標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology; William O‘Donohue,Akihiko Masuda,Scott Lilienfeld Textbook 2022 Springer N [打印本頁] 作者: 強烈興趣 時間: 2025-3-21 18:46
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology被引頻次
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology年度引用
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology讀者反饋
書目名稱Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 現(xiàn)代 時間: 2025-3-21 23:16 作者: OREX 時間: 2025-3-22 02:26 作者: MARS 時間: 2025-3-22 05:12
History of Replication Failures in Psychology less than half of a sample of 100 studies successfully replicated. Since that time, other large-scale replication attempts have echoed the worrisome state of psychological science. Dubbed “the replication crisis,” this dilemma in the sciences is twofold; not only are replication studies rarely cond作者: LASH 時間: 2025-3-22 11:30 作者: penance 時間: 2025-3-22 12:53
Data Detective Methods for Revealing Questionable Research Practicester discusses some methods for detecting the presence of QRPs, mostly by looking for conflicts in different sources of information. These methods typically cannot identify precisely which QRPs were used, and sometimes the conflicts are due to typos or simple mistakes, but either way readers should b作者: frivolous 時間: 2025-3-22 18:14
Controversies Regarding Null Hypothesis Significance Testinghnical description of perhaps the most useful NHST alternative, Bayesian methods. We then provide illustrations of an unnecessary, tragic consequence of using NHST in a series of individual studies: The inability to incorporate previous findings when analyzing a new dataset. This is accompanied by i作者: 容易生皺紋 時間: 2025-3-23 00:25
Hypothesizing After Results Are Known: HARKingng After Results Are Known (HARKing) threatens all of these values, and therefore is a threat to science itself. A commitment to reducing the prevalence of HARKing does not mean a stifling of exploration or creativity; indeed, these are at the core of discovery. Instead, that commitment is about pre作者: Factual 時間: 2025-3-23 03:19 作者: 積云 時間: 2025-3-23 08:15 作者: Ceremony 時間: 2025-3-23 13:38
Avoiding Questionable Research Practices Surrounding Statistical Power Analysisthe conduct of psychological science, reduce questionable research practices (QRPs), and perhaps even detect QRPs. In general, the utility of power analysis in countering QRPs is narrower than commonly believed. We begin by reviewing concepts that lead to a formal definition of statistical power. We作者: abolish 時間: 2025-3-23 16:57 作者: Feckless 時間: 2025-3-23 21:24 作者: 含水層 時間: 2025-3-23 23:29 作者: 植物茂盛 時間: 2025-3-24 05:14 作者: carotid-bruit 時間: 2025-3-24 07:44
Adversarial Collaborationborate with the aim of making progress on their disputed research question. As an approach to research, adversarial collaboration sits squarely within the open science framework because it puts a premium on transparency in hypothesis specification, study design, data analysis, study interpretation a作者: 人工制品 時間: 2025-3-24 12:16
Textbook 2022as well as recommended practices for combatting these problems.?Ultimately, the book aims to provide a comprehensive, current, and accessible account of the adverse effects of QRPs..The replication crisis in psychology and allied fields has exposed critical flaws in the standard views of research me作者: Fermentation 時間: 2025-3-24 15:42
Lecture Notes in Computer Scienceful scientific narratives that really engage audiences. Rather than seeing post-hoc findings as a pox on the study or investigator, as scholars and humans we should embrace the twists and turns our scholarship takes us, realizing that doing so is both more honest and more interesting.作者: 格子架 時間: 2025-3-24 22:51
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 in relation to the file drawer effect, publication bias, and meta-analyses of SCED research. We provide recommendations for researchers and the research community to promote practices for preventing QRPs in SCED.作者: patriarch 時間: 2025-3-25 03:02 作者: 厭惡 時間: 2025-3-25 05:43 作者: 亞麻制品 時間: 2025-3-25 08:06
Hypothesizing After Results Are Known: HARKingful scientific narratives that really engage audiences. Rather than seeing post-hoc findings as a pox on the study or investigator, as scholars and humans we should embrace the twists and turns our scholarship takes us, realizing that doing so is both more honest and more interesting.作者: 白楊魚 時間: 2025-3-25 13:24
Questionable Research Practices in Single-Case Experimental Designs: Examples and Possible Solutions in relation to the file drawer effect, publication bias, and meta-analyses of SCED research. We provide recommendations for researchers and the research community to promote practices for preventing QRPs in SCED.作者: conception 時間: 2025-3-25 18:06 作者: 外來 時間: 2025-3-25 21:08
Adversarial Collaborationy other open science innovations such as open materials and data sharing or study preregistration. Therefore, this chapter will begin by familiarising readers with adversarial collaboration, outlining some of its key features, and identifying potential benefits of the approach. The chapter ends with a discussion of what the approach can offer.作者: Mets552 時間: 2025-3-26 00:49 作者: shrill 時間: 2025-3-26 05:04 作者: chisel 時間: 2025-3-26 08:39 作者: 高談闊論 時間: 2025-3-26 15:04
Controversies Regarding Null Hypothesis Significance Testingllustrations, using both generated data and real data from meta-analyses in clinical psychology, of the more coherent findings that occur when NHST is ignored and when previous findings are taken into account when assessing a phenomenon across a series of studies.作者: FER 時間: 2025-3-26 17:32 作者: coddle 時間: 2025-3-26 23:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85610-6etailed preregistration of all measures, manipulations, hypotheses, and planned analysis steps. Open science practices are surely not the solution to all challenges psychological science currently faces, but they are a pretty good and easy-to-implement solution to prevent .-hacking. Let’s do it.作者: 誰在削木頭 時間: 2025-3-27 01:23 作者: padding 時間: 2025-3-27 08:15
Flavien Lebrun,Sinan Haliyo,Gilles Baillyr and state-of-the-art methods to assess publication bias in a meta-analysis and summarizes recommendations for applying these methods. We also illustrate how these methods can be applied to two meta-analyses that are typical for clinical psychology such that psychologists can readily apply the methods in their own meta-analyses.作者: beta-cells 時間: 2025-3-27 10:40
Lecture Notes in Computer Scienceic data; (d) present quantified psychometric information; and (e) acknowledge the conditional nature of the psychometric evidence across sample characteristics, dimensions of individual differences, and assessment contexts. A case example is provided to exemplify the use of these principles in a scientific report in psychology.作者: Hemiparesis 時間: 2025-3-27 15:26
Replicability and the Psychology of Sciencethey might have biases that steer their judgments away from accuracy, they seem unable to recognize these tendencies in themselves. If you wish to be the exception to the rule, start not by denying that you are human and prone to biases and motivations, but instead by having a conscience that bravely admits this to yourself.作者: 可以任性 時間: 2025-3-27 21:45 作者: 讓步 時間: 2025-3-28 01:06
Statistical Controversies in Psychological Scienceecade. Given the tools that researchers now have to avoid the mistakes that led to the replication crisis, we expect the quality of research to improve. There will undoubtedly continue to be statistical controversy, but as new practices take hold, we may see a shift in the tone of these debates to being more civil.作者: Rustproof 時間: 2025-3-28 03:41
Publication Biasr and state-of-the-art methods to assess publication bias in a meta-analysis and summarizes recommendations for applying these methods. We also illustrate how these methods can be applied to two meta-analyses that are typical for clinical psychology such that psychologists can readily apply the methods in their own meta-analyses.作者: Infraction 時間: 2025-3-28 09:32
Presenting the Psychometric Evidence for Psychological Measures: A Proposal and Thoughts on Questionic data; (d) present quantified psychometric information; and (e) acknowledge the conditional nature of the psychometric evidence across sample characteristics, dimensions of individual differences, and assessment contexts. A case example is provided to exemplify the use of these principles in a scientific report in psychology.作者: ANIM 時間: 2025-3-28 12:16
te research transparency.A practical resource for students, This authoritative volume presents a detailed analysis of the replication crisis and the use of questionable research practices (QRPs) in psychology, as well as recommended practices for combatting these problems.?Ultimately, the book aims 作者: 細微差別 時間: 2025-3-28 18:23
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 to the issues of QRPs, setting them into a historical and current landscape in psychological science and clinical psychology. The second section of this volume (Chaps. ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., and .) introduces some of the notable exemplars of QRPs and QRPs in various research contexts. Finally, in 作者: 儲備 時間: 2025-3-28 22:39 作者: 膽大 時間: 2025-3-29 01:13 作者: GROWL 時間: 2025-3-29 06:39
Flavien Lebrun,Sinan Haliyo,Gilles Bailly the interpretation and evaluation of results. Because of inherent ontological inconsistencies, post-study applications of power are unjustified and misplaced. Finally, we briefly note that other design features play essential roles in enhancing the credibility of research results.作者: enormous 時間: 2025-3-29 08:23 作者: 狼群 時間: 2025-3-29 12:21
Questionable Research Practices in Clinical Psychology to the issues of QRPs, setting them into a historical and current landscape in psychological science and clinical psychology. The second section of this volume (Chaps. ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., and .) introduces some of the notable exemplars of QRPs and QRPs in various research contexts. Finally, in 作者: 吹牛大王 時間: 2025-3-29 17:17
History of Replication Failures in Psychologyve structures in our scientific enterprise, which we will discuss in greater detail later in the chapter. We conclude this chapter with the hopes that learning more about the historical context of the replication crisis helps readers participate in discourse on the subject and motivates them to be a作者: Macronutrients 時間: 2025-3-29 20:37
Data Detective Methods for Revealing Questionable Research Practicesmilarly easy check is the use of the STATCHECK program to identify inconsistencies between reported test statistics and .-values, which may indicate sloppiness in reporting or improper rounding to conclude statistical significance. Similar problems can also be discovered with the GRIM test, which id作者: Hangar 時間: 2025-3-30 03:13
Avoiding Questionable Research Practices Surrounding Statistical Power Analysis the interpretation and evaluation of results. Because of inherent ontological inconsistencies, post-study applications of power are unjustified and misplaced. Finally, we briefly note that other design features play essential roles in enhancing the credibility of research results.作者: 黃瓜 時間: 2025-3-30 05:44 作者: 間接 時間: 2025-3-30 11:55 作者: 軍械庫 時間: 2025-3-30 13:12 作者: Postulate 時間: 2025-3-30 16:37
Textbook 2022 their negative impact through open data practices, preregistration of hypotheses and analyses, and adversarial collaborations, in which investigators holding opposing positions on a scientific issue agree to work together on a study in an effort to counteract their respective biases.?.Among the top作者: GEM 時間: 2025-3-31 00:33 作者: GOUGE 時間: 2025-3-31 02:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2replication crisis; replicability in psychology; best practices in psychology; research methods; questio作者: Anhydrous 時間: 2025-3-31 07:02
978-3-031-04970-5Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022作者: 不斷的變動 時間: 2025-3-31 09:21 作者: 現(xiàn)暈光 時間: 2025-3-31 16:04 作者: textile 時間: 2025-3-31 18:40 作者: 手術(shù)刀 時間: 2025-4-1 00:30 作者: 膽小鬼 時間: 2025-4-1 04:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85623-6pen Science, such gains could be short-lived if findings are not also accurate—replicable, with correct interpretations and conclusions. Accepting that we ourselves are humans who are vulnerable to unconscious motivations that influence the ways we conduct science and the conclusions we come to shou作者: 演繹 時間: 2025-4-1 06:01 作者: libertine 時間: 2025-4-1 11:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85610-6 become clear that .-hacking can have detrimental consequences—particularly an increase in false-positive rates—that ultimately damage the trustworthiness and robustness of psychological science. What can any researchers do to confirm that they did not engage in questionable research practices? The
