標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics; Ofer Arieli,Anna Zamansky Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 吸收 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:12
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics被引頻次
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics年度引用
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics讀者反饋
書目名稱Arnon Avron on Semantics and Proof Theory of Non-Classical Logics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: abduction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:29
2211-2758 oneering work is celebrated in this special book.Presents ad.This book is a collection of contributions honouring Arnon Avron’s seminal work on the semantics and proof theory of non-classical logics. It includes presentations of advanced work by some of the most esteemed scholars working on semantic作者: epidermis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:50 作者: Indelible 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:16 作者: 鬧劇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:40
Mehdi Snene,Jolita Ralyté,Jean-Henry Morints to admit a theorem of alternatives. It is also shown that a theorem of alternatives for a logic can be used to establish (uniform) deductive interpolation and completeness with respect to a class of dense totally ordered residuated lattices.作者: FECK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:20 作者: Crepitus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:26 作者: 造反,叛亂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:41
Isabelle Mirbel,Pierre Crescenzoion ., an appropriate fault-tolerance property of any logic of .-valued observables. The directional derivability of the functions coded by all . and by . then provides a quantitative formulation of our refinement of Bolzano-Tarski consequence, which turns out to coincide with the time-honored syntactic ?-consequence.作者: maudtin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:22
Theorems of Alternatives for Substructural Logics,ts to admit a theorem of alternatives. It is also shown that a theorem of alternatives for a logic can be used to establish (uniform) deductive interpolation and completeness with respect to a class of dense totally ordered residuated lattices.作者: ALLAY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:39 作者: 舊石器 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:39 作者: 入伍儀式 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:32
Consequence Relations with Real Truth Values,ion ., an appropriate fault-tolerance property of any logic of .-valued observables. The directional derivability of the functions coded by all . and by . then provides a quantitative formulation of our refinement of Bolzano-Tarski consequence, which turns out to coincide with the time-honored syntactic ?-consequence.作者: 緯度 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:31
Elena Fleac?,Bogdan Fleac?,Sanda Maiducary connective ., (. a wff) together with some other axioms for some additional connectives, how can we tell whether . is indeed a form of negation of .? Are there some axioms which the connective “.” must satisfy in order to qualify . as a negation?作者: 膽汁 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:24 作者: Hippocampus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:58
Credal Calculi, Evidence, and Consistency,possibility and necessity functions over the Logics of Formal Inconsistency are obtained and it is shown, by revisiting a paradigmatic example, how paraconsistent possibility and necessity reasoning can, in general, attain realistic models for artificial judgement. We will call such models ., emphasizing some of their appealing consequences.作者: FISC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:55
,Degree-Preserving G?del Logics with an Involution: Intermediate Logics and (Ideal) Paraconsistency,onsistency, and we fully characterize the ideal and the saturated paraconsistent logics between . and CPL. We also identify a large family of saturated paraconsistent logics in the family of intermediate logics for degree-preserving finite-valued ?ukasiewicz logics.作者: achlorhydria 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:23 作者: 單調(diào)女 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:49
Geometric Rules in Infinitary Logic,finitary generalizations as extensions of sequent calculi for both classical and intuitionistic infinitary logic. As an application, a simple proof of the infinitary Barr’s theorem without the axioms of choice is shown.作者: DAUNT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:04 作者: 巧思 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:06
Elena Fleac?,Bogdan Fleac?,Sanda Maiduconsistency, and we fully characterize the ideal and the saturated paraconsistent logics between . and CPL. We also identify a large family of saturated paraconsistent logics in the family of intermediate logics for degree-preserving finite-valued ?ukasiewicz logics.作者: BILE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:59
Vera L. Miguéis,Henriqueta Nóvoant logic. I shall discuss the history of RM, and compare RM to Anderson and Belnap’s system R of relevant implication and to classical two-valued logic. There is a “consumer’s guide,” evaluating these logics as “tools,” in the light of my recent work on “Humans as Rational Toolmaking Animals.”作者: saphenous-vein 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14980-6finitary generalizations as extensions of sequent calculi for both classical and intuitionistic infinitary logic. As an application, a simple proof of the infinitary Barr’s theorem without the axioms of choice is shown.作者: 要素 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:22 作者: Cytology 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:47
978-3-030-71260-0The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: perimenopause 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:47 作者: Corral 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:21 作者: 桶去微染 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:45 作者: 變異 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:32 作者: Obliterate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:00 作者: organism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:32
,Introduction: Non-classical Logics—Between Semantics and Proof Theory (In Relation to Arnon Avron’sWe recall some of the better known approaches to non-classical logics, with an emphasis on the contributions of Arnon?Avron to the subject and in relation to the papers in this volume.作者: 嫌惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:38
Comments on the Papers,This final chapter includes some comments of mine about the papers in this volume and their connections with my work. I am very grateful to all the authors of these papers for their nice contributions!作者: homocysteine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:00 作者: FIR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:37
Jo?o Reis,Paula Espírito Santo,Nuno Mel?osely related to linear logic. We use insights from the relational semantics of relevance logics together with a new version of the . in our semantics for logics with disjunction (but no conjunction). The ideal-based semantics, which takes co-theories to be situations, . the theory-based semantics for logics with conjunction (but no disjunction).作者: Restenosis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:29 作者: 必死 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:04 作者: 基因組 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:32 作者: noxious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:11
Mehdi Snene,Jolita Ralyté,Jean-Henry Morinde a theorem of Arnon Avron that reduces the validity of a disjunction of multiplicative formulas in the “R-mingle” logic . to the validity of a linear combination of these formulas, and Gordan’s theorem for solutions of linear systems over the real numbers that yields an analogous reduction for val作者: 歡樂東方 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:24 作者: Synapse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:10 作者: 合乎習(xí)俗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:01
Elena Fleac?,Bogdan Fleac?,Sanda Maiduc the metaconsequence level. Specifically, it does not satisfy a cut rule. It has been proposed for use in work on theories of truth because it avoids some objectionable features arising from the use of classical logic. Here we are not interested in applications, but in the formal details themselves.作者: 吸引力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:23 作者: 難理解 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:47
Zhongjie Wang,Dianhui Chu,Xiaofei Xus (RDS) are each partitioned into .. Each relevance domain is a boolean algebra. I employ this semantics to act as a formal framework to represent what Nancy Cartwright calls the “dappled world”. On the dappled world hypothesis, local scientific theories each represent restricted aspects and regions作者: Anonymous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:57 作者: byline 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:56 作者: 旋轉(zhuǎn)一周 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04810-9 that strictness and connexivity of a conditional do not exclude each other. In particular, the connexive modal logics ., ., ., ., ., and . are introduced semantically by means of classes of Kripke models. The logics . and . are connexive variants of the .-based modal logics . and . with a weak and 作者: GNAT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:02 作者: cocoon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:53 作者: 吊胃口 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:36
Credal Calculi, Evidence, and Consistency,terms of the notions of . (.) and . (.). The present proposal directly generalizes the approach of Besnard and Lang (Proceedings of 10th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp. 69–76 .), whose main guidelines we borrow here. Some basic properties of 作者: 我們的面粉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:59 作者: dermatomyositis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:08
,Degree-Preserving G?del Logics with an Involution: Intermediate Logics and (Ideal) Paraconsistency, propositional logic CPL, as well as the intermediate logics of their finite-valued counterparts .. Although . and . are explosive w.r.t. G?del negation ., they are paraconsistent w.r.t. the involutive negation .. We introduce the notion of saturated paraconsistency, a weaker notion than ideal parac作者: 誘使 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:54
R-Mingle is Nice, and so is Arnon Avron, of Anderson and Belnap.” I agree. There is the famous saying: “Do not let the perfect become the enemy of the good.” I might say: “good enough.” In this spirit, I will examine the logic R-Mingle, exploring how (in the terminology of Avron) it is only a “semi-relevant logic” but still a paraconsiste作者: Alopecia-Areata 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 13:35
The Strict/Tolerant Idea and Bilattices, the metaconsequence level. Specifically, it does not satisfy a cut rule. It has been proposed for use in work on theories of truth because it avoids some objectionable features arising from the use of classical logic. Here we are not interested in applications, but in the formal details themselves.作者: 格子架 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:32
What Is Negation in a System 2020?,without negation or as a system with some form of negation. In both cases, we are supposed to know intuitively whether there is no negation in the system or whether the form of negation presented in the system is indeed as claimed. To be more specific, suppose Robinson Crusoe writes a logical system
