標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; 6th International Wo Peter McBurney,Iyad Rahwan,Nicolas Maudet Conference proceedings 2010 Springer-V [打印本頁] 作者: 拖累 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:34
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: tackle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:48 作者: 四指套 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:08 作者: 機(jī)構(gòu) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:06 作者: 拖債 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:14 作者: 增強(qiáng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:53 作者: 狗舍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07980-6nd efficiency. However, many dialogue games are effectively based on propositional logic, which is not always sufficiently expressive for artificial reasoning. In particular they do not allow for a strong connection between computational models of dialogic argument and mature mathematical models of 作者: epidermis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:14 作者: Acclaim 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:57 作者: callous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:49 作者: 諂媚于性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28908-8ossible arguments that an agent can put forth, which should be selected in what circumstances. In this paper we propose a heuristic that implements one such strategy. The heuristic is built around opponent modelling, and operates by selecting the line of argument that yields maximal utility, based o作者: 省略 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:33 作者: evanescent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28908-8to be true. This paper presents a novel approach to find out every . (resp. .) explanation which is the set of hypotheses needed to . (resp. .) justify the argument supporting a disputer’s claim based on abductive knowledge base under the specified argumentation semantics. The main subject of this p作者: 責(zé)問 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:53 作者: 范圍廣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67895-4ch environments are characterized by the existence of heterogeneous agents that commit to different ontologies, with no prior assumptions regarding the use of shared vocabularies. Various approaches have therefore considered how mutually acceptable mappings may be determined dynamically between agen作者: 蹣跚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:58 作者: 有罪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14119-5lso play a role in agent decision making. This paper builds on several pieces of earlier work which resulted in a formalization of a model of emotions. We show how, in particular, the emotions of gratitude and displeasure and related emotions can be beneficially integrated into a model of decision m作者: 發(fā)誓放棄 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14119-5participants agents more human-like and to increase their flexibility in the negotiation process in group decision-making, the authors investigated the role of personality behaviours of participants applied to the conflict style theme. The negotiation is made in a bilateral way where both parties ar作者: MILL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:23
Strategic Voting in the Laboratorytion is an innovative research area that aims at solving this issue, where agents encapsulate different matching techniques and the distinct results are shared, compared, chosen and agreed. In this paper, we compare three argumentation frameworks, which consider different notions of acceptability: b作者: homocysteine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:52
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems978-3-642-12805-9Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349 作者: BLAZE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:53
0302-9743 Overview: 978-3-642-12804-2978-3-642-12805-9Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349 作者: meretricious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:06 作者: 博愛家 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:54
978-3-642-12804-2Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010作者: 興奮過度 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:32 作者: Adjourn 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:35 作者: 人類學(xué)家 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28908-8evious work of computing argumentation semantics in answer set programming (ASP). Thus this study eventually reveals the greatest advantage of applying ASP to the crucial decision problems in the research field of argumentation.作者: MENT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:19
V. P. Andreev,T. I. Kovaleva,I. N. Usovaer describes how these issues were resolved and implemented in PISA, and illustrates the operation of PISA using an example based on a dataset relating to nursery provision. Finally some experiments comparing PISA with other classifiers are reported.作者: 很像弓] 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67895-4he agents have to negotiate. In this paper, we propose an approach that combines modularization with argumentation to generate focused domains of discourse to facilitate communication. We empirically demonstrate that we can not only reduce the number of alignments required to reach consensus by an a作者: 昏暗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:39 作者: pacific 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:55
Strategic Argumentation in Rigorous Persuasion Dialoguer inconsistency in its knowledge base, but also the incompleteness of its knowledge; and (ii) that it thus provides wider scope for strategic sophistication in multi-agent dialogue. We make two linked observations relating to strategy in RPD. dialogues — first, that there are minimal sets of beliefs作者: 全國(guó)性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:11 作者: 杠桿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:50
Computing Abductive Argumentation in Answer Set Programmingevious work of computing argumentation semantics in answer set programming (ASP). Thus this study eventually reveals the greatest advantage of applying ASP to the crucial decision problems in the research field of argumentation.作者: 放逐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:16
Multi-Party Argument from Experienceer describes how these issues were resolved and implemented in PISA, and illustrates the operation of PISA using an example based on a dataset relating to nursery provision. Finally some experiments comparing PISA with other classifiers are reported.作者: 咒語 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:50
Using Ontology Modularization for Efficient Negotiation over Ontology Correspondences in MAShe agents have to negotiate. In this paper, we propose an approach that combines modularization with argumentation to generate focused domains of discourse to facilitate communication. We empirically demonstrate that we can not only reduce the number of alignments required to reach consensus by an a作者: 付出 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:52 作者: 疼死我了 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:51 作者: RAGE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:28
A Generative Dialogue System for Arguing about Plans in Situation Calculusistencies between basic beliefs regarding the state of the world or the specification of the planning operators..We introduce simple and efficient argument moves that enable discussion about planning steps, and show how these can be integrated into an existing protocol for belief argumentation. The 作者: WITH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:44 作者: Paradox 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:30
A Model for Integrating Dialogue and the Execution of Joint Plansneed for team members to communicate while the plan is being executed. Such communication is required, for example, to make sure that information critical to the plan is passed in time for it to be useful. In this paper we present a model for constructing joint plans for a team of agents that takes 作者: oncologist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:48 作者: 油膏 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:01
Strategic Argumentation in Rigorous Persuasion Dialoguend efficiency. However, many dialogue games are effectively based on propositional logic, which is not always sufficiently expressive for artificial reasoning. In particular they do not allow for a strong connection between computational models of dialogic argument and mature mathematical models of 作者: guzzle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:07 作者: 招待 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:56 作者: AWL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:07 作者: ingestion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:48
Arguing Using Opponent Modelsossible arguments that an agent can put forth, which should be selected in what circumstances. In this paper we propose a heuristic that implements one such strategy. The heuristic is built around opponent modelling, and operates by selecting the line of argument that yields maximal utility, based o作者: alliance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:24 作者: 上漲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:27
Computing Abductive Argumentation in Answer Set Programmingto be true. This paper presents a novel approach to find out every . (resp. .) explanation which is the set of hypotheses needed to . (resp. .) justify the argument supporting a disputer’s claim based on abductive knowledge base under the specified argumentation semantics. The main subject of this p作者: Resection 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:59 作者: 爭(zhēng)吵加 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 00:56 作者: 白楊魚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:14
Applying Dialogue Games to Manage Recommendation in Social Networksual recommender for its neighbours in the network. However, social networks are highly dynamic environments where the structure of the network and the information spread across it evolve quickly over time. In these settings, a suitable recommender must be able to manage continuous changes and to pro作者: Bucket 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:09
Emotions in Rational Decision Makinglso play a role in agent decision making. This paper builds on several pieces of earlier work which resulted in a formalization of a model of emotions. We show how, in particular, the emotions of gratitude and displeasure and related emotions can be beneficially integrated into a model of decision m作者: CHANT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 14:23
Using Personality Types to Support Argumentationparticipants agents more human-like and to increase their flexibility in the negotiation process in group decision-making, the authors investigated the role of personality behaviours of participants applied to the conflict style theme. The negotiation is made in a bilateral way where both parties ar作者: 車床 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 17:05
Comparing Argumentation Frameworks for Composite Ontology Matchingtion is an innovative research area that aims at solving this issue, where agents encapsulate different matching techniques and the distinct results are shared, compared, chosen and agreed. In this paper, we compare three argumentation frameworks, which consider different notions of acceptability: b作者: 他很靈活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 20:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1637-6resulting protocol is provably sound with regard to the defeasible semantics of the resulting agreements. We show how argument generation can be treated, for the specific task of argumentation about plans, by replacing the burden of finding proofs in a knowledge base by guided search.作者: 蹣跚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 04:11 作者: 錢財(cái) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 08:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28908-8arison of the framework to . is given and it is shown that the modeling specific scenarios of argumentation in the distributed setting bears a more rational representation. The framework described in this paper has been fully implemented and a short description of its features is given.作者: 侵蝕 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 12:32
Strategic Voting in the Laboratoryguments. We evaluate these frameworks using realistic ontologies from an established evaluation test case. The best matcher varies depending on specific characteristics of each set, while considering voting on arguments the results are similar to the best matchers for all cases.作者: 語言學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 16:53
Realizing Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems Using Defeasible Logic Programmingarison of the framework to . is given and it is shown that the modeling specific scenarios of argumentation in the distributed setting bears a more rational representation. The framework described in this paper has been fully implemented and a short description of its features is given.
