標題: Titlebook: Basic Geometry of Voting; Donald G. Saari Book 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995 Apportionment Methods.Election.Electoral.Entsch [打印本頁] 作者: 面臨 時間: 2025-3-21 19:48
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting被引頻次
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting年度引用
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting讀者反饋
書目名稱Basic Geometry of Voting讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Abrupt 時間: 2025-3-21 21:20
Positional Voting and the BC,ds manage to drop the central assumption of transitivity. This suggests using methods, such as the plurality vote and the BC, which admit only rational voters. Do they have problems? Rest assured; there are plenty of them! But, with a further decomposition of profiles, it becomes easy to analyze the problems and create profile examples.作者: 星球的光亮度 時間: 2025-3-22 03:57 作者: 極肥胖 時間: 2025-3-22 07:30 作者: assail 時間: 2025-3-22 09:25 作者: 最初 時間: 2025-3-22 16:42
Inés Romero-Brey,Volker LohmannIt is trivial to tally a plurality election; just count how many voters have each candidate top-ranked. Surprisingly, when this elementary description is used to analyze the procedure, it quickly introduces mathematical complications that severely limit what can be learned.作者: misanthrope 時間: 2025-3-22 18:10
Daisuke Yamane,Stanley M. LemonBy no means are the following references complete; they are places to start. In addition to these suggestions and their references, I recommend Kelly’s . [K3].作者: 暗指 時間: 2025-3-22 21:47
From an Election Fable to Election Procedures,What could be easier than interpreting an election? You just count to determine which candidate receives the most votes. What can be difficult about something so elementary? After all, even nursery school children know how to vote to select their juice of choice before nap time.作者: 古董 時間: 2025-3-23 02:30
Geometry for Positional and Pairwise Voting,It is trivial to tally a plurality election; just count how many voters have each candidate top-ranked. Surprisingly, when this elementary description is used to analyze the procedure, it quickly introduces mathematical complications that severely limit what can be learned.作者: 嘲弄 時間: 2025-3-23 07:51
Notes,By no means are the following references complete; they are places to start. In addition to these suggestions and their references, I recommend Kelly’s . [K3].作者: 高射炮 時間: 2025-3-23 09:46
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/181031.jpg作者: 觀察 時間: 2025-3-23 15:06 作者: gospel 時間: 2025-3-23 18:23
Cell Culture Systems for Propagation of HCVds manage to drop the central assumption of transitivity. This suggests using methods, such as the plurality vote and the BC, which admit only rational voters. Do they have problems? Rest assured; there are plenty of them! But, with a further decomposition of profiles, it becomes easy to analyze the作者: ELUC 時間: 2025-3-23 23:11 作者: EVICT 時間: 2025-3-24 02:57 作者: Preserve 時間: 2025-3-24 07:21
978-3-540-60064-0Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995作者: tariff 時間: 2025-3-24 13:18
Book 1995ook is directed toward students and others wishing to learn about voting, experts will discover previously unpublished results. As an example, a new profile decomposition quickly resolves two centuries old controversies of Condorcet and Borda, demonstrates, that the rankings of pairwise and other me作者: nonplus 時間: 2025-3-24 16:32
Book 1995s the famous Arrow`s Theorem predictable, and simplifies the construction of examples. The geometry unifies seemingly disparate topics as manipulation, monotonicity, and even the apportionment issues of the US Supreme Court.作者: PANT 時間: 2025-3-24 22:58
ield, makes the famous Arrow`s Theorem predictable, and simplifies the construction of examples. The geometry unifies seemingly disparate topics as manipulation, monotonicity, and even the apportionment issues of the US Supreme Court.978-3-540-60064-0978-3-642-57748-2作者: Aggregate 時間: 2025-3-25 00:05 作者: 拘留 時間: 2025-3-25 07:14
Other Voting Issues, of profile sets, whenever possible, the simpler geometry of the representation triangle or cube is exploited. Then, to conclude, Sects. 5.4, 5.5 address the intriguing problems of the “l(fā)ist” methods and apportionment of Congressional seats.作者: 使害羞 時間: 2025-3-25 09:32 作者: 砍伐 時間: 2025-3-25 12:49
The Problem with Condorcet, department’s plurality ranking conflicts with their rankings of pairs of beverages. The radical disagreement raises interesting theoretical questions. How does a majority vote ranking of a pair relate to its relative ranking within a plurality outcome? Can anything go wrong with pairwise rankings?作者: 財產(chǎn) 時間: 2025-3-25 19:46 作者: 貞潔 時間: 2025-3-25 22:18 作者: visual-cortex 時間: 2025-3-26 01:51
7樓作者: Inkling 時間: 2025-3-26 06:33
7樓作者: Frisky 時間: 2025-3-26 11:41
7樓作者: exceed 時間: 2025-3-26 16:25
7樓作者: Ovulation 時間: 2025-3-26 17:04
8樓作者: Bravura 時間: 2025-3-26 23:49
8樓作者: 常到 時間: 2025-3-27 01:20
8樓作者: GLOSS 時間: 2025-3-27 07:40
9樓作者: 有偏見 時間: 2025-3-27 11:06
9樓作者: 損壞 時間: 2025-3-27 17:28
9樓作者: overture 時間: 2025-3-27 19:58
9樓作者: Ambulatory 時間: 2025-3-27 23:13
10樓作者: 圣人 時間: 2025-3-28 04:10
10樓作者: 體貼 時間: 2025-3-28 07:00
10樓作者: 心神不寧 時間: 2025-3-28 12:34
10樓
