標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Argument Evaluation and Evidence; Douglas Walton Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 Abductive Reasoning.Antiphon [打印本頁] 作者: 指責(zé) 時間: 2025-3-21 16:47
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence被引頻次
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence年度引用
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence讀者反饋
書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: paragon 時間: 2025-3-21 23:52
Christoph Luetge,Matthias Uhl,Hannes Ruschnations contain reasoning, (2) to show how arguments and explanations are woven together in evidential reasoning, (3) to introduce the form of argument called inference to the best explanation, (4) and to show the importance of this form of reasoning for the study of evidential reasoning and argumentation.作者: decode 時間: 2025-3-22 04:10 作者: Predigest 時間: 2025-3-22 05:43 作者: CHANT 時間: 2025-3-22 10:51
Introduction to Argument and Explanation,nations contain reasoning, (2) to show how arguments and explanations are woven together in evidential reasoning, (3) to introduce the form of argument called inference to the best explanation, (4) and to show the importance of this form of reasoning for the study of evidential reasoning and argumentation.作者: artless 時間: 2025-3-22 13:00
Inference to the Best Explanation, pro-contra argumentation used in evidential reasoning in a criminal trial of a highly typical sort. The chapter offers the beginnings of a solution to the technical problem of combining argument and explanation in such cases, pointing the way forward to Chap. ., where a method of evaluating explanations is built up.作者: commensurate 時間: 2025-3-22 18:04 作者: vasculitis 時間: 2025-3-22 23:16
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409805odel to determine whether what the expert says is acceptable or not. One of the critical questions raises the issue of trust, and a central problem is to determine how the other critical questions fit with this one. The chapter studies how trust is related to argument from expert opinion in formal computational argumentation models.作者: ALIBI 時間: 2025-3-23 02:24
Materials, Materiality, New Materialism,on tools to enable us to judge whether a given instance is a reasonable argument or not and how to adjudicate cases where an allegation of drawing a hasty conclusion or even committing a fallacy is made.作者: Preamble 時間: 2025-3-23 07:13 作者: xanthelasma 時間: 2025-3-23 12:37 作者: Feckless 時間: 2025-3-23 16:49 作者: acrobat 時間: 2025-3-23 21:22 作者: 煩人 時間: 2025-3-24 00:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19626-8Abductive Reasoning; Antiphon Case; Argument and Evidence with Explanation; Burdens of Proof; Carneades 作者: 刺耳的聲音 時間: 2025-3-24 03:10
978-3-319-36755-2Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016作者: Endoscope 時間: 2025-3-24 08:47 作者: TEM 時間: 2025-3-24 13:36 作者: narcissism 時間: 2025-3-24 18:04 作者: 道學(xué)氣 時間: 2025-3-24 21:41 作者: 謙虛的人 時間: 2025-3-24 23:51 作者: Missile 時間: 2025-3-25 05:37
Materials, Materiality, New Materialism,l conclusion is drawn from statistical correlations. Three current examples of arguing from correlation to causation that are based on scientific reasoning and that are of broad public concern as health issues are described and evaluated in this chapter. The first one concerns the question of whethe作者: 粗魯性質(zhì) 時間: 2025-3-25 07:48 作者: 遺棄 時間: 2025-3-25 12:54 作者: CON 時間: 2025-3-25 19:09 作者: KEGEL 時間: 2025-3-25 21:45 作者: Parley 時間: 2025-3-26 01:42 作者: Induction 時間: 2025-3-26 06:30 作者: Enliven 時間: 2025-3-26 08:59 作者: overrule 時間: 2025-3-26 14:25 作者: OREX 時間: 2025-3-26 17:47 作者: Stable-Angina 時間: 2025-3-26 22:14 作者: painkillers 時間: 2025-3-27 01:41 作者: hauteur 時間: 2025-3-27 06:10 作者: Antimicrobial 時間: 2025-3-27 11:32 作者: Anecdote 時間: 2025-3-27 14:55
A Dialogue System for Evaluating Explanations, formal hybrid theory. Springer, Dordrecht, 2011) which combines explanations and arguments to include a method of testing stories called examination dialogue. In this type of dialogue an explanation can be probed and tested by arguments. The result is a method of evaluating explanations.作者: CRUE 時間: 2025-3-27 18:14 作者: accrete 時間: 2025-3-28 00:25
Evidence and Argument Evaluation,n ambiguity in the use of the term ‘evidence’. Used in a broader sense, ‘evidence’ can include any argument presented to support or attack a claim. In a narrower sense, ‘evidence’ refers to particular kinds of arguments, such as those based on observations, factual findings, statistics, experimental作者: Congregate 時間: 2025-3-28 03:27 作者: dapper 時間: 2025-3-28 09:26
Christoph Luetge,Hannes Rusch,Matthias Uhl formal hybrid theory. Springer, Dordrecht, 2011) which combines explanations and arguments to include a method of testing stories called examination dialogue. In this type of dialogue an explanation can be probed and tested by arguments. The result is a method of evaluating explanations.作者: Mucosa 時間: 2025-3-28 11:16
Experimental Film and Artists’ Moving Imagehe model, knowledge is established in a multiagent inquiry in which agents take part in building explanations of the facts comprising the evidence that are subject to critical questioning and counter-arguments.作者: Agronomy 時間: 2025-3-28 18:12 作者: 錢財 時間: 2025-3-28 21:35
Alcohol Effects on the Dorsal Striatume foundation of the planning system, but this structure differs through its interface which is to move more towards a planning language based on the blackboard architecture, hypertext and recent planning research.
