標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Bargaining Power; Health Policymaking Verna Smith Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Health Policy in England [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Mottled 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:12
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Bargaining Power影響因子(影響力)
作者: NOT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:21 作者: 重疊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:33 作者: 言行自由 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:42
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328144. Negotiated between the British Medical Association and the state between 2001 and 2004, the detailed story of its design is told in rich detail, often in the voices of the policymakers. Drawing on insights from 12 qualitative interviews with participating or proximate policymakers in England, the 作者: innate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14492-1n and unclear technology, and entrepreneurs are able to exploit this uncertainty in brief windows. These hypotheses are challenged in this case study of policymaking in England between 2001 and 2004. Both the Multiple Streams Framework and five single-approach theories of policy change (institutions作者: 不出名 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:04
Health and Health Care in Britainwas also being designed in New Zealand between the Ministry of Health and advisory groups of primary care stakeholders. Drawing on insights from 14 qualitative interviews with proximate policymakers, the context of and background to the policymaking are set out. The intentions of policymakers and th作者: 配置 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:45 作者: Melatonin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:13 作者: miniature 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:37 作者: 憂傷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:59
Verna SmithDescribes pay for performance policy making episodes conducted in the national health systems of England and New Zealand.Conveys striking lessons for health policymakers about how to negotiate success作者: 統(tǒng)治人類(lèi) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:45 作者: 讓你明白 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:20 作者: Occlusion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:50 作者: 浪蕩子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:56 作者: 自愛(ài) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:49
Antonia Parmeggiani,Evamaria Lanzarinis research takes on the challenge to test two core hypotheses of the Framework: the conditions required for non-incremental change and the need for policy entrepreneurs to couple three streams at the agenda-setting phase. The findings of the research challenge these hypotheses and make the case for refinement of the Framework.作者: 受辱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:32 作者: 減少 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:41 作者: 經(jīng)典 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:25
The Rise and Fall of the Mutual Jungle,l. However, it fails to encourage recognition of the powerful institutional and interest group factors or the influence of history at work. Amendments to the Framework reflecting historical antecedents, ownership and governance arrangements, and the role of state-appointed institutional entrepreneurs are recommended.作者: affinity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:28 作者: 天然熱噴泉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:33
,Analysing Public Policy: Does Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework Help?,s research takes on the challenge to test two core hypotheses of the Framework: the conditions required for non-incremental change and the need for policy entrepreneurs to couple three streams at the agenda-setting phase. The findings of the research challenge these hypotheses and make the case for refinement of the Framework.作者: backdrop 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:15
A Comparison of the English and New Zealand General Practice Sub-Systems,etween general practitioners and the state in England is contrasted with the growth of a multi-payer system in New Zealand in which general practitioners had a fractious relationship and no formal partnership with the state.作者: Aggressive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:55
,Utility of Kingdon’s Framework: Policymaking in England,e. Kingdon’s Framework is the most useful approach but fails to encourage recognition of the powerful institutional and interest group factors at work. Amendments to the Framework to reflect ownership and governance arrangements and the role of state-appointed institutional entrepreneurs are recommended.作者: Eviction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:27
,Utility of Kingdon’s Framework: Policymaking in New Zealand,l. However, it fails to encourage recognition of the powerful institutional and interest group factors or the influence of history at work. Amendments to the Framework reflecting historical antecedents, ownership and governance arrangements, and the role of state-appointed institutional entrepreneurs are recommended.作者: agonist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:12 作者: 闖入 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:31
A Tale of Two Countries,g the comparative utility of single-approach theories that cite the influence of institutions, interest groups, the rational choices made by individuals, ideas or socio-economic factors, and a multi-theoretic approach, John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework.作者: 思考而得 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:51 作者: 終止 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:36
New Zealand: Context and the Performance Programme,e detailed story of the process to bring these to fruition are told in rich detail, often in the voices of the policymakers. The reader is allowed to see who was involved, what was done, how it was done and how it was implemented. Significant barriers that threatened the process and enablers that supported it are described and discussed.作者: 不遵守 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:27
Conclusion,and New Zealand between 2001 and 2007. Rare rich descriptions of public policymaking in the general practice sub-systems of these two countries are delivered, offering many insights of both practical and theoretical assistance to those interested in the dynamics of policymaking.作者: EPT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:03
stminster majoritarian jurisdictions is tested and, based on rigorous comparative analysis, recommendations are made for its refinement.?.The monograph also offers striking lessons for policymakers about how to negotiate successfully with general practitioners.??.978-981-10-7602-2作者: cylinder 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:07
Book 2018ucted in England and New Zealand. The Framework’s explanatory power for policymaking in Westminster majoritarian jurisdictions is tested and, based on rigorous comparative analysis, recommendations are made for its refinement.?.The monograph also offers striking lessons for policymakers about how to作者: stratum-corneum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:10
Book 2018 rigorous comparative analysis, recommendations are made for its refinement.?.The monograph also offers striking lessons for policymakers about how to negotiate successfully with general practitioners.??.作者: 皮薩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:52
The Woman in the History of Healthg the comparative utility of single-approach theories that cite the influence of institutions, interest groups, the rational choices made by individuals, ideas or socio-economic factors, and a multi-theoretic approach, John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework.作者: 增長(zhǎng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:17
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328144context and background to the policymaking is set out and the transformative intentions of policymakers revealed. The reader is allowed to see who was involved, what was done, how it was done and how it was implemented. Significant barriers which threatened the process, and enablers which supported it, are described and discussed.作者: Enteropathic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:56
Health and Health Care in Britaine detailed story of the process to bring these to fruition are told in rich detail, often in the voices of the policymakers. The reader is allowed to see who was involved, what was done, how it was done and how it was implemented. Significant barriers that threatened the process and enablers that supported it are described and discussed.作者: Monocle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:52 作者: Dna262 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:27
A Tale of Two Countries,lling comparative analysis of two case studies of pay-for-performance policymaking within general practice in similar countries, England and New Zealand, uncovers the drivers of each policymaking process and the reasons for differing outcomes. An innovative analytical framework is introduced, testin作者: 下垂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:55
,Analysing Public Policy: Does Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework Help?,structural and agency-based theories. However, the Framework has attracted much critical commentary, particularly for its neglect of institutional dynamics and the importance of history in policymaking processes. Its five central elements of policies, politics, problems, policy windows and policy en作者: Brochure 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:05
A Comparison of the English and New Zealand General Practice Sub-Systems,the general practice sub-systems of the English and New Zealand national health services are compared and contrasting features identified in order to understand their differing processes of policymaking. Despite many similarities at their time of origin and in recent episodes of health policy reform作者: accordance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:29
England: Context and the Quality and Outcomes Framework,. Negotiated between the British Medical Association and the state between 2001 and 2004, the detailed story of its design is told in rich detail, often in the voices of the policymakers. Drawing on insights from 12 qualitative interviews with participating or proximate policymakers in England, the 作者: Ancillary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:52 作者: cruise 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:48 作者: 無(wú)節(jié)奏 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:21
,Utility of Kingdon’s Framework: Policymaking in New Zealand,w Zealand case study of pay-for-performance policymaking. His hypothesis, that non-incremental change occurs where ambiguity of preferences, fluid participation and unclear technology exist, is partly supported. In a comparative study in which both Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework and five singl
