標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights; A Case of Institutio Russell Solomon Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th [打印本頁] 作者: autoantibodies 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:38
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights被引頻次
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights年度引用
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights讀者反饋
書目名稱Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 天真 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:42
Book 2021liance with international rights standards, its translation of these standards into domestic law and policy has been found wanting. In considering Australia’s compliance across the policy areas of health, housing, labour and social security, it is argued that Australia’s failings can be understood i作者: asthma 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:04 作者: BURSA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:07 作者: 有常識 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:56 作者: Abnormal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:05
Javier Aragoneses,Carmen Mínguezerty reduction policy focus with the individual rather than society taking the risk. A ‘workfare’ focus and some privatisation of the social security system have resulted in accessibility to social security support being highly constrained even if formally available.作者: dithiolethione 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:23
Javier Aragoneses,Carmen Mínguezting majority interests and neglecting growing inequality. The path to ESR realisation will require both institutional renovation and a process of inculcating these international norms into the dominant political culture.作者: 上流社會 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:06 作者: Neutropenia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:23 作者: Eclampsia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:33
The Right to Work and Rights at Work in Australia,ake action in support of their rights. The framework further undermines rights at work through the maintenance and promotion of various forms of precarious employment while some sectors of the population continue to be denied even the right to work.作者: 有權(quán)威 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:45
The Right to Social Security in Australia,erty reduction policy focus with the individual rather than society taking the risk. A ‘workfare’ focus and some privatisation of the social security system have resulted in accessibility to social security support being highly constrained even if formally available.作者: lavish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:55 作者: 骯臟 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33166-4ements of primary healthcare all placing pressure on public health provision and negatively impacting the affordability, accessibility and acceptability of healthcare, particularly for vulnerable groups.作者: 透明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:42 作者: maverick 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:15
od in terms of its institutional framework.States that the i.This book is a contemporary socio-legal study of Australia’s protection of economic and social rights. Despite Australia’s hortatory language of compliance with international rights standards, its translation of these standards into domest作者: 安撫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:12 作者: 原來 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:36 作者: Neolithic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0033-3Domestic translation of international economic and social rights; Legislating for rights in Australia作者: exhibit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:33 作者: 流眼淚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:04 作者: adduction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33166-4 Australia’s healthcare policy against the international benchmark principles of availability, accessibility and acceptability and finds its institutional framework acts to inhibit the protection and promotion of this right. Without constitutional protection, a federal bill of rights or the judicial作者: 一夫一妻制 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:12 作者: Mawkish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:20
Javier Aragoneses,Carmen Mínguezfrom those standards. The?institutional framework?that shapes the labour regulatory regime,?while providing no?constitutional or statutory protection for these rights yet?influenced by neoliberal ideas, is critical to explaining Australia’s mediocre engagement with these rights. The ., the national 作者: 現(xiàn)任者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:13 作者: 戰(zhàn)勝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:41 作者: MITE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:17
n for rights and leaves that protection almost exclusively in the realm of politics and policymaking, an arena still dominated by neoliberalism and a political culture averse to the protection and promotion of economic and social rights. .978-981-16-0035-7978-981-16-0033-3作者: 受辱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:35
Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social RightsA Case of Institutio作者: ENNUI 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:46 作者: 脆弱吧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:11 作者: 子女 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:59 作者: Intrepid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:53 作者: temperate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:15 作者: 吞下 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:57
The Right to Social Security in Australia,oach referencing its obligations at international law. The country’s institutional framework gives no constitutional protection, no bill of rights and no right to social security at common law with social security decisions made solely within the political and policy space. The country’s majoritaria作者: babble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:42
,Concluding Reflections on Australia’s Engagement with Economic and Social Rights,ssess Australia’s realisation of rights in each policy area. In the case of each right, Australia has failed to move from the . giving international rhetorical support for rights to the . . so as to?comply with these standards. These failings are explained by an institutional framework that leaves r作者: chronicle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:03
10樓作者: covert 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:05
10樓
