標題: Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; 8th International Wo Peter McBurney,Simon Parsons,Iyad Rahwan Conference proceedings 2012 Springer-Ve [打印本頁] 作者: 管玄樂團 時間: 2025-3-21 19:05
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網絡公開度
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋學科排名
作者: coagulation 時間: 2025-3-21 21:40
978-3-642-33151-0Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012作者: 怎樣才咆哮 時間: 2025-3-22 01:09
Peter McBurney,Simon Parsons,Iyad RahwanFast-track conference proceedings.State-of-the-art research.Up-to-date results作者: HAWK 時間: 2025-3-22 06:50 作者: 冷漠 時間: 2025-3-22 10:46
Springer Tracts in Advanced Roboticsl valued labels, coupled with an unsupervised learning algorithm that assigns consistent labels starting from a random initial assignment. The second approach regards argument (fuzzy) labels as degrees of certitude in the argument’s acceptability. This translates into a system of equations that prov作者: 松馳 時間: 2025-3-22 16:35
Nicolas Vandapel,Martial Hebert decision making, communication, negotiation) when confronted with specific multiagent problems. In this paper we take this idea one step further and develop the concept of a fully integrated argumentation-based agent architecture. Under this architecture, an agent is composed of a collection of mod作者: 初學者 時間: 2025-3-22 21:04 作者: 才能 時間: 2025-3-23 00:45 作者: Ordnance 時間: 2025-3-23 01:54
Micromechanics of Brittle Fracture,tion affecting subsequent arguments. Although such dynamic treatment is necessary to grasp the behavior of actual argumentation, semantics proposed to date can only handle the static aspects. Here, we present a new semantics that fits dynamic argumentation. We discuss what properties hold and explai作者: CLEAR 時間: 2025-3-23 06:50
Micromechanics of Brittle Fracture, objective is to arbitrate among conflicting viewpoints. Often, these debates are not entirely predetermined from the initial situation, which means that agents have a chance to influence the outcome in a way that fits their individual preferences. This paper introduces a simple and intuitive protoc作者: pulmonary-edema 時間: 2025-3-23 13:13
Griffith Theory of Brittle Failure,fications in the context of argumentative agents. The research can be integrated into the larger context of integrating logic and argumentation. The paper introduces distributed justification logic . as an extension of justification logic for multi-agent systems, and it also investigates the express作者: 可用 時間: 2025-3-23 15:08 作者: 騷動 時間: 2025-3-23 18:46
Friction and Sliding Phenomena, what information is shared or how aggressive the agent is. Several criteria have been proposed in the literature covering different aspects of what may matter to an agent, but it is not clear how to combine these criteria that are often incommensurable and partial. This paper is inspired by multi-a作者: hangdog 時間: 2025-3-24 01:36
Mervyn S. Paterson,Teng-fong Wonge you to do something? Were similar requests granted from similar agents in similar circumstances? What arguments were most persuasive? What are the costs involved in putting certain arguments forward? In this paper we present an agent decision-making mechanism where models of other agents are refin作者: jarring 時間: 2025-3-24 04:38 作者: 菊花 時間: 2025-3-24 08:21
Mervyn S. Paterson,Teng-fong Wongcentralized system. As a result, trust has been widely studied in multiagent systems and related fields such as the semantic web. Here we introduce a simple approach to reasoning about trust with logic, describe how it can be combined with reasoning about beliefs using logic, and demonstrate its use作者: 畫布 時間: 2025-3-24 10:52
Friction and Sliding Phenomena,earning experience for a student within a particular domain, where the system adjusts dynamically as the student makes mistakes and learns from them. The system needs to be able to represent beliefs about the student’s knowledge, and to update these beliefs as the student learns. The system also nee作者: 失誤 時間: 2025-3-24 15:26
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems978-3-642-33152-7Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349 作者: poliosis 時間: 2025-3-24 22:59
ABA: Argumentation Based Agentsn the modules. The paper lays the foundations of this approach, presents an abstract agent architecture and gives the general underlying argumentation machinery minimally required for building such agents, including the important aspects of inter-module coordination via argumentation. It presents th作者: 啤酒 時間: 2025-3-24 23:21
Practical Argumentation Semantics for Pareto Optimality and Its Relationships with ValuesWe give a generality order of four practical argumentation frameworks specified by taking into account Dungean semantics and Pareto optimality. We show that a member of preferred extensions of the most specific one is not just Pareto optimal, but also it is theoretically justified.作者: Melodrama 時間: 2025-3-25 06:25
Reasoning about and Discussing Preferences between Argumentstopics. Several mechanisms for using other agents’ knowledge have been proposed in the literature. This paper proposes to use different acceptance attitudes with respect to claims made in a dialogue and to store the source of those claims on a meta-level. In the meta-level, agents can then reason ab作者: 良心 時間: 2025-3-25 07:43
Nicolas Vandapel,Martial Hebertn the modules. The paper lays the foundations of this approach, presents an abstract agent architecture and gives the general underlying argumentation machinery minimally required for building such agents, including the important aspects of inter-module coordination via argumentation. It presents th作者: lacrimal-gland 時間: 2025-3-25 11:45
M. Zinn,O. Khatib,B. Roth,J. K. SalisburyWe give a generality order of four practical argumentation frameworks specified by taking into account Dungean semantics and Pareto optimality. We show that a member of preferred extensions of the most specific one is not just Pareto optimal, but also it is theoretically justified.作者: Commonwealth 時間: 2025-3-25 18:10 作者: Solace 時間: 2025-3-25 21:03 作者: implore 時間: 2025-3-26 03:36
ABA: Argumentation Based Agents decision making, communication, negotiation) when confronted with specific multiagent problems. In this paper we take this idea one step further and develop the concept of a fully integrated argumentation-based agent architecture. Under this architecture, an agent is composed of a collection of mod作者: Solace 時間: 2025-3-26 06:51
Practical Argumentation Semantics for Pareto Optimality and Its Relationships with Valuessuch argumentation should satisfy Pareto optimality because the consequences strongly depend on desires, aims, or values an individual agent or a group of agents has. We define a practical argumentation framework and two kinds of extensions, preferred and grounded extensions, with respect to each gr作者: 細胞膜 時間: 2025-3-26 09:34 作者: 進入 時間: 2025-3-26 14:42
A Semantics for Dynamic Argumentation Frameworkstion affecting subsequent arguments. Although such dynamic treatment is necessary to grasp the behavior of actual argumentation, semantics proposed to date can only handle the static aspects. Here, we present a new semantics that fits dynamic argumentation. We discuss what properties hold and explai作者: 可商量 時間: 2025-3-26 20:22 作者: ASSET 時間: 2025-3-26 23:17
Arguing with Justifications between Collaborating Agentsfications in the context of argumentative agents. The research can be integrated into the larger context of integrating logic and argumentation. The paper introduces distributed justification logic . as an extension of justification logic for multi-agent systems, and it also investigates the express作者: FLAGR 時間: 2025-3-27 02:09 作者: Crohns-disease 時間: 2025-3-27 05:50 作者: 分開 時間: 2025-3-27 11:27 作者: Mnemonics 時間: 2025-3-27 13:43 作者: 允許 時間: 2025-3-27 21:20 作者: 言行自由 時間: 2025-3-27 22:36 作者: Morsel 時間: 2025-3-28 05:16
Friction and Sliding Phenomena,tem needs to provide appropriate feedback to the student, in such a way as to encourage learning. The work presented here describes a framework for such a system, built upon our earlier work on education dialogues.作者: 饑荒 時間: 2025-3-28 09:16 作者: 玉米棒子 時間: 2025-3-28 12:41
Friction and Sliding Phenomena,der syncretized knowledge base. For the other, we first devise a new way of fusing two lattices through the lattice product, and then give a syncretic argumentation framework in which argumentation is done under the fused lattice. We further touch upon the third approach to the syncretic argumentation, by the lattice sum.作者: 威脅你 時間: 2025-3-28 18:01
Mervyn S. Paterson,Teng-fong Wonged through evidence from past dialogues, and where these models are used to guide future argumentation strategy. We empirically evaluate our approach to demonstrate that decision-theoretic and machine learning techniques can both significantly improve the cumulative utility of dialogical outcomes, and help to reduce communication overhead.作者: Enervate 時間: 2025-3-28 19:57
Syncretic Argumentation for Multi-agents by Lattice Homomorphism, Fusion and Sumder syncretized knowledge base. For the other, we first devise a new way of fusing two lattices through the lattice product, and then give a syncretic argumentation framework in which argumentation is done under the fused lattice. We further touch upon the third approach to the syncretic argumentation, by the lattice sum.作者: deadlock 時間: 2025-3-29 00:32
Argumentation Strategies for Collaborative Plan Resourcinged through evidence from past dialogues, and where these models are used to guide future argumentation strategy. We empirically evaluate our approach to demonstrate that decision-theoretic and machine learning techniques can both significantly improve the cumulative utility of dialogical outcomes, and help to reduce communication overhead.作者: 起草 時間: 2025-3-29 06:06
Conference proceedings 2012erence. All together the 13 papers included in the book give a representative overview on current research on argumentation in multi-agent systems. The papers are listed alphabetically by first author within three thematic topics: foundations and theory; argumentation and dialogue; and applications.作者: 無能性 時間: 2025-3-29 09:59
0302-9743 representative overview on current research on argumentation in multi-agent systems. The papers are listed alphabetically by first author within three thematic topics: foundations and theory; argumentation and dialogue; and applications.978-3-642-33151-0978-3-642-33152-7Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349 作者: Anhydrous 時間: 2025-3-29 15:13 作者: 口味 時間: 2025-3-29 18:02 作者: MIRTH 時間: 2025-3-29 20:16
On the Outcomes of Multiparty Persuasionllow this protocol. We investigate in particular under which conditions the debate is pre-determined or not, and whether the outcome coincides with the result obtained by merging the argumentation systems.作者: condemn 時間: 2025-3-30 03:40 作者: Intercept 時間: 2025-3-30 06:34 作者: A保存的 時間: 2025-3-30 10:04
Springer Tracts in Advanced Roboticsapproach regards argument (fuzzy) labels as degrees of certitude in the argument’s acceptability. This translates into a system of equations that provides among its solutions the labelings that describe complete extensions.
