標題: Titlebook: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse; A Pragma-Dialectical Frans H. Eemeren,Peter Houtlosser,A. Francisca Sno Book 2007 Springer Science+B [打印本頁] 作者: Buren 時間: 2025-3-21 19:21
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse被引頻次
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse年度引用
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse讀者反饋
書目名稱Argumentative Indicators in Discourse讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 接觸 時間: 2025-3-21 23:25 作者: HAVOC 時間: 2025-3-22 02:52
1566-7650 a well-developed theory of argumentation.A thorough study thArgumentative Indicators: A Pragma-Dialectical Study identifies and analyses English words and expressions that are crucial for an adequate reconstruction of argumentative discourse. It provides the analyst of argumentative discussions and 作者: 使激動 時間: 2025-3-22 06:06
W. Ehrenstein,W. Müller-Limmrothevertheless, depending on the context, the use of these words is sufficient reason to consider whether a standpoint or an argumentation is being introduced. Other argumentative indicators refer to argumentative moves in a similar way.作者: 整潔 時間: 2025-3-22 12:24
The Identification of Argumentative Indicators,evertheless, depending on the context, the use of these words is sufficient reason to consider whether a standpoint or an argumentation is being introduced. Other argumentative indicators refer to argumentative moves in a similar way.作者: monochromatic 時間: 2025-3-22 15:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24667-9cators of the distribution of the burden of proof, and which words and expressions are indicators of the common starting points. In this chapter we examine indicators of the burden of proof. In chapter 5 indicators of common starting points are examined.作者: languid 時間: 2025-3-22 18:59
Partnership Dissolution Mechanisms,e opponent’s aim is to obtain concessions that include a contradiction or constitute a contradiction with the standpoint of the proponent. The proponent’s aim is to answer the opponent’s questions in a constructive way without making concessions the opponent could use to refute the proponent’s standpoint.作者: 欲望 時間: 2025-3-23 00:40
Indicators of the Distribution of the Burden of Proof,cators of the distribution of the burden of proof, and which words and expressions are indicators of the common starting points. In this chapter we examine indicators of the burden of proof. In chapter 5 indicators of common starting points are examined.作者: Fibroid 時間: 2025-3-23 02:17
Indicators of Starting Points for the Discussion,e opponent’s aim is to obtain concessions that include a contradiction or constitute a contradiction with the standpoint of the proponent. The proponent’s aim is to answer the opponent’s questions in a constructive way without making concessions the opponent could use to refute the proponent’s standpoint.作者: hysterectomy 時間: 2025-3-23 05:38 作者: forthy 時間: 2025-3-23 12:39 作者: cravat 時間: 2025-3-23 16:26
1566-7650 tive discourse and insights from argumentation theory into the resolution of differences of opinion by means of argumentation.978-90-481-7580-2978-1-4020-6244-5Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907 作者: Mammal 時間: 2025-3-23 18:20 作者: 沒有貧窮 時間: 2025-3-23 23:53 作者: SPURN 時間: 2025-3-24 04:51 作者: 芭蕾舞女演員 時間: 2025-3-24 09:53 作者: champaign 時間: 2025-3-24 14:37
Indicators of the Argumentation Structure,ist of a particular standpoint receives or expects criticism about one or more elements of his argumentation, he will have to bring forward more arguments to meet this criticism. Depending on the nature of the criticism and the manner in which the protagonist tries to defend himself against it, the argumentation will display a different structure.作者: OGLE 時間: 2025-3-24 15:43 作者: Brochure 時間: 2025-3-24 20:51
Frans H. Eemeren,Peter Houtlosser,A. Francisca SnoFirst study entirely devoted to the analysis of words and expressions that can be indicative of argumentative moves.Systematically based on a well-developed theory of argumentation.A thorough study th作者: 膠水 時間: 2025-3-25 00:46 作者: white-matter 時間: 2025-3-25 04:35
W. Ehrenstein,W. Müller-Limmrothin my opinion’, ‘to my mind’, ‘the way I see it’ or ‘thus’ or ‘therefore’ may, for example, introduce a standpoint, and the use of ‘because’ or ‘given that’ argumentation. We call words and expressions that may refer to argumentative moves such as putting forward a standpoint or argumentation .. The作者: 一起平行 時間: 2025-3-25 08:50
Experimentation with Other Substances,ated that is aimed at resolving a difference of opinion on the merits (van Eemeren & Grootendorst 1984, 2004). This model specifies the dialectical stages that have to be distinguished in resolving a difference of opinion, as well as the verbal moves that serve a constructive purpose in the differen作者: aesthetic 時間: 2025-3-25 14:09 作者: disciplined 時間: 2025-3-25 18:18 作者: Euthyroid 時間: 2025-3-25 21:14
Partnership Dissolution Mechanisms,ablishment of the material (or substantial) starting points for the discussion. As early as in classical dialectics these starting points played a crucial part, since a dialectic was interpreted as a critical dialogue in which one party, the opponent, tries to refute the standpoint of the other part作者: 樂器演奏者 時間: 2025-3-26 02:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25041-5or (in the case of coordination) the applied arguments and the standpoint at issue. A central question when evaluating an argumentative discussion or text is whether the argument schemes that the defender of a particular standpoint uses are in fact appropriate and correctly applied. The pragma-diale作者: 侵略主義 時間: 2025-3-26 06:00
Interpretation, Analysis and Discussion,ist of a particular standpoint receives or expects criticism about one or more elements of his argumentation, he will have to bring forward more arguments to meet this criticism. Depending on the nature of the criticism and the manner in which the protagonist tries to defend himself against it, the 作者: falsehood 時間: 2025-3-26 12:05 作者: 寬宏大量 時間: 2025-3-26 12:59 作者: Foreknowledge 時間: 2025-3-26 20:30 作者: auxiliary 時間: 2025-3-26 23:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7607-0 determine whether the protagonist has conclusively defended his initial standpoint or the antagonist has successfully attacked that standpoint. The purpose of this is to be able to decide who has the right to maintain his initial position at the end of the discussion and who has to retract his initial position.作者: 使熄滅 時間: 2025-3-27 04:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5Argumentation Theory; English; dialectical profiles; discourse; formal logic; informal logic; issue; lingui作者: investigate 時間: 2025-3-27 05:33 作者: 四牛在彎曲 時間: 2025-3-27 11:53
The Identification of Argumentative Indicators,in my opinion’, ‘to my mind’, ‘the way I see it’ or ‘thus’ or ‘therefore’ may, for example, introduce a standpoint, and the use of ‘because’ or ‘given that’ argumentation. We call words and expressions that may refer to argumentative moves such as putting forward a standpoint or argumentation .. The作者: 男生戴手銬 時間: 2025-3-27 14:22
The Ideal Model of a Critical Discussion as a Theoretical Framework,ated that is aimed at resolving a difference of opinion on the merits (van Eemeren & Grootendorst 1984, 2004). This model specifies the dialectical stages that have to be distinguished in resolving a difference of opinion, as well as the verbal moves that serve a constructive purpose in the differen作者: Essential 時間: 2025-3-27 19:18 作者: 壓迫 時間: 2025-3-28 00:33
Indicators of the Distribution of the Burden of Proof,hey will follow in the discussion: which utterances must be defended by which party in the discussion – who has the burden of proof for what? – and which utterances do not have to be defended but can be used, instead, as starting points in the defence of other utterances under discussion? In order t作者: Promotion 時間: 2025-3-28 02:47
Indicators of Starting Points for the Discussion,ablishment of the material (or substantial) starting points for the discussion. As early as in classical dialectics these starting points played a crucial part, since a dialectic was interpreted as a critical dialogue in which one party, the opponent, tries to refute the standpoint of the other part作者: debunk 時間: 2025-3-28 08:42
Indicators of Argument Schemes,or (in the case of coordination) the applied arguments and the standpoint at issue. A central question when evaluating an argumentative discussion or text is whether the argument schemes that the defender of a particular standpoint uses are in fact appropriate and correctly applied. The pragma-diale作者: motivate 時間: 2025-3-28 11:09
