標題: Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; 7th International Wo Peter McBurney,Iyad Rahwan,Simon Parsons Conference proceedings 2011 Springer-Ve [打印本頁] 作者: 支票 時間: 2025-3-21 18:30
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網絡公開度
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 虛弱的神經 時間: 2025-3-21 22:26 作者: 卜聞 時間: 2025-3-22 00:33 作者: BROOK 時間: 2025-3-22 08:21
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125multi-agent societies, where agents have social relations between them. In addition, we have formalised our framework by defining an argumentation framework based on it... Coherence and Coordination, Multi-Agent Systems.作者: 燕麥 時間: 2025-3-22 11:41 作者: AGOG 時間: 2025-3-22 13:34 作者: GENUS 時間: 2025-3-22 18:05
Instrumental Rationalitye effects do not outweigh the benefits of achieving the goal. Its conclusion is a decision to bring about the means. The scheme can be reiterated until an implementable means is reached. In a particular context, resource limitations may warrant truncation of the reasoning... I.2.11 Multiagent systems. . Theory.作者: mighty 時間: 2025-3-22 22:16
A Formal Argumentation Framework for Deliberation Dialoguesthe proposals. This paper introduces a general framework for agent deliberation dialogues that uses an explicit reply structure to produce coherent dialogues, guides in outcome selection and provide pointers for agent strategies... I.2.11 [.] Distributed Artificial Intelligence— Languages and structures, multi-agent systems... Design, Languages.作者: Decibel 時間: 2025-3-23 02:31 作者: 不能妥協(xié) 時間: 2025-3-23 05:32 作者: 極大痛苦 時間: 2025-3-23 11:55
Computing Argumentation in Polynomial Number of BDD Operations: A Preliminary Reportrguments and defeats are encoded into BDDs so that an argumentation process can work on a set of arguments and defeats simultaneously in one BDD operation. As a result, the argumentation can be computed in polynomial number of BDD operations on the number of input sentences.作者: 獸群 時間: 2025-3-23 16:06
Liver Disease Due to Infection and Allergy,s to which systems of argumentation have been applied. Here we discuss the application of argumentation to reasoning about trust, identifying some of the components that an argumentation-based system for reasoning about trust would need to contain and sketching the work that would be required to provide such a system.作者: Conscientious 時間: 2025-3-23 18:50
Experimental Protocols in Biotechnologye imported, discussing complete calculi for argumentation, adequate model-checking and bisimulation games, and sketches an agenda for future research at the interface of modal logic and argumentation theory.作者: 音樂會 時間: 2025-3-24 01:16 作者: 惹人反感 時間: 2025-3-24 03:57
Conference proceedings 2011, held in Toronto, Canada in May 2010 as a satellite workshop of AAMAS 2010..The 14 revised full papers taken from ArgMAS 2010 were carefully reviewed and improved during two rounds of revision. Also included are 4 invited papers based on presentations on argumentation at the AAMAS 2010 main confere作者: Herbivorous 時間: 2025-3-24 07:21 作者: 在駕駛 時間: 2025-3-24 11:19 作者: Irascible 時間: 2025-3-24 14:58 作者: 小故事 時間: 2025-3-24 20:29 作者: 痛苦一下 時間: 2025-3-25 02:25 作者: 分開 時間: 2025-3-25 03:23 作者: DEAF 時間: 2025-3-25 07:31
Preference-Based Argumentation Capturing Prioritized Logic Programmingly we show the interesting result that, .-extensions of such a non-abstract . under stable semantics capture . answer sets of a PLP, which ensures the advantages as well as the correctness of our approach.作者: 迫擊炮 時間: 2025-3-25 13:59
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Dataeptable to each agent, but does not necessarily demand that the agents resolve or share their differing preferences. We give properties of our system and discuss possible extensions... I.2.11 Multiagent systems. .: Theory.作者: Deduct 時間: 2025-3-25 19:08 作者: phytochemicals 時間: 2025-3-25 20:46 作者: 沙發(fā) 時間: 2025-3-26 03:05
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125t would allow virtual agents that have sales goals to trigger persuasions with e-commerce’s customers. Then, we illustrate the proposed idea through its integration with an example from real-life....I.2.11 [.:] Intelligent Agents... Algorithms.作者: 浮雕 時間: 2025-3-26 06:48
Dev Bukhsh Singh,Rajesh Kumar Pathakompleteness of the sequence of steps, and termination. Under the higher degree of collaboration, the dialogue constitutes a sound and complete distributed argumentation process... I.2.11 [Distributed Artificial Intelligence]: Coherence and coordination... Theory, Design.作者: amorphous 時間: 2025-3-26 09:17 作者: Trabeculoplasty 時間: 2025-3-26 13:31 作者: 無法破譯 時間: 2025-3-26 19:28 作者: 鉤針織物 時間: 2025-3-26 22:35 作者: GRACE 時間: 2025-3-27 04:58
Towards a Dialectical Approach for Conversational Agents in Selling Situationst would allow virtual agents that have sales goals to trigger persuasions with e-commerce’s customers. Then, we illustrate the proposed idea through its integration with an example from real-life....I.2.11 [.:] Intelligent Agents... Algorithms.作者: 搬運工 時間: 2025-3-27 08:34 作者: NAVEN 時間: 2025-3-27 11:30 作者: Flatter 時間: 2025-3-27 16:14 作者: 免費 時間: 2025-3-27 20:52 作者: 蠟燭 時間: 2025-3-27 22:03 作者: 民間傳說 時間: 2025-3-28 04:53 作者: municipality 時間: 2025-3-28 09:41
An Argument-Based Multi-agent System for Information Integrationrchitecture for decision-support systems (DSS) that will combine database technologies, specifically federated databases, which we will cast as information agents, with an argumentation-based framework... I.2.4 [Artificial Intelligence]: Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods—Representation作者: entitle 時間: 2025-3-28 11:41
Liver Disease Due to Infection and Allergy,rchitecture for decision-support systems (DSS) that will combine database technologies, specifically federated databases, which we will cast as information agents, with an argumentation-based framework... I.2.4 [Artificial Intelligence]: Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods—Representation作者: Pedagogy 時間: 2025-3-28 17:16 作者: Eviction 時間: 2025-3-28 21:14 作者: GRIEF 時間: 2025-3-29 02:18
Bernhard Kittel,Kamil Marcinkiewiczd immediately contribute to realization of the goal, the goal is achievable, the means is permissible, no alternative means is preferable, and the side effects do not outweigh the benefits of achieving the goal. Its conclusion is a decision to bring about the means. The scheme can be reiterated unti作者: 使虛弱 時間: 2025-3-29 06:28
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Databecomes even more complicated when an agent is involved in a joint deliberation, as each agent will have its own preferred outcome which may change as new information is received from the other agents involved in the deliberation. We present an argumentation-based dialogue system that allows agents 作者: Femine 時間: 2025-3-29 09:24
Strategic Voting in the Laboratoryms and supply arguments. Existing models fail to capture the interplay between the provided arguments as well as successively selecting a winner from the proposals. This paper introduces a general framework for agent deliberation dialogues that uses an explicit reply structure to produce coherent di作者: 無關緊要 時間: 2025-3-29 12:45
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016645in multiagent systems (MAS). We will first discuss inductive learning and the role argumentation plays in multiagent inductive learning. Then we focus on how inductive learning can be used to realize argumentation in MAS based on empirical grounds. We present a MAS framework for empirical argumentat作者: 隼鷹 時間: 2025-3-29 18:07 作者: 珊瑚 時間: 2025-3-29 19:43
Anne L. Bezuidenhout,Robin K. Morrisesource availability constraints under which others operate. We present an efficient approach for identifying, learning and modeling the policies of others during collaborative problem solving activities. The mechanisms presented in this paper will enable agents to build more effective argumentation作者: SNEER 時間: 2025-3-30 02:48 作者: 我就不公正 時間: 2025-3-30 05:44
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125 generic framework for the computational representation of argument information. It is able to represent different types of complex arguments in open multi-agent societies, where agents have social relations between them. In addition, we have formalised our framework by defining an argumentation fra作者: NAUT 時間: 2025-3-30 10:46 作者: Bombast 時間: 2025-3-30 15:47 作者: synovium 時間: 2025-3-30 19:38
Liver Disease Due to Infection and Allergy, private, possibly large, databases. Each agent in the community has independent sources of information and each database could contain information that is potentially inconsistent and incomplete, both by itself and/or in conjunction with some of the others. These characteristics make the consolidat作者: Agnosia 時間: 2025-3-30 21:28
Experimental Protocols in Biotechnologyargumentation frameworks can be studied as Kripke frames. This simple observation allows us to import a number of techniques and results from modal logic to argumentation theory, and opens up new interesting avenues for further research. The paper gives a glimpse of the sort of techniques that can b作者: 并入 時間: 2025-3-31 01:54
Varsha Gupta,Baishnab Charan Tripathy classical Dung abstract argumentation framework. The system is built around Fuzzy Description Logic and exploits the integration of ontologies with argumentation theory, attaining the advantage of facilitating communication of domain knowledge between agents. The formal properties of fuzzy relation作者: 染色體 時間: 2025-3-31 07:01 作者: 盡責 時間: 2025-3-31 09:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17053-9ion in which all lines of argumentation are executed in succession, with the change of the agent’s knowledge base. This system was designed for grasping the behaviour of actual argumentation, but it has several limitations. In this paper, we propose an extended system in which these points are revis作者: landmark 時間: 2025-3-31 14:29 作者: 水槽 時間: 2025-3-31 21:07
Statistical tests for unrelated designs,at differ in the protocol used for argumentation, i.e. direct, synchronous, and dialectical argumentation protocols, the awareness that agents have on other agents beliefs, and different settings for the preferences of agents. We give a thorough investigation and classification of these scenarios em作者: overwrought 時間: 2025-3-31 23:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7241-7ation framework (.) to deal with additional preferences over a set of arguments. In our formalism, the semantics of such a . is given as .-extensions that are selected from extensions of acceptability semantics by taking into account such preferences. Second, using a prioritized logic program (PLP) 作者: 對手 時間: 2025-4-1 03:38
Peter McBurney,Iyad Rahwan,Simon Parsonsup-to-date results.fast track conference proceedings.state-of-the-art report作者: 匍匐前進 時間: 2025-4-1 07:06
Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/161536.jpg作者: 廚房里面 時間: 2025-4-1 11:45 作者: CURT 時間: 2025-4-1 16:21
Instrumental Rationalityd immediately contribute to realization of the goal, the goal is achievable, the means is permissible, no alternative means is preferable, and the side effects do not outweigh the benefits of achieving the goal. Its conclusion is a decision to bring about the means. The scheme can be reiterated unti作者: 腐爛 時間: 2025-4-1 20:20
Agreeing What to Dobecomes even more complicated when an agent is involved in a joint deliberation, as each agent will have its own preferred outcome which may change as new information is received from the other agents involved in the deliberation. We present an argumentation-based dialogue system that allows agents 作者: 現(xiàn)任者 時間: 2025-4-2 01:21 作者: 功多汁水 時間: 2025-4-2 03:09
Empirical Argumentation: Integrating Induction and Argumentation in MASin multiagent systems (MAS). We will first discuss inductive learning and the role argumentation plays in multiagent inductive learning. Then we focus on how inductive learning can be used to realize argumentation in MAS based on empirical grounds. We present a MAS framework for empirical argumentat
