標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy; George R. Feiwel (Alumni Distinguished Service Pro Book 1987 George R. Feiwel [打印本頁] 作者: incontestable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:59
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy被引頻次
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy年度引用
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy讀者反饋
書目名稱Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: inveigh 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:38 作者: 拋射物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:07
Ordinal Utilitarianism part of his work to date that most strikes a moral philosopher is his critique of utilitarianism. The critique brought to moral theory the full force of the ‘ordinalist revolution’ in economics. Classical utilitarians assessed policies by their contribution to the general happiness — to the sum of 作者: fastness 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:53
Sparks from Arrow’s Anvilts and philosophers left bereft by the Impossibility Theorem (according to which . social-choice function exists that satisfies a set of reasonable axioms of consistency, transitivity, independence or irrelevant alternatives, and …). Specifically, he made reference to the pre-Rawls suggestions of Wi作者: 種族被根除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:34
Maximizing Freedom of Decision: an Axiomatic Analysise on maximizing subsequent freedom of choice rather than current expected utility. It may be argued against this view that a sufficiently rich decision framework will take account of the utility of such second-order effects as future freedom of decision, properly discounted, of course. But I am deep作者: machination 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:44 作者: 開始發(fā)作 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:14 作者: 愛花花兒憤怒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:18 作者: entreat 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:05
Income Distribution and Differences in Needsy of this subject. There are those who regard differences in needs as sufficient grounds for rejecting any analysis of income inequality. For them to try to compare one distribution of income, .,…, . with another, .*,…, .*, is without meaning, since the people concerned may have quite different need作者: 摘要記錄 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:13 作者: 美食家 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:26
Peak Pricing, Congestion, and Fairnessthe fact that the associated congestion causes disutility, through delays, crowding, etc. Second, we investigate formally the . of the peak-pricing solution,. comparing it with uniformity of pricing in all periods — an issue that has disturbed observers outside our profession, but that economists ha作者: Myofibrils 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:29 作者: 拖網(wǎng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6523-3 by his personality (his mind, spirit, humanity, conscience, and enthusiasm), this chapter hardly needs justification. Great scholars are not always admirable individuals. This is not true of Arrow. To the extent that I succeeded (as always, with the exemplary and devoted assistance of my ‘permanent作者: vibrant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:37 作者: Occupation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4 part of his work to date that most strikes a moral philosopher is his critique of utilitarianism. The critique brought to moral theory the full force of the ‘ordinalist revolution’ in economics. Classical utilitarians assessed policies by their contribution to the general happiness — to the sum of 作者: 奇思怪想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:19 作者: adroit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4e on maximizing subsequent freedom of choice rather than current expected utility. It may be argued against this view that a sufficiently rich decision framework will take account of the utility of such second-order effects as future freedom of decision, properly discounted, of course. But I am deep作者: notification 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4ial actions’ (Arrow 1967, p. 12). Numerous problems, different from each other in many important respects, fit into this general characterization. The voluminous literature on the preference aggregation problems has extensively utilized the uniform and abstract framework of the axiomatic social choi作者: 睨視 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:57 作者: FID 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4m (Arrow and Debreu 1954) and the decentrali-zability of a Pareto optimum (Arrow 1951). In this chapter, we are concerned with general equilibrium in a setting where some goods are indivisible. Hence, several hypotheses that are standard in equilibrium analysis are not satisfied. None the less, as w作者: Narcissist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:07 作者: 窒息 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:47 作者: 幼稚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4the fact that the associated congestion causes disutility, through delays, crowding, etc. Second, we investigate formally the . of the peak-pricing solution,. comparing it with uniformity of pricing in all periods — an issue that has disturbed observers outside our profession, but that economists ha作者: Breach 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4n individual welfare functions (Arrow 1951, p. 5). In contrast with Arrow’s pathbreaking theoretical work, this chapter will deal with some attempts to empirically specify individual welfare functions. These attempts are close to Levy and Guttman (1975) (which mentions Guttman’s previous work (1971)作者: expository 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:16 作者: 責(zé)任 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:05 作者: 自制 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4The last paragraph of Kenneth Arrow’s Nobel Lecture is characteristic of the man:作者: 抱負(fù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:18 作者: medium 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4In this chapter, I propose to revisit the concept and the analysis of the ., a subject with which numerous authors have dealt, and to which I devoted twelve papers between 1958 and 1981.1 I feel I owe the reader some explanation why this thirteenth paper was written.作者: Foam-Cells 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4It is easy to contribute a chapter to a volume honouring Kenneth Arrow: there is hardly an area of concern to modern economic theory where he has not had fundamental insights. This chapter picks up on two themes on which he made early and important contributions.作者: Ruptured-Disk 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:43
On Reconciling Arrow’s Theory of Social Choice with Harsanyi’s Fundamental UtilitarianismThe last paragraph of Kenneth Arrow’s Nobel Lecture is characteristic of the man:作者: 圓錐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:00 作者: Optic-Disk 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:13 作者: 的事物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:00 作者: Gourmet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:40 作者: 新陳代謝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:02
When is a Fixed Income Distribution Optimal?s though the relevant information could be summarized by a ‘sufficient statistic’, namely the country’s income distribution. From this one obtains the mean (per capita) income and the curve of concentration, or ‘Lorenz curve’, making possible comparisons of different economies with the same per capita income.作者: Minikin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:36 作者: Legend 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:00
Overview: 978-1-349-07359-7978-1-349-07357-3作者: 可卡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:37 作者: 條約 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:43 作者: 縮減了 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4Talk of economic agents’ ‘utility’ was reinterpreted as talk of preference orderings. Arrow followed Pareto and Bergson in bringing this change to welfare economics, beginning with his famous Impossibility Theorem. Very little of utilitarianism, the theorem showed, could survive a searching ordinalistic critique.作者: PAEAN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:20
Ordinal UtilitarianismTalk of economic agents’ ‘utility’ was reinterpreted as talk of preference orderings. Arrow followed Pareto and Bergson in bringing this change to welfare economics, beginning with his famous Impossibility Theorem. Very little of utilitarianism, the theorem showed, could survive a searching ordinalistic critique.作者: DEMN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6523-3sion was not only tempered by good advice from friendly critics, but it is also modified by the images of Arrow that can be found throughout both volumes and particularly by those so vividly sketched in the chapters in Part V of this volume.作者: 尋找 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4ut $4,000 worth per annum of coagulant therapy to arrive at a state of security from bleeding at all comparable to that of the normal person’, an example he contrasts with the ‘facetious’ one of a person who is ‘desperate without pre-phylloxera clarets and plovers’ eggs’ (1973, p. 254).作者: Trigger-Point 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:41 作者: relieve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:37
Income Distribution and Differences in Needsut $4,000 worth per annum of coagulant therapy to arrive at a state of security from bleeding at all comparable to that of the normal person’, an example he contrasts with the ‘facetious’ one of a person who is ‘desperate without pre-phylloxera clarets and plovers’ eggs’ (1973, p. 254).作者: Forage飼料 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:26 作者: browbeat 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4 voluminous literature on the preference aggregation problems has extensively utilized the uniform and abstract framework of the axiomatic social choice theory (basically due to Arrow’s (1951) seminal work) for analysing these essentially different problems.作者: 易改變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:32 作者: 偽書 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:33 作者: 大方一點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 09:32 作者: left-ventricle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 13:00
Sparks from Arrow’s Anvilioms of consistency, transitivity, independence or irrelevant alternatives, and …). Specifically, he made reference to the pre-Rawls suggestions of William Vickrey (1945) and of John C. Harsanyi (1955) as providing related derivations of . interpersonal utilities by reliance on certain elements of extended sympathy.作者: 諷刺滑稽戲劇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 20:03
Arrow and the Problem of Social Choice voluminous literature on the preference aggregation problems has extensively utilized the uniform and abstract framework of the axiomatic social choice theory (basically due to Arrow’s (1951) seminal work) for analysing these essentially different problems.作者: nocturia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 22:50
On the Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goodsa setting where some goods are indivisible. Hence, several hypotheses that are standard in equilibrium analysis are not satisfied. None the less, as we will see, the classic Arrow-Debreu techniques can be suitably modified to overcome this difficulty.作者: agitate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 01:28
Peak Pricing, Congestion, and Fairnesslution,. comparing it with uniformity of pricing in all periods — an issue that has disturbed observers outside our profession, but that economists have often ignored. We offer a number of surprising conclusions:作者: 最初 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 08:05
The Tension Theory of Welfareo empirically specify individual welfare functions. These attempts are close to Levy and Guttman (1975) (which mentions Guttman’s previous work (1971)), and to van Praag (1971), which was followed by an impressive quantity of further empirical work by himself and his pupils.作者: 大罵 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 09:27
Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy作者: 易于 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 17:14 作者: 橢圓 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 21:14 作者: 四目在模仿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 23:44
Social Choice: the Science of the Impossible?s moving toward anyway. Other workers in these fields have benefited enormously from the vast strides made by Arrow’s work, but they would probably have done similar things, perhaps considerably more slowly, even in his absence.作者: Conjuction 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 03:17
Maximizing Freedom of Decision: an Axiomatic Analysise have do not support any grand thesis about maximizing behaviour. The studies too are about local and fragmentary decisions: buying certain goods, betting on horses, buying lottery tickets, choosing a medical treatment, etc.作者: Cosmopolitan 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 08:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38179-4s moving toward anyway. Other workers in these fields have benefited enormously from the vast strides made by Arrow’s work, but they would probably have done similar things, perhaps considerably more slowly, even in his absence.
