標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason; Federico Zuolo Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 突然 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:01
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason年度引用
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 易受騙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3367-9eness. To strengthen the epistemic pedigree of the discussed views, the procedure includes two norms (formal epistemic norm and substantive epistemic norm) to establish which views are minimally rationally acceptable.作者: 使服水土 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:25 作者: 剝削 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:46 作者: 使困惑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:29 作者: anesthesia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:02 作者: Recess 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:06 作者: nautical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:17
The ‘Unconquerable Private Interests’g animals’ interests in life, in freedom and in welfare. The procedure of public justification yields a conclusive outcome only with regard to the principles protecting animals’ interests in welfare, while in the other two families we have inconclusive outcomes. In these cases, we have to employ majoritarian democratic procedures.作者: jarring 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:59 作者: Magisterial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:49
Introduction,so far neglected both in political philosophy and in animal ethics, despite the recent political turn in animal ethics. It concludes by clarifying the scope of the analysis (the domain of sentient beings) and by defending a sentience-based account of moral considerability.作者: infelicitous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:58
Views on the Moral Status of Animals, other socially widespread views (religions and societal attitudes) and shows what views (those incompatible with the findings of science and those that include incoherent attitudes toward animals) are to be excluded from public justification.作者: 制定 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:50
Applying Public Justification: Interests, Principles and Competing Reasons,g animals’ interests in life, in freedom and in welfare. The procedure of public justification yields a conclusive outcome only with regard to the principles protecting animals’ interests in welfare, while in the other two families we have inconclusive outcomes. In these cases, we have to employ majoritarian democratic procedures.作者: 本土 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:15 作者: chassis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:51 作者: dilute 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:27
rinciples acceptable to all. By setting out a unified framework which honours the liberal principles of respect for diversity, a robust liberal political theory capable of dealing with diverse forms of disagreement, and even some forms of radical dissent, is achieved..978-3-030-49511-4978-3-030-49509-1作者: 吃掉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:11 作者: 設(shè)施 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:33 作者: Free-Radical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:51
Animal Treatment as a Matter of Reasonable Disagreement,ssible in practice, two paradigmatic cases of peer disagreement are discussed: the first regarding the admissibility of the use of animals in research laboratories and the second regarding the problem of weighing animal suffering. The purchase of this idea is that our best available arguments and ev作者: botany 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:28 作者: arboretum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:47
Views on the Moral Status of Animals,thocentrism, Relationalism, Environmentalism and Humanism. The rest of the chapter explains why these views are sufficient to partially represent some other socially widespread views (religions and societal attitudes) and shows what views (those incompatible with the findings of science and those th作者: 某人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:33
Applying Public Justification: Interests, Principles and Competing Reasons, may be supported by neutral reasons and by reasons internal to the main views. These principles are divided into three families: principles protecting animals’ interests in life, in freedom and in welfare. The procedure of public justification yields a conclusive outcome only with regard to the pri作者: instulate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:21
Addressing Unlawfulness: Admissible and Non-admissible Forms of Protest, illegal acts. The response should be dependent on the type of claim put forward by the unreasonable parties and their attitude. By analyzing a range of cases, including cases of civil disobedience and direct actions for the sake of freeing animals, this chapter argues that acts of civil disobedienc作者: Rejuvenate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:43 作者: micronutrients 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:57
http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/157737.jpg作者: voluble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:33 作者: Medicaid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:28 作者: FOR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:39 作者: largesse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:51
Money Demand Analysis in Mauritiusssible in practice, two paradigmatic cases of peer disagreement are discussed: the first regarding the admissibility of the use of animals in research laboratories and the second regarding the problem of weighing animal suffering. The purchase of this idea is that our best available arguments and ev作者: Detonate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:17 作者: EVEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:13 作者: objection 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:44 作者: kindred 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:39 作者: Pelvic-Floor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:13 作者: florid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:08
Conclusion,The conclusion briefly discusses the possible application of this procedure to some thorny topics (the issue of hunting and genetic engineering) and provides some considerations on whether real, and not merely hypothetical, people may uphold and accept the spirit and implications of this procedure.作者: Ophthalmologist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:40
results were analyzed using the ANOVA process. We found that culture in Thailand influences ideas of waiting differently in different first- and third-person point of view (POV) settings. The participants in the first-person POV group show a tendency to focus on the concept of fairness more than th作者: Exclaim 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:48
Betriebsweise und Betriebskosten,des Vierecks A, B, C, D das Trapez A, E, F, D tr?te. Eine Fahrt nach A, B, C, D ist wirtschaftlicher als eine Fahrt nach A, E, F, D, weil im ersten Fall nur die der Strecke C, D entsprechende, im zweiten Fall aber die der Strecke F, D entsprechende Energie durch Bremsen vernichtet wird.作者: CLAY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:35 作者: epidermis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:35 作者: folliculitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:07
2197-6708 ogische Grundlagen über Normkonformit?t k?nnen Compliance-Manager und -Kommunikatoren in ihrer Arbeit unterstützen. Auf die Frage ?Keine Regel ohne Ausnahme?“ finden Compliance-Manager hier Antworten aus Sicht der Wirtschaftspsychologie..978-3-658-19809-1978-3-658-19810-7Series ISSN 2197-6708 Series E-ISSN 2197-6716
