作者: 案發(fā)地點 時間: 2025-3-21 22:35 作者: Subdue 時間: 2025-3-22 03:20
Ermanno C. Tortia,Silvia SacchettiP1 — AP6 are analytically true for states of affairs (“tPt′” being synonymous with “t is analytically implied by t′”). Consequently, we have in particular the analytical truth of “QC(.) iff ..[O(.) or O(.(.))].”作者: follicular-unit 時間: 2025-3-22 07:28 作者: 歌曲 時間: 2025-3-22 09:00 作者: 多節(jié) 時間: 2025-3-22 15:20
Introductionselected terms. Every science aims at choosing such terms as can be brought into a definitional system. But most of all its selection of terms is determined by the scientific interests and the field of reference which are . for it.作者: 修飾語 時間: 2025-3-22 21:03
The Central Axioms for the Part-Concept “P”nstead of “((A and B) and C)” and “(A and (B and C)),” and “(A or B or C)” instead of “((A or B) or C)” and “(A or (B or C)).” Also, we write “t=t′” and “tPt”“ instead of “(t=t′)” and “(tPt′),” except in case these expressions form the scope of a quantifier or of a term-forming operator. Instead of “not t=t”“ we write “t≠t.”作者: Foolproof 時間: 2025-3-23 01:02 作者: 避開 時間: 2025-3-23 04:56 作者: 蟄伏 時間: 2025-3-23 09:29 作者: nullify 時間: 2025-3-23 12:58 作者: 尖 時間: 2025-3-23 17:48
Possibility and Necessity state of affairs is analytically possible, precisely if it does not analytically imply a contradiction. According to the younger definition, which was advanced by Leibniz, a state of affairs is analytically possible, precisely if it obtains in some possible world.作者: AGATE 時間: 2025-3-23 19:16 作者: Mingle 時間: 2025-3-24 00:05 作者: amphibian 時間: 2025-3-24 06:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85722-4on against this definition that it is too narrow; for one would certainly like to call some entities “states of affairs” which are not the intensions of statements (not the intensions of meaningful declarative sentences), although they could be. Moreover, it may be that the definition is also too wi作者: 喃喃而言 時間: 2025-3-24 06:44
Freedom of Will: A History of Theories,t .. In the philosophical tradition there are, however, two definitions of the concept of analytical possibility. According to the older definition, a state of affairs is analytically possible, precisely if it does not analytically imply a contradiction. According to the younger definition, which wa作者: 接觸 時間: 2025-3-24 14:02
Sonja Novkovi?,Karen Miner,Cian McMahonor if it were, then . state of affairs would be an obtaining state of affairs, according to DP31, since the contradictory state of affairs is ., the . state of affairs, of which all states of affairs are (intensional) parts. There is, however, no doubt that some states of affairs do not obtain.作者: LAP 時間: 2025-3-24 17:23
Ermanno C. Tortia,Silvia Sacchettio DP31, to “..[O(.) or O(.(.))],” and this, in turn, according to DP32 and DP33, equivalent to “..(V(.) or F(.))” — “every state of affairs is true or false.” All the mentioned equivalences hold true analytically with respect to states of affairs on the basis of the posited definitions, given that A作者: 新字 時間: 2025-3-24 22:24 作者: 浮夸 時間: 2025-3-24 23:39 作者: UNT 時間: 2025-3-25 04:49 作者: 碎石 時間: 2025-3-25 07:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85722-4In LP we have at our disposal the definite description operator . Therefore, we can define functional terms in LP, for example:作者: 顛簸地移動 時間: 2025-3-25 12:49
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230314139The central axioms AP1 — AP3 are first of all extended by作者: ILEUM 時間: 2025-3-25 16:04
Habermas and His Communicative PerspectiveAs a further axiom we have作者: PTCA635 時間: 2025-3-25 20:46 作者: A保存的 時間: 2025-3-26 00:55
Humanistic Ethics in the Age of GlobalityNegation, conjunction and disjunction (as the defined expressions “.”, “.” and “.” are to be read, given that the universe of discourse consists precisely of all states of affairs) are Boolean functional terms; for we can prove:作者: Maximize 時間: 2025-3-26 06:20 作者: innovation 時間: 2025-3-26 08:27 作者: expository 時間: 2025-3-26 16:26 作者: multiply 時間: 2025-3-26 17:29
Cooperative Governance in ContextThe law of truth [*1] for “.,” TP98, has already been proved. The law of falsity for “.” results from TP98 by TP107:.TP108 ....(F(.(.,.)) iff F(.) or F(.)).作者: 敲詐 時間: 2025-3-26 23:11 作者: 爭議的蘋果 時間: 2025-3-27 03:54
Jeffrey Bardzell,Shaowen BardzellThe general basis for examining AP7, AP8 and AP9 with respect to their deductive relations to each other and to other statements is the system AP1 — AP6 and the accompanying definitions (under the current interpretation of LP with respect to the universe of states of affairs).作者: 公共汽車 時間: 2025-3-27 08:58 作者: Exaggerate 時間: 2025-3-27 11:21
Functional Terms Definable by “P”In LP we have at our disposal the definite description operator . Therefore, we can define functional terms in LP, for example:作者: 殘廢的火焰 時間: 2025-3-27 14:40 作者: Detain 時間: 2025-3-27 19:23 作者: PSA-velocity 時間: 2025-3-27 23:30 作者: 文件夾 時間: 2025-3-28 03:52 作者: Resistance 時間: 2025-3-28 10:01 作者: kidney 時間: 2025-3-28 12:32
Possible Worlds and Elementary States of AffairsAnalogues of the concepts defined by the following three definitions are highly important in logical semantics for the description of certain central deductive characteristics of sets of formulae. The corresponding ontological concepts are not less important in the ontology of states of affairs.作者: Cupidity 時間: 2025-3-28 17:10 作者: 造反,叛亂 時間: 2025-3-28 22:43 作者: restrain 時間: 2025-3-29 01:15
ContingencyAP7 and AP8 do not exclude (on the basis of AP1 — AP6) “..” Nevertheless, the world is not the minimal state of affairs. Otherwise there would be only one obtaining state of affairs: the minimal state of affairs.作者: 裙帶關(guān)系 時間: 2025-3-29 03:46
A Further Examination of Axioms AP7 — AP9The general basis for examining AP7, AP8 and AP9 with respect to their deductive relations to each other and to other statements is the system AP1 — AP6 and the accompanying definitions (under the current interpretation of LP with respect to the universe of states of affairs).作者: lactic 時間: 2025-3-29 09:27 作者: 蟄伏 時間: 2025-3-29 12:13 作者: coagulation 時間: 2025-3-29 18:42 作者: glucagon 時間: 2025-3-29 20:33 作者: chandel 時間: 2025-3-30 01:48
Axiomatic Formal Ontology978-94-015-8867-6Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292 作者: BOLT 時間: 2025-3-30 05:08
Sonja Novkovi?,Karen Miner,Cian McMahonor if it were, then . state of affairs would be an obtaining state of affairs, according to DP31, since the contradictory state of affairs is ., the . state of affairs, of which all states of affairs are (intensional) parts. There is, however, no doubt that some states of affairs do not obtain.作者: 記憶 時間: 2025-3-30 10:34
Introductionhe totality of facts pertaining to the corresponding field of reference; the point of view can be identified with the set of scientific interests, by which the science is guided. There are scientific interests which are shared by all sciences, others which are restricted to specific sciences. Every 作者: 宇宙你 時間: 2025-3-30 15:36
The Central Axioms for the Part-Concept “P”er predicate logic with identity and definite descriptions (classical first-order logic being presupposed) is extended by the dyadic predicate “P” to form the language LP, such that for all names, variables and functional terms (all singular terms) t and t′ of LP, “(tPt′)” is a sentence-form of LP (作者: expire 時間: 2025-3-30 18:19
The Concept of State of Affairson against this definition that it is too narrow; for one would certainly like to call some entities “states of affairs” which are not the intensions of statements (not the intensions of meaningful declarative sentences), although they could be. Moreover, it may be that the definition is also too wi作者: 隨意 時間: 2025-3-30 20:57
Possibility and Necessityt .. In the philosophical tradition there are, however, two definitions of the concept of analytical possibility. According to the older definition, a state of affairs is analytically possible, precisely if it does not analytically imply a contradiction. According to the younger definition, which wa作者: syring 時間: 2025-3-31 01:14
The Law of Non-Contradictionor if it were, then . state of affairs would be an obtaining state of affairs, according to DP31, since the contradictory state of affairs is ., the . state of affairs, of which all states of affairs are (intensional) parts. There is, however, no doubt that some states of affairs do not obtain.作者: syncope 時間: 2025-3-31 08:48
The Law of Excluded Middleo DP31, to “..[O(.) or O(.(.))],” and this, in turn, according to DP32 and DP33, equivalent to “..(V(.) or F(.))” — “every state of affairs is true or false.” All the mentioned equivalences hold true analytically with respect to states of affairs on the basis of the posited definitions, given that A作者: Vsd168 時間: 2025-3-31 10:04 作者: 漂亮才會豪華 時間: 2025-3-31 15:21
Tyler Perry and the (Mis)Representation of Religious Moralityosexual icon of Christian virtue is not an exclusively black phenomenon, but does carry a particular signification of meaning within the context of black religious experience. That the good Christian girl is a . is not meant to suggest immaturity. Rather, it indicates an innocence, especially in ter作者: 同步信息 時間: 2025-3-31 17:44 作者: MOTIF 時間: 2025-4-1 00:40 作者: cravat 時間: 2025-4-1 02:55
