: 歪曲道理 時間: 2025-3-22 21:13 作者: enterprise 時間: 2025-3-23 03:09 作者: Exclaim 時間: 2025-3-23 06:46 作者: FILLY 時間: 2025-3-23 09:48
Separation of Dissolved Metals, extent to which its adoption rests on the hope that acting on it will increase human welfare. Such understanding can help clarify some rather abstract notions that might otherwise disrupt such debates.作者: 信任 時間: 2025-3-23 17:19 作者: modest 時間: 2025-3-23 19:06
Joseph Agassi,Abraham MeidanTrains to avoid argumentative.Guides how to render debates.enjoyable, instructive and beneficial.Reviewspopular disputes, points at their fallacies and suggests how to reconstructthem作者: LATE 時間: 2025-3-23 23:05 作者: Missile 時間: 2025-3-24 03:50 作者: 愛好 時間: 2025-3-24 06:41
Theorie des Reibungswiderstandes prove that one is consistent), and those who claim that a certain generalization is false should point at cases that refute it (there is no way to prove a factual generalization). Finally, the side that presents an existential statement (X exists) bears the burden of proof.作者: 創(chuàng)作 時間: 2025-3-24 13:04
General Engineering Statistics,ch of the possible options that the competing answers offer, yet disagree about the benefits of these advantages and the cost of these disadvantages. Such disputes are usually not theoretical, and then disputants may try to concentrate on evaluating these costs and benefits.作者: Insulin 時間: 2025-3-24 15:31
Separation of Dissolved Metals, extent to which its adoption rests on the hope that acting on it will increase human welfare. Such understanding can help clarify some rather abstract notions that might otherwise disrupt such debates.作者: 微塵 時間: 2025-3-24 21:52 作者: 凹處 時間: 2025-3-25 03:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33307-6Argumentative Frustration; Enjoyable Debates; Debating Instruction; Popular Disputes; Debate Training作者: 除草劑 時間: 2025-3-25 06:56
978-3-319-33306-9Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016作者: 虛度 時間: 2025-3-25 08:34 作者: Systemic 時間: 2025-3-25 12:21
The Burden of Proof, prove that one is consistent), and those who claim that a certain generalization is false should point at cases that refute it (there is no way to prove a factual generalization). Finally, the side that presents an existential statement (X exists) bears the burden of proof.作者: 格子架 時間: 2025-3-25 16:55 作者: compassion 時間: 2025-3-25 21:16 作者: 表臉 時間: 2025-3-26 00:49 作者: 抑制 時間: 2025-3-26 06:03 作者: 火花 時間: 2025-3-26 12:08 作者: 態(tài)度暖昧 時間: 2025-3-26 14:20 作者: 尖叫 時間: 2025-3-26 18:43 作者: CRATE 時間: 2025-3-26 22:47
Conclusion,Avoid frustrating debates. Avoid arguing with dogmatists and more so avoid arguing with relativists. Learn to enjoy and benefit from debates by recording your impressions from debates soon after they take place.作者: Rejuvenate 時間: 2025-3-27 04:46 作者: 絕食 時間: 2025-3-27 09:03 作者: 美食家 時間: 2025-3-27 12:15
Disputes About Statistical Generalizations,rior to debating assertions that explain certain event, investigate first the assertion that the event in question is due to a mere accident. Avoid debates on causality (unless your concern is philosophical). Discussing the degree to which the appearance of one variable makes us expect the appearance of another usually suffices.作者: defendant 時間: 2025-3-27 15:35 作者: 招致 時間: 2025-3-27 21:31
KNona C. Liddell,Renato G. Bautistaive conditional statements (answers to questions of the form “what would have happened if …?” of the form “if x were the case than y would be too”), it is advisable to consider the degree to which one event usually serves as means for predicting the other. This advice resembles the above-mentioned one about causality.作者: botany 時間: 2025-3-28 01:14 作者: 逗它小傻瓜 時間: 2025-3-28 04:30 作者: 無禮回復(fù) 時間: 2025-3-28 08:46
Disputes About General Facts and Theories,h people who repeatedly change the wording of their assertions in response to refutations by applying ad hoc corrections to them, especially those who pretend that these corrections are mere clarifications. In general, adversaries who admit error frankly are preferable; more so those who admit error with no fuss.作者: Mettle 時間: 2025-3-28 11:30
Disputes About History and Predictions,ive conditional statements (answers to questions of the form “what would have happened if …?” of the form “if x were the case than y would be too”), it is advisable to consider the degree to which one event usually serves as means for predicting the other. This advice resembles the above-mentioned one about causality.作者: Disk199 時間: 2025-3-28 15:41
stimulating, and we trust that implementing the rules ofdebate outlined in this book will help you and your friends increase yourability to learn, improve and engage in rational and intellectual debates..978-3-319-33306-9978-3-319-33307-6作者: garrulous 時間: 2025-3-28 21:16
Book 2016tration that many experience when engaging in debates. The properconduct of debate is both fun and mentally stimulating, and we trust that implementing the rules ofdebate outlined in this book will help you and your friends increase yourability to learn, improve and engage in rational and intellectu作者: Cervical-Spine 時間: 2025-3-28 23:01
On the Frustration That Debates Cause,ld be fruitful and therefore enjoyable. Nevertheless, it is true: disputes can be frustrating. This book lists practical recommendations for rules that help avoid frustrating debates and construct fruitful ones.作者: ellagic-acid 時間: 2025-3-29 06:50 作者: 政府 時間: 2025-3-29 09:05 作者: 脫水 時間: 2025-3-29 14:46
Disputes About General Facts and Theories,eck which answer is simpler; of two theories that explain the same items, the simpler is usually preferred. Check also whether the theory under dispute successfully predicts previously unknown surprising facts or rather just explains known facts (the latter is much the easier one). Avoid debates wit作者: 模仿 時間: 2025-3-29 19:15 作者: Factorable 時間: 2025-3-29 21:11
Metaphysical Disputes,r-arguments; they may, however, suggest to advocates of the metaphysical opinions under dispute to reconsider their views. Some views, mainly metaphysical, refer to claims about future events (for example: one day, it will be possible to construct conscious machines). In debates on such predictions,作者: IRK 時間: 2025-3-30 01:50
