標題: Titlebook: An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics; Part II: Vaulted Str Edoardo Benvenuto Book 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991 [打印本頁] 作者: 猛烈抨擊 時間: 2025-3-21 17:47
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics被引頻次
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics年度引用
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics年度引用學科排名
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics讀者反饋
書目名稱An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics讀者反饋學科排名
作者: 古老 時間: 2025-3-21 22:30
cts distrusted them, partly because they often disregarded details of importance in actual construction, partly because nobody but a mathematician could understand the aim and func- tion of a mathematical theory designed to represent an aspect of nature. This book is the first to show how statics, strength of978-1-4612-7751-4978-1-4612-2994-0作者: 使閉塞 時間: 2025-3-22 03:42 作者: 彩色的蠟筆 時間: 2025-3-22 05:29
An Introduction to the History of Structural MechanicsPart II: Vaulted Str作者: Pamphlet 時間: 2025-3-22 11:42
An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics978-1-4612-2994-0作者: 固執(zhí)點好 時間: 2025-3-22 16:12 作者: 不來 時間: 2025-3-22 18:18 作者: 首創(chuàng)精神 時間: 2025-3-22 22:16
Architectonic Debatesf domes and vaults. Why, then, should anyone question experience? The old models were graceful, harmonic, based on proportions which combined beauty and strength. Everyone firmly believed that the arch was the most stable of architectural figures; what needed refinement were the technical methods—sc作者: lymphoma 時間: 2025-3-23 04:28
Later Researchn scientists who sometimes seem to be toying with it, using it to show off their mathematical erudition. It is difficult to make one’s way through the tangle of formalism, tortuous reasoning, and elegant demonstrations to the underlying hypotheses—some of them most significant—of writers like Bossut作者: choleretic 時間: 2025-3-23 07:47 作者: heterogeneous 時間: 2025-3-23 12:11 作者: superfluous 時間: 2025-3-23 15:36
The Discovery of General Methods for the Calculation of Elastic Systemsation of the question, an event which opened up fresh objectives and a broader view of the matter. Now we find ourselves investigating elastic systems more generally, including any sort of structure used in civil engineering. If we replace “elastic system” with “frame,” the applications become obvio作者: 責問 時間: 2025-3-23 20:26 作者: anniversary 時間: 2025-3-23 22:58 作者: 完全 時間: 2025-3-24 05:38 作者: fatty-acids 時間: 2025-3-24 10:35
Later Research, Mascheroni or Salimbeni. These authors pay only superficial attention to the possible applications of their results. Instead they favor a spectacular analytical elaboration which rejoins the subject of arches and domes to the theme of flexible curves through a rather narrow analogy between their corresponding differential equations.作者: Charlatan 時間: 2025-3-24 12:50 作者: Calibrate 時間: 2025-3-24 16:26
Die diachronische Entwicklung der DOM,passion for research, in which the loftiest intentions coexisted with thoroughly human and personal ambition. The dispute about solids of equal resistance proved easy to resolve, once its terms were clarified; each faction possessed a part of the truth. But the question of elastic systems was a far thornier matter.作者: visual-cortex 時間: 2025-3-24 21:24
The Eighteenth-century Debate on the Supports Problempassion for research, in which the loftiest intentions coexisted with thoroughly human and personal ambition. The dispute about solids of equal resistance proved easy to resolve, once its terms were clarified; each faction possessed a part of the truth. But the question of elastic systems was a far thornier matter.作者: Genome 時間: 2025-3-25 00:02
s and master masons, long before there were mathematical theories, erected structures of astonishing originality, strength, and beauty. Many of these still stand. Were it not for our now acid atmosphere, we could expect them to stand for centuries more. We admire early architects‘ visible success in作者: 小教堂 時間: 2025-3-25 07:05 作者: 背叛者 時間: 2025-3-25 10:53
The Discovery of General Methods for the Calculation of Elastic Systems more generally, including any sort of structure used in civil engineering. If we replace “elastic system” with “frame,” the applications become obvious—and we can make this substitution. Or we can define “frame” in a more abstract way; as J. Clerk Maxwell put it, “a frame is a system of lines connecting a number of points.”.作者: giggle 時間: 2025-3-25 12:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03141-9affolding and centers which would simplify the masons’ work, improved drafting to eliminate errors in perimeters and profiles. Why should anyone suggest new rules for the dimensions of such structures, perfected as they had been by a secular tradition?作者: FLIC 時間: 2025-3-25 18:11 作者: PAEAN 時間: 2025-3-25 21:12 作者: ornithology 時間: 2025-3-26 00:17
Alphabet der Schriftstellerinnen, can call the first one “the problem of the egg”: how can an apparently fragile curve support heavy loads? What curve is the strongest? What is the best curve for a given practical application? The second, we can call “the problem of the wall”: what are the best dimensions for a pair of abutments?作者: 不可磨滅 時間: 2025-3-26 08:19 作者: dearth 時間: 2025-3-26 11:48
First Theories about the Statics of Arches and Domes can call the first one “the problem of the egg”: how can an apparently fragile curve support heavy loads? What curve is the strongest? What is the best curve for a given practical application? The second, we can call “the problem of the wall”: what are the best dimensions for a pair of abutments?作者: Narrative 時間: 2025-3-26 14:20
Alphabet der Schriftstellerinnen, can call the first one “the problem of the egg”: how can an apparently fragile curve support heavy loads? What curve is the strongest? What is the best curve for a given practical application? The second, we can call “the problem of the wall”: what are the best dimensions for a pair of abutments?作者: 興奮過度 時間: 2025-3-26 19:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03141-9f domes and vaults. Why, then, should anyone question experience? The old models were graceful, harmonic, based on proportions which combined beauty and strength. Everyone firmly believed that the arch was the most stable of architectural figures; what needed refinement were the technical methods—sc作者: 歡樂東方 時間: 2025-3-27 00:48
Die dezentrale Hauptversammlungn scientists who sometimes seem to be toying with it, using it to show off their mathematical erudition. It is difficult to make one’s way through the tangle of formalism, tortuous reasoning, and elegant demonstrations to the underlying hypotheses—some of them most significant—of writers like Bossut作者: 耕種 時間: 2025-3-27 02:51
Die diachronische Entwicklung der DOM,ifferent scientific and cultural viewpoints, disputes and diatribes. In the end, the solution to the problem appeared simultaneously in several places, as though it had been there all the time, just waiting to be caught. As Todhunter and Pearson note,. the history of the theory of elastic systems be作者: adipose-tissue 時間: 2025-3-27 06:59
Die diachronische Entwicklung der DOM,ses of statics which inaugurate the new century. For example, Poinsot, in his . (1803) interprets the static indeterminacy of the problem of supports as a necessary consequence of his concept of rigid bodies: “We should then guard ourselves from the conclusion that the theory known up to now is insu作者: 膝蓋 時間: 2025-3-27 13:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04613-4ation of the question, an event which opened up fresh objectives and a broader view of the matter. Now we find ourselves investigating elastic systems more generally, including any sort of structure used in civil engineering. If we replace “elastic system” with “frame,” the applications become obvio作者: Pericarditis 時間: 2025-3-27 16:22 作者: 遠足 時間: 2025-3-27 19:25 作者: 營養(yǎng) 時間: 2025-3-28 01:38 作者: muffler 時間: 2025-3-28 06:01 作者: 善辯 時間: 2025-3-28 08:11 作者: bypass 時間: 2025-3-28 11:44
9樓作者: 注入 時間: 2025-3-28 17:13
9樓作者: 確定 時間: 2025-3-28 19:24
9樓作者: 帳單 時間: 2025-3-29 00:45
10樓作者: 赤字 時間: 2025-3-29 04:13
10樓作者: 芳香一點 時間: 2025-3-29 09:57
10樓作者: 百靈鳥 時間: 2025-3-29 13:54
10樓
