標題: Titlebook: Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation; Thomas Bustamante,Christian Dahlman Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switz [打印本頁] 作者: Hayes 時間: 2025-3-21 19:46
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation被引頻次
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation年度引用
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation讀者反饋
書目名稱Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation讀者反饋學科排名
作者: Instantaneous 時間: 2025-3-21 22:54 作者: Intercept 時間: 2025-3-22 00:48 作者: negligence 時間: 2025-3-22 06:52 作者: Introvert 時間: 2025-3-22 10:20
Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation. The Case of ‘Insusts itself in . and . In analyzing strategic maneuvering one category of parameters to be considered are the constraints of the institutional context. In this paper I explore the institutional constraints for topical selection for the legal argumentative activity type .. I will make a distinction be作者: 細胞膜 時間: 2025-3-22 14:36
One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Actd reinforced by . briefs supporting those appeals. Specifically, I describe the role of . briefs commonly used in appellate argumentation in the United States. Then I identify six characteristics of these arguments: clarifying a legal principle, emphasizing amici interests, refuting oppositions’ arg作者: 吸引人的花招 時間: 2025-3-22 18:16
Anti-Theoretical Claims About Legal Interpretation: The Argument Behind the Fallacythat lawyers should adopt while interpreting statutes and other legal materials. Some of these theorists hold that theory and philosophy have nothing to offer jurists and play a very limited role in the justification of a legal decision. I call this thesis the “Anti-Theoretical Claim”. This claim ap作者: 勾引 時間: 2025-3-23 01:05
Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contestions of legal interpretation and general written-law norms. The paper describes and compares two theories: the frames of interpretations theory and the container-retrieval theory (in its conventional linguistic meaning variety). By means of a critical survey, the frames of interpretations theory wil作者: 大看臺 時間: 2025-3-23 02:37
Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholdstatements, generation of arguments that support or demote the interpretive statements, and comparison and balancing of arguments supporting incompatible interpretive statements. The focus of the paper is on the third layer. A case study is presented to demonstrate how a court uses a technique referr作者: mediocrity 時間: 2025-3-23 08:24 作者: 過份艷麗 時間: 2025-3-23 13:41 作者: 表示向前 時間: 2025-3-23 17:45 作者: Parameter 時間: 2025-3-23 21:20
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation978-3-319-16148-8Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315 作者: 約會 時間: 2025-3-24 00:20 作者: BOOM 時間: 2025-3-24 03:13 作者: emission 時間: 2025-3-24 09:33
M. P. McGarry,A. M. Miller,D. G. Colleygal decision maker to assess, as the legal decision maker – who lacks expert knowledge on the subject issue – must distinguish between experts that are highly reliable and experts that are less reliable. A methodology for the assessment of the expert testimony has been suggested previously, in the w作者: Devastate 時間: 2025-3-24 13:32 作者: 褲子 時間: 2025-3-24 18:00 作者: paleolithic 時間: 2025-3-24 22:52
Experimental Hematology Today 1978h the logical validity of this argument. Once established its logical validity, I shall try to argue that the second premise of the Sorites argument – the premise in accordance with if an individual . has the property . by having . unities of something, then another individual . which has .1 unities作者: Paraplegia 時間: 2025-3-25 00:02
Experimental Hematology Today 1978sts itself in . and . In analyzing strategic maneuvering one category of parameters to be considered are the constraints of the institutional context. In this paper I explore the institutional constraints for topical selection for the legal argumentative activity type .. I will make a distinction be作者: 疲憊的老馬 時間: 2025-3-25 05:16 作者: 帶來的感覺 時間: 2025-3-25 10:37 作者: GOAT 時間: 2025-3-25 15:43 作者: Cultivate 時間: 2025-3-25 18:27
Experimental Hematology Today 1979tatements, generation of arguments that support or demote the interpretive statements, and comparison and balancing of arguments supporting incompatible interpretive statements. The focus of the paper is on the third layer. A case study is presented to demonstrate how a court uses a technique referr作者: Tinea-Capitis 時間: 2025-3-25 23:40 作者: 膠水 時間: 2025-3-26 00:33
Ger van den Engh,Jan Visser,Barbara Trasknorm for judges in the application of law implies that they take into account a combination of different considerations of a normative and factual nature with the aim of reconciling the requirements of abstract formal justice and justice and fairness in the concrete case. Although reasonableness is 作者: Popcorn 時間: 2025-3-26 06:09 作者: 含水層 時間: 2025-3-26 11:15 作者: bizarre 時間: 2025-3-26 12:58
978-3-319-35487-3Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015作者: Atmosphere 時間: 2025-3-26 19:19
Anti-Theoretical Claims About Legal Interpretation: The Argument Behind the Fallacyhe strong version contains a performative contradiction, for it contains an implicit theoretical position about legal interpretation, the weak variant cannot be grounded without a moral argument to defend the value of incompletely theorized agreements, which is missing in the reasoning of its suppor作者: ANTE 時間: 2025-3-26 23:08
Argumentation from Reasonableness in the Justification of Judicial Decisionsvelop an argumentation model for the rational reconstruction that enables the analyst to make explicit the different considerations underlying a decision that is based on reasonableness so that they can be submitted to rational critique. To do justice to the context-dependency of the concept of reas作者: 有抱負者 時間: 2025-3-27 04:41
1572-4395 be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task. .978-3-319-35487-3978-3-319-16148-8Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315 作者: FECT 時間: 2025-3-27 05:20 作者: notice 時間: 2025-3-27 13:18
Ger van den Engh,Jan Visser,Barbara Traskvelop an argumentation model for the rational reconstruction that enables the analyst to make explicit the different considerations underlying a decision that is based on reasonableness so that they can be submitted to rational critique. To do justice to the context-dependency of the concept of reas作者: THROB 時間: 2025-3-27 15:52 作者: 罵人有污點 時間: 2025-3-27 18:34 作者: SIT 時間: 2025-3-28 00:30
An Analysis of Some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Lawthe conceptual dichotomy first/second interpretation, the systematizing tools employed by jurists in order to create, avoid, or ascertain systematic defects of the law, such as normative gaps and inconsistencies. The operations consisting in ordering legal materials in light of a set of underlying principles are finally examined.作者: 不能約 時間: 2025-3-28 02:24 作者: 小故事 時間: 2025-3-28 06:33 作者: gene-therapy 時間: 2025-3-28 12:50 作者: Priapism 時間: 2025-3-28 15:26 作者: inflame 時間: 2025-3-28 22:41 作者: 溫和女人 時間: 2025-3-29 01:19
The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument the premise in accordance with if an individual . has the property . by having . unities of something, then another individual . which has .1 unities is also P- in this kind of argument is always false; finally I shall draw some conclusions as to the way to stop the Slippery Slope.作者: Exposition 時間: 2025-3-29 03:54
Institutional Constraints of Topical Strategic Maneuvering in Legal Argumentation. The Case of ‘Insu In this paper I explore the institutional constraints for topical selection for the legal argumentative activity type .. I will make a distinction between statutory constraints, constraints developed in case law and constraints regarding language use and the logic of conversational implicatures.作者: 亞麻制品 時間: 2025-3-29 10:50 作者: 小樣他閑聊 時間: 2025-3-29 14:54 作者: LAP 時間: 2025-3-29 19:36
Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibilitycognized. The decrease in status can occur in the eyes of the interlocutor herself, as seen in cases of ., or in the eyes of others in the epistemic community, as in the case of .. Both of these will be discussed as ways in which an ad hominem fallacy can constitute an .作者: nitroglycerin 時間: 2025-3-29 22:50 作者: 厚顏 時間: 2025-3-30 00:17
Book 2015e sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task. .作者: 危險 時間: 2025-3-30 04:19 作者: 跟隨 時間: 2025-3-30 09:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25807-1cognized. The decrease in status can occur in the eyes of the interlocutor herself, as seen in cases of ., or in the eyes of others in the epistemic community, as in the case of .. Both of these will be discussed as ways in which an ad hominem fallacy can constitute an .
