標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Animals, Ethics, and Language; The Philosophy of Me Rebekah Humphreys Book 2023 The Editor(s)(if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu [打印本頁] 作者: HABIT 時間: 2025-3-21 18:14
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language被引頻次
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language年度引用
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language讀者反饋
書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 慢慢流出 時間: 2025-3-21 22:40 作者: calamity 時間: 2025-3-22 00:55
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberseen to be based on this view in part or have some their roots in this view are archaic and morally backward-looking. It is worth noting that factory farming, by its very nature, treats animals as machines. Fortunately, discussions surrounding animal mentality and anthropomorphism are not only subje作者: 忘川河 時間: 2025-3-22 08:13 作者: mediocrity 時間: 2025-3-22 11:54
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberhat can be adopted to elucidate correct anthropomorphic practices. Animals’ ‘mindedness’ can be ‘seen’, for it is embodied in their expressions, movements, and behaviours. But what of incorrect anthropomorphic practices? What can be said of these? Acceptance of the plausibility of critical anthropom作者: 太空 時間: 2025-3-22 13:29
Production, Income, and Economic Growthntold suffering upon animals for even trivial purposes. That such suffering is the norm is in many ways unbelievable (but sadly all too true) in the light of the fact that many people would consider such a belief to be archaic. However, despite this, there remains a deep anxiety—in philosophy, scien作者: characteristic 時間: 2025-3-22 19:17 作者: 咒語 時間: 2025-3-23 00:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32080-4Critical Animal Studies; posthumanism; animal ethics; animal cognition; Anthropomorphism作者: ARK 時間: 2025-3-23 04:15 作者: 持續(xù) 時間: 2025-3-23 06:58
Rebekah HumphreysApplies the findings of cognitive ethology to animal ethics.Synthesizes the work of critical animal theorists, philosophers, and cognitive ethologists.Explores how the debates concerning anthropomorph作者: 青春期 時間: 2025-3-23 11:01 作者: 使熄滅 時間: 2025-3-23 17:45
Animals, Ethics, and Language978-3-031-32080-4Series ISSN 2634-6672 Series E-ISSN 2634-6680 作者: 和平主義 時間: 2025-3-23 19:46 作者: 弄皺 時間: 2025-3-23 22:44
Going Home: Returning from Posthumanism via a Defence of Identity as Continuity,es) the endorsement of which conveys the belief that animals lack minds. However, because at least many animals are beings that are phenomenally conscious creatures, talking about animals and their behaviour in terms of, for example, ‘responses to stimuli’ is far from a true depiction of animals.作者: 信徒 時間: 2025-3-24 04:48 作者: OGLE 時間: 2025-3-24 07:55
Production, Income, and Economic Growthes) the endorsement of which conveys the belief that animals lack minds. However, because at least many animals are beings that are phenomenally conscious creatures, talking about animals and their behaviour in terms of, for example, ‘responses to stimuli’ is far from a true depiction of animals.作者: CLAY 時間: 2025-3-24 14:31 作者: Immunization 時間: 2025-3-24 17:30 作者: Rinne-Test 時間: 2025-3-24 21:38
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberfarming, by its very nature, treats animals as machines. Fortunately, discussions surrounding animal mentality and anthropomorphism are not only subject to a Cartesian legacy; they are also heir to Darwinism. As de Waal explains,作者: forager 時間: 2025-3-25 01:49
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberents, and behaviours. But what of incorrect anthropomorphic practices? What can be said of these? Acceptance of the plausibility of critical anthropomorphism is not to say that all so-called anthropomorphic attributes are justifiable or appropriate.作者: certain 時間: 2025-3-25 06:53
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilbere possibility and acquisition of knowledge of such consciousness will be reinterpreted and found to be problems concerning something of quite a different nature, that is, problems concerning language and the description of animal mentality.作者: ALERT 時間: 2025-3-25 10:19 作者: vocation 時間: 2025-3-25 14:08 作者: 帽子 時間: 2025-3-25 16:22 作者: initiate 時間: 2025-3-25 22:25 作者: decode 時間: 2025-3-26 03:50 作者: ALLEY 時間: 2025-3-26 04:48
Anthropomorphous Animals and Philosophy,oblems, including the fact that such studies are limited in their ability to provide a picture of a phenomenological world that is truly representative of the lived experiences of nonhumans and of their amazing capacities (some of which are different from—and some of which are like—the abilities of human beings).作者: FUME 時間: 2025-3-26 09:52
Book 2023sectionality in relation to animal ethics been more important. In particular, the arguments related to anthropomorphic attributes of mentality to other than humans promise to provide fruitful new ground for re-assessing human-animal relations. This book maps the central debates surrounding anthropom作者: Water-Brash 時間: 2025-3-26 13:48
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberural sciences constitute the world based on presuppositions that it assumes are value-neutral and transparent, but that (in relation to some of these presuppositions with regard to animals) distort ‘reality’.作者: 同音 時間: 2025-3-26 20:10
Critical Anthropomorphism,ural sciences constitute the world based on presuppositions that it assumes are value-neutral and transparent, but that (in relation to some of these presuppositions with regard to animals) distort ‘reality’.作者: 情感 時間: 2025-3-26 22:23
Introduction: Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics,ality, and meaningful communication in the nonhuman world (see Chaps. ., ., and .). These debates have been, in the history of ideas, mostly associated with philosophers and thinkers such as Hume, Montaigne, and Darwin, but can be traced back to the work of pre-Socratic philosophers (see Chap. .). T作者: 令人心醉 時間: 2025-3-27 03:49
Anthropomorphous Animals and Philosophy,er species of mind problem’—is a more intractable problem for the philosopher than that of the knowledge of other human minds because animals cannot tell us through speech about their experiences. Of course, from the very fact that nonhumans cannot do this, it does not follow that they cannot have e作者: 吵鬧 時間: 2025-3-27 08:07
Moral Standing and Human Exceptionalism,seen to be based on this view in part or have some their roots in this view are archaic and morally backward-looking. It is worth noting that factory farming, by its very nature, treats animals as machines. Fortunately, discussions surrounding animal mentality and anthropomorphism are not only subje作者: 禁令 時間: 2025-3-27 12:02 作者: 睨視 時間: 2025-3-27 17:24 作者: 神圣在玷污 時間: 2025-3-27 19:09
Going Home: Returning from Posthumanism via a Defence of Identity as Continuity,ntold suffering upon animals for even trivial purposes. That such suffering is the norm is in many ways unbelievable (but sadly all too true) in the light of the fact that many people would consider such a belief to be archaic. However, despite this, there remains a deep anxiety—in philosophy, scien作者: 一罵死割除 時間: 2025-3-27 23:40
The Application of Key Concepts,ncepts, and the role of the body in relation to animal mentality. Further, in this concluding chapter, problems concerning animal consciousness and the possibility and acquisition of knowledge of such consciousness will be reinterpreted and found to be problems concerning something of quite a differ作者: 細(xì)菌等 時間: 2025-3-28 02:40
10樓作者: 觀察 時間: 2025-3-28 07:40
10樓作者: magenta 時間: 2025-3-28 13:21
10樓作者: Focus-Words 時間: 2025-3-28 16:59
10樓
