標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; Second International Simon Parsons,Nicolas Maudet,Iyad Rahwan Conference proceedings 2006 Springer-Ve [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: osteomalacia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:13
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Parameter 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:43
Statistics for Computer Experimentstics — the study of language use in actual communication. Pragma dialectics thus combines a dialectical view of argumentative reasonableness with a pragmatic view of the verbal moves made in argumentative discourse. This paper provides an overview of the current state of the pragma-dialectical appro作者: PALSY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:41 作者: Postulate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:56
Statistics for Computer Experimentse of argument models from the informal logic community. The . of such argument systems is a necessary step if they are to be successfully deployed, and their properties rigorously understood. However, there is as yet no widely accepted approach to the formalisation of argument systems. In this paper作者: DRAFT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:54 作者: 社團(tuán) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:11 作者: 生氣的邊緣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32027-Xit to respond in a particular way. Two types of arguments are mainly used for that purpose: . and .. For example, if an agent receives a threat, this agent may accept the offer even if it is not fully “acceptable” for it (because otherwise really important goals would be threatened)..The contributio作者: Ondines-curse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:34 作者: 摸索 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:54
Designs for Computer Experimentss. While significant progress has been made in formalising argument-based communication, (possibly .) agent-level . as a . integration of rational agent reasoning and inter-agent argumentation dialogues have received fairly little attention. In this paper we propose the use of the InFFrA framework i作者: Frequency 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:55
Whispering Gallery Modes Microcavity,r, the negotiation process may become more efficient since the other agent can take this reason into account when making new offers. Also, if a reason for rejection can be disputed, the negotiation process may be of higher quality since flawed reasons may be revised as a result. This paper presents 作者: 到婚嫁年齡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4458-7 and Krabbe. In this paper we re-examine the Walton and Krabbe framework, concentrating on the preconditions for different types of dialogue and analyzing them in a systematic way. Doing so identifies a number of new kinds of dialogue missing from the framework. We discuss some of the more interesti作者: Angioplasty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:46 作者: 浮雕寶石 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:01
Optomechanical Microcavity Packaging,tocol for computing the credulous acceptance of conclusions in an argument system. In the new setup agents decide autonomously which issues need to be discussed, when to query other agents, when to keep on querying other agents, and when to settle for an answer. In this way, inter-agent disputes are作者: Keshan-disease 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:37 作者: 兇殘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:49
Whispering Gallery Modes Microcavity, needs help from the other agents. One of the solutions to this problem is to look for groups of agents which are able to perform the desired tasks better. Different algorithms have then been proposed for the task allocation via coalition formation. This last is generally seen as a two steps process作者: CHOIR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:44 作者: Cerumen 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:55
Phase Sensitive Imaging of Mechanical Modes, logic-based tools to support this activity could be potentially very useful for scientists to analyse new scientific findings using experimental results and established scientific knowledge. In effect, these logical tools would help scientists to present arguments and counterarguments for tentative作者: Lament 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:21
Using Scene Similarity for Place Labellingtive choice. The proposed setting has three main components: the agents, their reasoning capabilities, and a protocol. The agents are supposed to maintain beliefs about the environment and the other agents, together with their own goals. The beliefs are more or less certain and the goals may not hav作者: Bucket 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:32
Robot Assisted Fracture Reduction-making processes. The JITIK multiagent framework has been successfully used for just-in-time delivering highly customized notifications to the adequate users in large distributed organizations. However, in JITIK as well as in other similar approaches it is common to deal with incomplete information作者: BULLY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77457-0ns uttered by the agent — play a crucial role. The usual assumption made in this work is that the set of beliefs is static through the course of a dialogue, while the commitment store is dynamic. While the assumption of static beliefs is reasonable during the progress of the dialogue, it seems clear作者: 維持 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:52
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems978-3-540-36356-9Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349 作者: nostrum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:13
0302-9743 Overview: 978-3-540-36355-2978-3-540-36356-9Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349 作者: 少量 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:14 作者: 彩色的蠟筆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:16 作者: 過份 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:13 作者: 喃喃訴苦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:30 作者: Congeal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:11
Nested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actionsonflicting arguments, each of which defeat the other, one can then determine the preferred defeat and hence the preferred argument. We then apply this nested argumentation to selection of an agent’s preferred ‘instrumental’ arguments, where each such argument represents a plan of actions for realising an agent’s goals.作者: 和藹 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:20 作者: 條約 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578Argumentation; MAS; agent negotiation; argumentation dialogues; autonom; autonomous agents; decision makin作者: 血統(tǒng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:42 作者: 煉油廠 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:34
On the Meta-logic of Argumentsa hierarchical first-order meta-logic, in which statements in successively higher tiers of the argumentation hierarchy refer to statements further down the hierarchy. This enables us to give a clean formal separation between object-level statements, arguments made about these object level statements作者: allergy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:12
Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialoguether agents..On the other hand, a “simple” protocol for handling such arguments in a negotiation dialogue is given. This protocol shows when such arguments can be presented, how they are handled, and how they lead agents to change their goals and behaviors.作者: corporate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:43
Argument-Based Negotiation in a Social Contextlicts. The first of these allows agents to argue about the validity of each other’s social reasoning, whereas the second enables agents to exploit social influences by incorporating them as parameters within their negotiation. For each of these, we use our schema to systematically capture a comprehe作者: conceal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:48 作者: 頂點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:12 作者: patella 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:25 作者: BOLUS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:13 作者: 逗留 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:12 作者: 外表讀作 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:21 作者: kindred 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:47 作者: 錯(cuò) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:27 作者: 有常識(shí) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:11
Nested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actionsonflicting arguments, each of which defeat the other, one can then determine the preferred defeat and hence the preferred argument. We then apply this nested argumentation to selection of an agent’s preferred ‘instrumental’ arguments, where each such argument represents a plan of actions for realisi作者: 出來 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:36 作者: 中世紀(jì) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:50
Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogueit to respond in a particular way. Two types of arguments are mainly used for that purpose: . and .. For example, if an agent receives a threat, this agent may accept the offer even if it is not fully “acceptable” for it (because otherwise really important goals would be threatened)..The contributio作者: 最初 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:41
Argument-Based Negotiation in a Social Context the agents require the ability to generate arguments, which, in turn, demands four fundamental capabilities: a schema to reason in a social context, a mechanism to identify a suitable set of arguments, a language and a protocol to exchange these arguments, and a decision making functionality to gen作者: 友好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:21
Practical Strategic Reasoning and Adaptation in Rational Argument-Based Negotiations. While significant progress has been made in formalising argument-based communication, (possibly .) agent-level . as a . integration of rational agent reasoning and inter-agent argumentation dialogues have received fairly little attention. In this paper we propose the use of the InFFrA framework i作者: CUR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:50 作者: Folklore 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:10
New Types of Inter-agent Dialogues and Krabbe. In this paper we re-examine the Walton and Krabbe framework, concentrating on the preconditions for different types of dialogue and analyzing them in a systematic way. Doing so identifies a number of new kinds of dialogue missing from the framework. We discuss some of the more interesti作者: 全部逛商店 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:24 作者: Debark 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:19 作者: FECT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:06
Protocol Synthesis with Dialogue Structure Theorys these structures as transformations applied to a protocol language. Agents can have a controlled and verifiable mechanism to synthesise and communicate their interaction protocol during their participation in a multiagent system. This is in contrast to the approaches where agents must subscribe to作者: 感激小女 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:24 作者: 放牧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 19:00
Argumentation-Based Multi-agent Dialogues for DeliberationThe kind of deliberation that we are interested in is a process that combines both the selection of an overall goal, the reduction of this goal into sub-goals, and the formation of a plan to achieve the overall goal. We develop a mechanism for doing this, describe how this mechanism can be integrate作者: expository 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 00:39 作者: 起草 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 02:58 作者: 方舟 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 07:56 作者: interlude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 09:14 作者: expdient 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 16:39
