標題: Titlebook: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective; Frans H. van Eemeren Textbook 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Pragma-Dial [打印本頁] 作者: gloomy 時間: 2025-3-21 19:19
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective被引頻次
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective年度引用
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective讀者反饋
書目名稱Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective讀者反饋學科排名
作者: REIGN 時間: 2025-3-21 21:31
Frans H. van EemerenOffers an introduction into argumentation theory viewed from a novel perspective.Coverage creates an interdisciplinary pragma-dialectical perspective.Provides readers with a better and more complete u作者: 入伍儀式 時間: 2025-3-22 01:22 作者: Expurgate 時間: 2025-3-22 06:50 作者: 概觀 時間: 2025-3-22 09:08 作者: SLAY 時間: 2025-3-22 15:01 作者: 擋泥板 時間: 2025-3-22 17:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13643-6e the methodological starting points of the theorizing. First the required functionalization of argumentation theory is discussed and it is described how this meta-theoretical principle is to be substantiated. Functionalization makes up of an approach of argumentation that is merely structural. Seco作者: Ambiguous 時間: 2025-3-22 22:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13643-6he merits. It is explained that a critical discussion encompasses four stages: the confrontation stage, the opening stage, the argumentation stage, and the concluding stage. Next the argumentative moves that are instrumental in each of these stages are described in terms of speech acts. After the no作者: Eulogy 時間: 2025-3-23 05:26 作者: 混沌 時間: 2025-3-23 06:58
Experimental Innovations in Surface Scienceve relevance of argumentative moves, on the other hand, descriptive empirical research of argumentative discourse is reported. First attention is paid to qualitative research of argumentative indicators that are used by ordinary arguers in interpreting argumentative moves. Next an overview is provid作者: adj憂郁的 時間: 2025-3-23 11:53 作者: 陳腐的人 時間: 2025-3-23 14:31 作者: exhilaration 時間: 2025-3-23 20:27
The Force and the Reason of Experiment,or conducting argumentative discourse. These communicative activity types can be characterized argumentatively by describing the specific conventionalization that is instrumental to realizing their institutional point. Starting from the argumentative characterization, the institutional preconditions作者: 嚴厲批評 時間: 2025-3-24 00:50 作者: 歡騰 時間: 2025-3-24 03:34 作者: 休息 時間: 2025-3-24 09:46 作者: 連接 時間: 2025-3-24 10:40
A Model of a Critical Discussion,tion of profiles of dialectically relevant argumentative moves has been introduced as a way of portraying the various dialectical routes that can be chosen in a critical discussion, dialectical profiles are sketched of the main types of argumentation: symptomatic argumentation, comparison argumentation, and causal argumentation.作者: critique 時間: 2025-3-24 17:52
1566-7650 rspective.Provides readers with a better and more complete u.The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it 作者: jeopardize 時間: 2025-3-24 19:04
Lecture Notes in Computer Science and fallacy. Then the research program of argumentation theory is explained, consisting of a philosophical, a theoretical, an empirical, an analytical, and a practical component. The chapter is concluded by a brief overview of the various approaches that give shape to the dialectical and the rhetorical perspectives on argumentation.作者: 騙子 時間: 2025-3-25 01:08
Argumentation Theory as a Discipline, and fallacy. Then the research program of argumentation theory is explained, consisting of a philosophical, a theoretical, an empirical, an analytical, and a practical component. The chapter is concluded by a brief overview of the various approaches that give shape to the dialectical and the rhetorical perspectives on argumentation.作者: 廚師 時間: 2025-3-25 05:54
Textbook 2018umentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains 作者: 增長 時間: 2025-3-25 07:37
Experimental Innovations in Surface Scienceliterature are all violations of these rules. To conclude it is explained what the special characteristics are of the pragma-dialectical treatment of the fallacies that differentiate this approach from other approaches.作者: Femine 時間: 2025-3-25 14:22 作者: 險代理人 時間: 2025-3-25 18:33
The Nine Lives of Gregor Mendel,is explained that further research is required concerning other prototypical argumentative patterns, “stereotypical” argumentative patterns which occur frequently, differences caused by the cultural or ideological background, “strategic scenarios”, “argumentative styles”, and interventions based on observations of argumentative patterns.作者: Spinal-Tap 時間: 2025-3-25 22:18 作者: 不能強迫我 時間: 2025-3-26 01:00
Analysis as Resolution-Oriented Reconstruction,text like this can lead to an adequate analytic overview. The chapter is concluded by an exemplary analysis of a specific case and an exposition of the resources that are brought to bear in accounting for the analytic overview resulting from the analysis.作者: Sarcoma 時間: 2025-3-26 05:03 作者: 擁護 時間: 2025-3-26 10:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13643-6nd, socialization is discussed, which brings in the dialogical dimension. Third, externalization concentrates on avoiding speculative psychologizing by making the arguers’ commitments explicit. Fourth, dialectification brings in the critical dimension of problem-valid standards of reasonableness.作者: ITCH 時間: 2025-3-26 14:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13643-6tion of profiles of dialectically relevant argumentative moves has been introduced as a way of portraying the various dialectical routes that can be chosen in a critical discussion, dialectical profiles are sketched of the main types of argumentation: symptomatic argumentation, comparison argumentation, and causal argumentation.作者: 極力證明 時間: 2025-3-26 19:20
Experimental Innovations in Surface Scienceotential conventional validity of some representative parts of the code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse. The chapter concludes with the introduction of empirical research of hidden fallaciousness in argumentative discourse that is caused by the mimicking of reasonable argumentative moves.作者: 條約 時間: 2025-3-26 23:28
The Force and the Reason of Experiment,c (cluster of) communicative activity type(s). The chapter concludes with an overview of research concerning the influence of the institutional preconditions on the strategic manoeuvring in?communicative activity types from various domains.作者: 沉默 時間: 2025-3-27 02:17
Results - fluidised bed calcium looping,contributes and how it relates to the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation that has been expounded in this volume. In conclusion some future prospects are highlighted, especially for further development of the pragma-dialectical approach.作者: 多樣 時間: 2025-3-27 05:43 作者: 翻布尋找 時間: 2025-3-27 12:43
Distinguishing Between Different Kinds of Argumentative Practices,c (cluster of) communicative activity type(s). The chapter concludes with an overview of research concerning the influence of the institutional preconditions on the strategic manoeuvring in?communicative activity types from various domains.作者: chronology 時間: 2025-3-27 14:25
Pragma-Dialectics Amidst Other Approaches to Argumentation,contributes and how it relates to the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation that has been expounded in this volume. In conclusion some future prospects are highlighted, especially for further development of the pragma-dialectical approach.作者: Dysarthria 時間: 2025-3-27 18:12 作者: Cryptic 時間: 2025-3-28 01:25 作者: FIR 時間: 2025-3-28 04:10 作者: ATP861 時間: 2025-3-28 08:43 作者: faction 時間: 2025-3-28 13:37 作者: 的事物 時間: 2025-3-28 17:02
Argumentation Theory as a Discipline,ecified. Next, some crucial concepts of argumentation theory are discussed: standpoint, unexpressed premise, argument scheme, argumentation structure, and fallacy. Then the research program of argumentation theory is explained, consisting of a philosophical, a theoretical, an empirical, an analytica作者: 流出 時間: 2025-3-28 21:39
Building a Theory of Argumentation,e the methodological starting points of the theorizing. First the required functionalization of argumentation theory is discussed and it is described how this meta-theoretical principle is to be substantiated. Functionalization makes up of an approach of argumentation that is merely structural. Seco作者: Insul島 時間: 2025-3-28 23:32
A Model of a Critical Discussion,he merits. It is explained that a critical discussion encompasses four stages: the confrontation stage, the opening stage, the argumentation stage, and the concluding stage. Next the argumentative moves that are instrumental in each of these stages are described in terms of speech acts. After the no作者: Bucket 時間: 2025-3-29 04:37
Critical Discussion and the Identification of Fallacies,ditionally known as fallacies. Therefore the way in which the fallacies are treated is the litmus test of the problem-validity of the code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse that is derived from the pragma-dialectical procedure for conducting a critical discussion. After the rules of 作者: dura-mater 時間: 2025-3-29 10:52
Descriptive Studies of Argumentative Discourse,ve relevance of argumentative moves, on the other hand, descriptive empirical research of argumentative discourse is reported. First attention is paid to qualitative research of argumentative indicators that are used by ordinary arguers in interpreting argumentative moves. Next an overview is provid作者: Concrete 時間: 2025-3-29 13:17
Analysis as Resolution-Oriented Reconstruction,lts in an analytic overview of the crucial components of the discourse. As is demonstrated with the help of an argumentative text, in a theoretically-motivated reconstruction in accordance with the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation four kinds of analytic operations need to be carried out, w作者: judiciousness 時間: 2025-3-29 18:57
