標題: Titlebook: Argument Structure:; Representation and T James B. Freeman Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Argument.Argument Diagrammin [打印本頁] 作者: 營養(yǎng)品 時間: 2025-3-21 17:14
書目名稱Argument Structure:影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argument Structure:影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Argument Structure:網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Argument Structure:網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Argument Structure:被引頻次
書目名稱Argument Structure:被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Argument Structure:年度引用
書目名稱Argument Structure:年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Argument Structure:讀者反饋
書目名稱Argument Structure:讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 上下連貫 時間: 2025-3-21 22:57
Recognition of Hemopoietic Progenitorsstical report. Statistical reports summarize observations of particulars, and serve as backing for a corresponding warrant of the form “An . may be taken to be a ..” The general premise, then, does not express a universal proposition about all .’s, if the class of .’s is open ended or unlimited. Tou作者: achlorhydria 時間: 2025-3-22 01:55 作者: heterodox 時間: 2025-3-22 08:11 作者: installment 時間: 2025-3-22 11:58 作者: 淡紫色花 時間: 2025-3-22 14:07
Recognition of Hemopoietic Progenitorsgrounds have a bearing on the conclusion. However, we do not follow Hitchcock in holding that virtually no arguments have non-explicit premises. With each argument we may identify an associated generalization, the counterpart of a warrant. Regarding the function of that generalization as an inferenc作者: Lobotomy 時間: 2025-3-22 20:22 作者: 厚顏 時間: 2025-3-22 23:13 作者: Host142 時間: 2025-3-23 04:42
,Toulmin’s Problematic Notion of Warrant,stical report. Statistical reports summarize observations of particulars, and serve as backing for a corresponding warrant of the form “An . may be taken to be a ..” The general premise, then, does not express a universal proposition about all .’s, if the class of .’s is open ended or unlimited. Tou作者: 膽小鬼 時間: 2025-3-23 07:56
,The Linked-Convergent Distinction—A First Approximation,o distinguish linked from convergent structure are ambiguous between relevance and modality. We test this distinction against several hard cases and find that it preserves intuitions. In particular, the case where the falsity of one independently relevant premise would defeat the force of the others作者: Increment 時間: 2025-3-23 11:25
Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective: The Linked-Convergent Versus Multiple-Co-ordinativl evaluation of arguments. If one convergent premise is unacceptable, the remaining premises may still be acceptable and adequate grounds for the conclusion. But if a linked premise is unacceptable, the entire reason of which it is a factor is unacceptable. Keeping these two pairs of distinctions se作者: Incorporate 時間: 2025-3-23 17:14
,The Linked-Convergent Distinction–Refining the Criterion,ion for making the linked-convergent distinction. We criticize a number of tests for making the distinction as involving counterintuitive or anomalous results because they apply semantic considerations to do a syntactic job. We argue that recognizing that premises may function as counter-defeaters i作者: Ergots 時間: 2025-3-23 19:03 作者: 陰郁 時間: 2025-3-23 22:24 作者: 四目在模仿 時間: 2025-3-24 05:29
James B. FreemanComprehensive dialectical theory representing argument structures incorporating Toulmin model insights.Defends the linked-convergent distinction in depth, responding to virtually all recent critics in作者: 設(shè)想 時間: 2025-3-24 08:29
Argumentation Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/161522.jpg作者: Odyssey 時間: 2025-3-24 13:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-77922-3circles and arrows due to Beardsley and Thomas from Toulmin’s layout of arguments. Although Thomas has shown how the standard approach may accommodate arguments with suppositions, representing the structure of arguments replying to objections needs extension of the method through incorporating eleme作者: 故意釣到白楊 時間: 2025-3-24 14:56 作者: GRIEF 時間: 2025-3-24 23:01 作者: 暫時別動 時間: 2025-3-25 03:02 作者: 總 時間: 2025-3-25 05:05
M. P. McGarry,A. M. Miller,D. G. Colleyists of a series of independent arguments each intended to be sufficient to justify accepting or rejecting some viewpoint. In co-ordinatively compound argumentation, the arguments are only sufficient together. In a critical discussion, the proponent may present a number of arguments for his viewpoin作者: FRAX-tool 時間: 2025-3-25 07:29
Antony W. Burgess,Donald Metcalfter. These habits may be formulated as inference rules. We may thus understand relevance as a ternary relation holding between statements P and Q (or a set of statements {P., P., …, P.} and Q), and a set of inference rules .. P is relevant to Q with respect to . if and only if P/Q instances some rul作者: 暴發(fā)戶 時間: 2025-3-25 12:23 作者: 游行 時間: 2025-3-25 16:41 作者: CRATE 時間: 2025-3-25 21:47
Book 2011del. A theoretical justification of this method through a dialectical understanding of argument, a critical examination of Toulmin on warrants, a thorough discussion of the linked-convergent distinction, and an account of the proper reconstruction of enthymemes follows.作者: Mingle 時間: 2025-3-26 01:58 作者: STENT 時間: 2025-3-26 07:38 作者: Detain 時間: 2025-3-26 10:58
Argument Structure:978-94-007-0357-5Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907 作者: Erythropoietin 時間: 2025-3-26 14:35 作者: 運動吧 時間: 2025-3-26 17:53 作者: 情感 時間: 2025-3-26 22:09 作者: Bureaucracy 時間: 2025-3-27 01:21 作者: ANTH 時間: 2025-3-27 08:17
An Approach to Argument Macrostructure, distinctions can be straightforwardly formulated. These questions raise evaluative issues, connecting structural analysis with evaluation. We conclude the chapter by comparing and contrasting our method with Wigmore’s chart method and Pollock’s inference graphs.作者: aspersion 時間: 2025-3-27 09:49
An Approach to Argument Macrostructure,circles and arrows due to Beardsley and Thomas from Toulmin’s layout of arguments. Although Thomas has shown how the standard approach may accommodate arguments with suppositions, representing the structure of arguments replying to objections needs extension of the method through incorporating eleme作者: PTCA635 時間: 2025-3-27 16:29
The Dialectical Nature of Argument,in addition are committed to the critical testing of their viewpoints. In a basic dialectical situation, exactly one participant propounds a viewpoint and responds to the critical questions of exactly one challenger. The situation is dialectical since opposition is involved, the participants proceed作者: 外科醫(yī)生 時間: 2025-3-27 19:51 作者: 浸軟 時間: 2025-3-27 23:07 作者: Torrid 時間: 2025-3-28 02:09 作者: Conduit 時間: 2025-3-28 08:13
,The Linked-Convergent Distinction–Refining the Criterion,ter. These habits may be formulated as inference rules. We may thus understand relevance as a ternary relation holding between statements P and Q (or a set of statements {P., P., …, P.} and Q), and a set of inference rules .. P is relevant to Q with respect to . if and only if P/Q instances some rul作者: bourgeois 時間: 2025-3-28 13:03
