標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals; Implications for the Tanjina Sharmin Book 2020 The Editor [打印本頁] 作者: 麻煩 時間: 2025-3-21 19:29
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals被引頻次
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals年度引用
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals讀者反饋
書目名稱Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Accord 時間: 2025-3-21 22:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3730-1MFN; International Investment Agreements; Investor-State Arbitration; Expansive Interpretation; Scope作者: 拖網(wǎng) 時間: 2025-3-22 03:23 作者: 上漲 時間: 2025-3-22 08:36
Tanjina SharminComprehensively discusses issues related to the scope of MFN clauses in IIAs.Analyses all publicly available arbitral decisions on the application of MFN clauses to substantive, procedural, and jurisd作者: 十字架 時間: 2025-3-22 10:15
International Law and the Global Southhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/159152.jpg作者: pancreas 時間: 2025-3-22 13:22
The Handbook of Environmental Chemistryhe beneficiary states, their nationals and entities, treatment no less favourable than that is accorded to any third state. There are divergent opinions about the scope of MFN clauses in IIAs and about the approaches for determining such scope. IIA MFN clauses are treaty-based obligations as opposed作者: decode 時間: 2025-3-22 17:20
Meritxell Gros,Mira Petrovic,Damià Barcelónterpreted mainly by their wording, or whether any guidance can be sought from the conceptual nature of the standard. Another purpose of this part is to provide a detailed understanding of the concept and evolution of MFN so as to inform its application in the context of IIAs. This chapter discusses作者: Itinerant 時間: 2025-3-22 23:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29376-9plied to evaluate arbitral decisions on their application in the subsequent chapters of this book. This chapter examines the applicability of the 1969 ., discusses the rules of interpretation and compares various interpretative approaches. It discusses some relevant provisions in the 1978 . prepared作者: 男生戴手銬 時間: 2025-3-23 05:11 作者: Ballad 時間: 2025-3-23 08:39
The (Over)Promise of Modern Technology,raise legal issues. In particular, must claimants follow them before they can arbitrate, or can they bypass them? While some arbitral tribunals have used MFN clauses to bypass various procedural prerequisites, others have rejected the same. Consequently, there is a split within arbitral decisions on作者: 鐵塔等 時間: 2025-3-23 09:59 作者: 斜谷 時間: 2025-3-23 15:23
Yoko Kijima,Yukinori Ito,Keijiro Otsukay space, especially, in reference to the MFN clauses. The chapter demonstrates how new generation IIAs signed by the developing countries have reformed MFN clauses. Three main trends are visible in this respect. First, excluding dispute settlement and procedural issues from MFN. Second, requiring a 作者: 名次后綴 時間: 2025-3-23 21:25 作者: 6Applepolish 時間: 2025-3-23 22:32
2510-1420 cation of MFN clauses to substantive, procedural, and jurisd.This book comprehensively examines various issues regarding the scope of Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) Clauses in International Investment Agreements (IIAs), and addresses the reform, interpretation, and enforcement of IIAs with a specific fo作者: Highbrow 時間: 2025-3-24 05:42 作者: 同音 時間: 2025-3-24 10:25
Evolution of MFN Treatment and Drafting Trends in the Older Generation of IIAs,nterpreted mainly by their wording, or whether any guidance can be sought from the conceptual nature of the standard. Another purpose of this part is to provide a detailed understanding of the concept and evolution of MFN so as to inform its application in the context of IIAs. This chapter discusses作者: Agility 時間: 2025-3-24 10:53
Principles of Interpretation,plied to evaluate arbitral decisions on their application in the subsequent chapters of this book. This chapter examines the applicability of the 1969 ., discusses the rules of interpretation and compares various interpretative approaches. It discusses some relevant provisions in the 1978 . prepared作者: Bph773 時間: 2025-3-24 18:54
Application of MFN to the Substantive Benefits, tribunals have, on several occasions, stated that MFN can apply to substantive benefits while some tribunals observed that substantive and procedural rights within IIAs are conventionally distinct. According to this, application of MFN should be confined to?the substantive benefits only. However, m作者: 世俗 時間: 2025-3-24 19:02 作者: Blanch 時間: 2025-3-25 02:09
Application of MFN to Extend the Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals,eir jurisdiction from the consent of states, and they are constituted by their mandate providers, the sovereign states. In this way, states subject themselves to a consensual system of investment dispute settlement by conferring power upon tribunals. Consequently, the lack of consent by a state mean作者: 時代 時間: 2025-3-25 04:28 作者: Femine 時間: 2025-3-25 08:48 作者: Osteoarthritis 時間: 2025-3-25 13:08 作者: Herbivorous 時間: 2025-3-25 18:35
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29376-9treaty. The?. requires application of MFN to remain subject to various boundaries. Therefore, MFN clauses should not be interpreted with any?preconceived idea or presumption, and MFN cannot necessarily bypass any IIA provision.作者: BARGE 時間: 2025-3-25 20:21
Emerging Contaminants in River Ecosystems not contain them at all; and whether MFN should import a better-drafted substantive benefit from another treaty when the basic treaty already contains the same kind of substantive benefit in less favourable terms. To explore the above issues, this chapter reviews 21 key arbitral decisions that allo作者: Myocyte 時間: 2025-3-26 00:09 作者: 抒情短詩 時間: 2025-3-26 07:51
Richard A. Bitzinger (Senior Fellow)ific persons (.), territorial (.), temporal (.) and subject matters (.). The chapter argues that MFN should not be applied to bypass consent of IIA party states conferring jurisdiction to the arbitral tribunals. The chapter also argues that extending jurisdiction by MFN can result in abuse of the ar作者: 暗諷 時間: 2025-3-26 12:22
Yoko Kijima,Yukinori Ito,Keijiro Otsukaircumstances have given a complex definition of ‘like circumstances’ which will be challenging for the future arbitral tribunals to interpret. Lastly, total omission of MFN by India in reaction to the . decision may give rise to further concerns for the investors in future. The tribunal in . applied作者: Flustered 時間: 2025-3-26 16:39
Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral TribunalsImplications for the作者: MERIT 時間: 2025-3-26 18:02 作者: instate 時間: 2025-3-27 00:18
Introduction,ses in IIAs is a matter of interpretation, it is possible to clarify their scope to a significant extent by an evaluation of existing jurisprudence on their application. Accordingly, the central thrust of this book is to draw out the proper scope of MFN clauses in IIAs by evaluating the existing jur作者: 極少 時間: 2025-3-27 03:22 作者: 綁架 時間: 2025-3-27 06:30 作者: Callus 時間: 2025-3-27 09:45
Application of MFN to the Substantive Benefits, not contain them at all; and whether MFN should import a better-drafted substantive benefit from another treaty when the basic treaty already contains the same kind of substantive benefit in less favourable terms. To explore the above issues, this chapter reviews 21 key arbitral decisions that allo作者: COWER 時間: 2025-3-27 13:48 作者: 深陷 時間: 2025-3-27 21:46 作者: Magnificent 時間: 2025-3-27 22:53
Conclusion,ircumstances have given a complex definition of ‘like circumstances’ which will be challenging for the future arbitral tribunals to interpret. Lastly, total omission of MFN by India in reaction to the . decision may give rise to further concerns for the investors in future. The tribunal in . applied作者: CAMEO 時間: 2025-3-28 05:41
2510-1420 gto do with the original intent of the parties. In making this argument, the book draws on Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other interpretative rules. What sets the book a978-981-15-3732-5978-981-15-3730-1Series ISSN 2510-1420 Series E-ISSN 2510-1439 作者: 動機 時間: 2025-3-28 08:48 作者: 說不出 時間: 2025-3-28 10:47
