作者: 手勢 時間: 2025-3-21 22:06 作者: Cabg318 時間: 2025-3-22 03:51 作者: 有害 時間: 2025-3-22 07:33 作者: Chemotherapy 時間: 2025-3-22 09:35 作者: Ptsd429 時間: 2025-3-22 14:40 作者: 是比賽 時間: 2025-3-22 20:14 作者: jet-lag 時間: 2025-3-22 23:03
Hans van Haut,Heinrich Stratmannscription of all syllogisms from two premises about necessity (apodeictic premises). The focus of the next three chapters is Aristotle’s discussion of necessity in . A9–11, where he studies syllogisms in which one premise is necessary and the other is assertoric (or non-modal). These are L+X and X+L作者: 胎兒 時間: 2025-3-23 01:50 作者: 秘方藥 時間: 2025-3-23 07:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86678-4of Aristotle’s metaphysics. Before we look at that, we need to look first at what I call . where . is simply an abbreviation for ~.~, and where the principles that govern the apodeictic syllogistic still apply.作者: 切掉 時間: 2025-3-23 12:32 作者: MAIZE 時間: 2025-3-23 16:48 作者: Inelasticity 時間: 2025-3-23 20:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04829-9This chapter is concerned with mixed apodeictic syllogisms in the second and third figures. Table 7 below lists a family of the mixed LXL syllogisms that Aristotle counts as valid, as described in . A9–11.作者: choleretic 時間: 2025-3-23 23:52 作者: BILIO 時間: 2025-3-24 04:29 作者: 令人心醉 時間: 2025-3-24 10:34 作者: ALB 時間: 2025-3-24 14:30 作者: fringe 時間: 2025-3-24 17:55 作者: patella 時間: 2025-3-24 21:38 作者: 小隔間 時間: 2025-3-24 23:40 作者: 系列 時間: 2025-3-25 07:06 作者: 兒童 時間: 2025-3-25 09:43 作者: 指數(shù) 時間: 2025-3-25 12:24
First Figure X+Q (A15)This chapter considers other mixed modal syllogisms involving Q-contingency. All of the first figure X+Q syllogisms, including Barbara XQM, are listed in Table 21.作者: 征兵 時間: 2025-3-25 18:36
First Figure L+Q, Q+L (A16)In . A16 Aristotle describes first figure syllogisms in which one premise is an apodeictic L-proposition and the other premise is a proposition about Q-contingency.作者: abduction 時間: 2025-3-25 22:09
Contingency in the 2nd Figure (A17–19)When we turn to consider . A17 where Aristotle discusses Q+Qs in the second figure, we find something very different right at the start. There are not any valid second figure Q+Q syllogisms.作者: MUMP 時間: 2025-3-26 02:52
Aristotle‘s Modal Proofs978-94-007-0050-5Series ISSN 1879-8578 Series E-ISSN 2352-2585 作者: semble 時間: 2025-3-26 05:20
,Methoden der Funktionsprüfung,from non-modal premises. Aristotle discusses these in . A1–7. The assertoric syllogistic provides the foundation for the entire syllogistic system. Aristotle’s methods in the assertoric syllogistic are generally clear, easy to understand, and, as Aristotle scholarship goes, the methods here are relatively uncontroversial.作者: 按時間順序 時間: 2025-3-26 12:21 作者: FLUSH 時間: 2025-3-26 14:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-42471-1unts. Albrecht Becker argues that the modal syllogistic falls apart because Aristotle makes a crucial mistake involving two different uses of .. (Becker 1933, pp. 41 – 43) Becker notices that Aristotle’s modal syllogisms appear to require that necessity acts as a qualifier on terms.作者: 猜忌 時間: 2025-3-26 16:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25803-3that ‘Aristotle’s doctrine of substance is integral to most of his philosophical work, not, however, to his strictly formal logic – a discipline which he inaugurated.’ (Anscombe 1961, p. vi) Whether or not Anscombe is correct it certainly seems clear that Aristotle thought that there could be no . syllogizing about what could be otherwise.作者: 蝕刻術(shù) 時間: 2025-3-26 21:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86678-4of Aristotle’s metaphysics. Before we look at that, we need to look first at what I call . where . is simply an abbreviation for ~.~, and where the principles that govern the apodeictic syllogistic still apply.作者: 身體萌芽 時間: 2025-3-27 04:09 作者: 事與愿違 時間: 2025-3-27 08:15 作者: Kindle 時間: 2025-3-27 12:19
978-94-007-3467-8Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011作者: 排他 時間: 2025-3-27 16:09 作者: filial 時間: 2025-3-27 21:02 作者: PALSY 時間: 2025-3-28 01:04
A Realm of Darknessunts. Albrecht Becker argues that the modal syllogistic falls apart because Aristotle makes a crucial mistake involving two different uses of .. (Becker 1933, pp. 41 – 43) Becker notices that Aristotle’s modal syllogisms appear to require that necessity acts as a qualifier on terms.作者: PANIC 時間: 2025-3-28 06:00
Technicolour Termsthat ‘Aristotle’s doctrine of substance is integral to most of his philosophical work, not, however, to his strictly formal logic – a discipline which he inaugurated.’ (Anscombe 1961, p. vi) Whether or not Anscombe is correct it certainly seems clear that Aristotle thought that there could be no . syllogizing about what could be otherwise.作者: 小官 時間: 2025-3-28 08:07
Apodeictic Possibilityof Aristotle’s metaphysics. Before we look at that, we need to look first at what I call . where . is simply an abbreviation for ~.~, and where the principles that govern the apodeictic syllogistic still apply.作者: 捕鯨魚叉 時間: 2025-3-28 12:06 作者: 姑姑在炫耀 時間: 2025-3-28 15:44 作者: 自負(fù)的人 時間: 2025-3-28 21:43
The Assertoric Syllogistic in LPCThis way of representing Aristotle is often regarded with suspicion. It should not be, and I want to take this chapter to explain why it should not. Developing a modern LPC representation of Aristotle’s logic is straightforward, and so the reasons that are usually offered against this approach need 作者: 繁榮中國 時間: 2025-3-29 01:16
A Realm of Darknessunts. Albrecht Becker argues that the modal syllogistic falls apart because Aristotle makes a crucial mistake involving two different uses of .. (Becker 1933, pp. 41 – 43) Becker notices that Aristotle’s modal syllogisms appear to require that necessity acts as a qualifier on terms.作者: Arteriography 時間: 2025-3-29 05:13
Technicolour Termsthat ‘Aristotle’s doctrine of substance is integral to most of his philosophical work, not, however, to his strictly formal logic – a discipline which he inaugurated.’ (Anscombe 1961, p. vi) Whether or not Anscombe is correct it certainly seems clear that Aristotle thought that there could be no . s作者: 熟練 時間: 2025-3-29 11:11
Representing the Modals denoted by X, a proposition about necessity by L, and a proposition about possibility by either M or Q depending on the kind of possibility involved. Thus, Barbara LLL is Barbara with premises and conclusion all necessary propositions, Barbara LXL is Barbara with the first premise a necessary propo作者: 商談 時間: 2025-3-29 13:01 作者: semiskilled 時間: 2025-3-29 18:52
Against the Canonical Listings. are mainly A10 and A11. And I will follow Aristotle’s text closely in order to best explain the omissions I make – for there are differences between what Aristotle’s text requires and what an interpretive tradition requires. All the way through . A9–11, Aristotle gives a new and separate proof of 作者: 合唱團(tuán) 時間: 2025-3-29 19:53 作者: 勾引 時間: 2025-3-30 00:19 作者: considerable 時間: 2025-3-30 04:10 作者: Estrogen 時間: 2025-3-30 11:26
Book 2011totle’s views of science and logical demonstration. The volume is particularly valuable to researchers and students of the history of logic, Aristotle’s theory of modality, and the philosophy of logic in general.作者: Harpoon 時間: 2025-3-30 16:23 作者: JEER 時間: 2025-3-30 19:09 作者: DRAFT 時間: 2025-3-30 21:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25803-3 Thus, Barbara LLL is Barbara with premises and conclusion all necessary propositions, Barbara LXL is Barbara with the first premise a necessary proposition, the second premise assertoric, and the conclusion necessary, and so on.作者: monogamy 時間: 2025-3-31 01:16 作者: 誹謗 時間: 2025-3-31 05:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86678-4 what Aristotle’s text requires and what an interpretive tradition requires. All the way through . A9–11, Aristotle gives a new and separate proof of each modal syllogism. He does . take the mixed syllogisms as entirely trivial and obvious.作者: 輕快來事 時間: 2025-3-31 11:01 作者: CLIFF 時間: 2025-3-31 14:14 作者: 釘牢 時間: 2025-3-31 19:40 作者: Interferons 時間: 2025-4-1 01:02
0302-9743 stablelogic, term rewriting systems, termination of logicprograms,transitive closure logic, variants of resolution,and many others.978-3-540-55789-0978-3-540-47285-8Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349
