標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Art Matters; A Critical Commentar K. Harries Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.Martin Heide [打印本頁] 作者: tricuspid-valve 時間: 2025-3-21 17:16
書目名稱Art Matters影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Art Matters影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Art Matters網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Art Matters網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Art Matters被引頻次
書目名稱Art Matters被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Art Matters年度引用
書目名稱Art Matters年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Art Matters讀者反饋
書目名稱Art Matters讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: dissent 時間: 2025-3-21 22:52 作者: Emasculate 時間: 2025-3-22 03:51
A Pair of Shoes, thing + artistic addendum, however that is to be understood. With reference to Kant, I pointed out that such insistence on the thingly character of the work of art is not at all as unproblematic as Heidegger here seems to take it. Heidegger’s turn to the thing demands thoughtful questioning.作者: 缺乏 時間: 2025-3-22 05:11 作者: 無能力之人 時間: 2025-3-22 09:21
Truth and Art, the thing to the human intellect? This becomes what Heidegger calls the truth of beings and identifies with the “opening up of the Being of beings”. That “opening up of the Being of beings” presents itself to us as Heidegger’s recasting of the Latin .. To be sure, adaequatio is hardly the right word for what Heidegger has in mind.作者: 誤傳 時間: 2025-3-22 16:13 作者: 壯觀的游行 時間: 2025-3-22 17:24 作者: BOAST 時間: 2025-3-23 01:04
Externe und interne Fixateursysteme incompleteness by linking it to a certain one-sidedness of Heidegger’s analysis of authenticity. Instead of “one-sidedness” I could also have spoken of the all too formal character of Heidegger’s analysis of authenticity.作者: 中止 時間: 2025-3-23 05:01 作者: Canyon 時間: 2025-3-23 07:12 作者: Adornment 時間: 2025-3-23 12:33
Work andWorld,gh’s painting. This does not mean that something is correctly portrayed, but rather that in the revelation of the equipmental being of the shoes, that which is as a whole, world and earth, in their counterplay–attains to unconcealedness.”作者: 纖細(xì) 時間: 2025-3-23 15:27
Book 2009ts, the essay challenges such talk, just as it in turn is challenged by such talk, talk that is supported by the current state of the art-world. It was Hegel, who most profoundly argued that the shape of our modern world no longer permits us to grant art the significance it once possessed. Hegel’s p作者: HAIRY 時間: 2025-3-23 22:02 作者: 放棄 時間: 2025-3-23 22:19
In Search of a Hero,hallenging Plato, Heidegger would like to call the poets back into the Republic; challenging Hegel, he would like to count art once more “as the highest manner in which truth obtains existence for itself.” To do so, he has to challenge the understanding of truth that presides over our modern world.作者: 形上升才刺激 時間: 2025-3-24 04:41 作者: 戰(zhàn)勝 時間: 2025-3-24 08:47 作者: 后來 時間: 2025-3-24 10:54 作者: 情感 時間: 2025-3-24 14:55
Information Engineering und IV-Controllingnst it. What is at stake for Heidegger is, as we have seen, first of all not just or even primarily the future and, more especially, the significance of art, but the happening of truth and its significance. Challenging Hegel, Heidegger wants to understand art once more ..作者: commonsense 時間: 2025-3-24 19:41 作者: Resign 時間: 2025-3-25 02:59 作者: 催眠藥 時間: 2025-3-25 04:14 作者: 管理員 時間: 2025-3-25 10:46 作者: 廢止 時間: 2025-3-25 13:03 作者: 先行 時間: 2025-3-25 17:53 作者: 拱形面包 時間: 2025-3-25 22:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3 attention to the remarkable way in which the structure of a simple proposition mirrors our understanding of the thing as a substance with attributes; and he had raised the question: “Is the structure of a simple propositional statement (the combination of subject and predicate) the mirror image of 作者: 消極詞匯 時間: 2025-3-26 01:10
Information Engineering und IV-Controllingthought and reflection have overtaken the fine arts: we who are truly of today no longer can take seriously art’s claim to serve the truth. Challenging Hegel, Heidegger insists on a more intimate connection between truth and art, insists on that connection, even as he recognizes all that argues agai作者: ELUDE 時間: 2025-3-26 06:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3all?” A first answer is suggested by the preceding discussion. How are we to understand the truth of things, when we are no longer able to appeal to an allseeing God, when instead we follow Nietzsche and proclaim the death of God? Does the truth of things then not have to become ., the adequation of作者: Nucleate 時間: 2025-3-26 08:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3aces this being in the Open in such a way that what is to be brought forth first clears the openness of the Open into which it comes forth. Where this bringing forth expressly brings the openness of beings, or truth, that which is brought forth is a work. Creation is such a bringing forth. As such a作者: 狗窩 時間: 2025-3-26 15:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3essay draws to a close Heidegger becomes more specific and, notwithstanding the earlier emphasis on the Greek temple, insists that it depends especially on poetry, which is now given a certain primacy.作者: oblique 時間: 2025-3-26 16:54 作者: 靈敏 時間: 2025-3-26 21:50 作者: Blanch 時間: 2025-3-27 01:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3essay draws to a close Heidegger becomes more specific and, notwithstanding the earlier emphasis on the Greek temple, insists that it depends especially on poetry, which is now given a certain primacy.作者: 遺棄 時間: 2025-3-27 08:24
Zusammenfassende Ergebnisdarstellung,tanding of Being that has presided over the progress of metaphysics, an understanding that would make our ability to comprehend reality the measure of being, Heidegger wants to recall us to the wonder that seizes us whenever we suddenly experience some quite ordinary thing, say a pebble on some beach, as a finally incomprehensible gift.作者: 哺乳動物 時間: 2025-3-27 12:35 作者: ENACT 時間: 2025-3-27 13:40
R. Baumgart,A. Betz,L. SchweibererHeidegger concludes “The Origin of the Work of Art” with the question whether art can be an origin (.) and then must be a head start (.), or whether it is to remain a mere appendix and then can only be carried along (.) as a routine cultural phenomenon.作者: landmark 時間: 2025-3-27 18:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9636-3“The origin of something,” Heidegger tells us, “is the source of its nature.” How then do we begin our inquiry into the origin of the work of art? The obvious answer: by looking at works of art. And do we not all have some understanding of where to look?作者: incite 時間: 2025-3-28 00:38 作者: 殘廢的火焰 時間: 2025-3-28 02:40 作者: CHIDE 時間: 2025-3-28 07:10 作者: 螢火蟲 時間: 2025-3-28 11:27
Art Is Poetry,essay draws to a close Heidegger becomes more specific and, notwithstanding the earlier emphasis on the Greek temple, insists that it depends especially on poetry, which is now given a certain primacy.作者: PALMY 時間: 2025-3-28 16:01
Conclusion: Epilogue and Addendum,tanding of Being that has presided over the progress of metaphysics, an understanding that would make our ability to comprehend reality the measure of being, Heidegger wants to recall us to the wonder that seizes us whenever we suddenly experience some quite ordinary thing, say a pebble on some beach, as a finally incomprehensible gift.作者: Dealing 時間: 2025-3-28 18:58 作者: decode 時間: 2025-3-29 01:33 作者: Glucocorticoids 時間: 2025-3-29 04:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9989-2Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel; Martin Heidegger; art-world; politics; truth作者: 表狀態(tài) 時間: 2025-3-29 09:03 作者: 不能仁慈 時間: 2025-3-29 12:51 作者: Duodenitis 時間: 2025-3-29 16:11
Leaders and Followers, may be considered an incompleteness in the understanding of authenticity developed in Being and Time. The second chapter addressed the nature of that incompleteness by linking it to a certain one-sidedness of Heidegger’s analysis of authenticity. Instead of “one-sidedness” I could also have spoken 作者: Metastasis 時間: 2025-3-29 22:07 作者: 盡忠 時間: 2025-3-30 01:55
Work andWorld,say? Heidegger, it would seem, would have us understand both as examples of truth put into work. He says so quite explicitly: “Truth happens in Van Gogh’s painting. This does not mean that something is correctly portrayed, but rather that in the revelation of the equipmental being of the shoes, that作者: 抵制 時間: 2025-3-30 04:52
World and Earth, attention to the remarkable way in which the structure of a simple proposition mirrors our understanding of the thing as a substance with attributes; and he had raised the question: “Is the structure of a simple propositional statement (the combination of subject and predicate) the mirror image of 作者: Lacerate 時間: 2025-3-30 11:50
The Essence of Truth,thought and reflection have overtaken the fine arts: we who are truly of today no longer can take seriously art’s claim to serve the truth. Challenging Hegel, Heidegger insists on a more intimate connection between truth and art, insists on that connection, even as he recognizes all that argues agai作者: SAGE 時間: 2025-3-30 13:55
Truth and Art,all?” A first answer is suggested by the preceding discussion. How are we to understand the truth of things, when we are no longer able to appeal to an allseeing God, when instead we follow Nietzsche and proclaim the death of God? Does the truth of things then not have to become ., the adequation of作者: gustation 時間: 2025-3-30 20:11
Creators and Preservers,aces this being in the Open in such a way that what is to be brought forth first clears the openness of the Open into which it comes forth. Where this bringing forth expressly brings the openness of beings, or truth, that which is brought forth is a work. Creation is such a bringing forth. As such a作者: osculate 時間: 2025-3-31 00:28 作者: 補充 時間: 2025-3-31 04:13
