派博傳思國際中心

標(biāo)題: Titlebook: An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics; A Reflection on Abor Motsamai Molefe Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author( [打印本頁]

作者: HIV763 時間: 2025-3-21 19:11
書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics影響因子(影響力)

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics被引頻次

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics被引頻次學(xué)科排名

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics年度引用

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics年度引用學(xué)科排名

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics讀者反饋

書目名稱An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

作者: flaggy 時間: 2025-3-21 20:39

作者: 切碎 時間: 2025-3-22 01:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6477-7 the normative idea of personhood in African philosophy and the universal concept of dignity. He aims to offer a personhood-based conception of dignity and then apply it to select bioethical themes. The introduction is divided into three sections. The first section deals with the concepts of personh

作者: 奴才 時間: 2025-3-22 07:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6477-7agent-centred and patient-centred theories of value. In the first part of the chapter, he discusses the agent-centred theory of value. He accounts for it in terms of moral perfection, where the chief moral goal of the agent is to perfect her own humanity. He further unfolds the moral egoism, moral i

作者: minion 時間: 2025-3-22 09:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12045-2 is whether the idea of personhood would permit or forbid abortion. He ultimately defends the view that forbids abortion. To secure this conclusion, he structures the chapter as follows. He begins with questions of methodology. He first proposes what he takes to be a suitable method to engage on the

作者: 魔鬼在游行 時間: 2025-3-22 13:51

作者: Accrue 時間: 2025-3-22 20:28
Motsamai MolefeContributes to the emerging field of African bioethics.Articulates a personhood-based theory of dignity.Applies this theory to select bioethical issues: abortion and euthanasia

作者: seduce 時間: 2025-3-22 22:14

作者: white-matter 時間: 2025-3-23 01:55

作者: stratum-corneum 時間: 2025-3-23 07:48
Personhood, Morality and Dignity in African Philosophy,agent-centred and patient-centred theories of value. In the first part of the chapter, he discusses the agent-centred theory of value. He accounts for it in terms of moral perfection, where the chief moral goal of the agent is to perfect her own humanity. He further unfolds the moral egoism, moral i

作者: 披肩 時間: 2025-3-23 11:22
Personhood and Abortion in African Philosophy, is whether the idea of personhood would permit or forbid abortion. He ultimately defends the view that forbids abortion. To secure this conclusion, he structures the chapter as follows. He begins with questions of methodology. He first proposes what he takes to be a suitable method to engage on the

作者: Certainty 時間: 2025-3-23 16:06
Personhood and Euthanasia in African Philosophy,chapter as follows. In the first section, he begins by defining crucial terms and proceeds to contextualise the discussion in light of the South African legal literature on the question of euthanasia. In the second section, Molefe propounds an account of a good death in the light of personhood by co

作者: 難管 時間: 2025-3-23 19:35
Personhood and Abortion in African Philosophy,ers arguments that neutralise Horsthemke’s arguments by proposing a more plausible interpretation of Menkiti’s moral philosophy that accommodates the young in the moral community, among others. Finally, Molefe considers two possible objections against his view.

作者: BYRE 時間: 2025-3-24 00:27
that it is permissible for reasons revolving around avoiding the reversing of personhood. It also, though, minimally, touches on the questions regarding the mentally disabled and animals, to which it assigns lower moral status..978-3-030-46521-6978-3-030-46519-3

作者: 歌劇等 時間: 2025-3-24 05:36

作者: 修改 時間: 2025-3-24 07:33
Book 2020it concludes that it is impermissible since foetuses possess partial moral status. Regarding euthanasia, it argues that it is permissible for reasons revolving around avoiding the reversing of personhood. It also, though, minimally, touches on the questions regarding the mentally disabled and animals, to which it assigns lower moral status..

作者: 手勢 時間: 2025-3-24 12:51

作者: 新手 時間: 2025-3-24 14:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6477-7ood in African philosophy and it further explores their relation to the idea of moral status or dignity. The second section considers the literature related to the bioethical themes of abortion and euthanasia since these will be the focus of the book. Finally, it discusses the structure of the book.

作者: Repetitions 時間: 2025-3-24 19:51

作者: jovial 時間: 2025-3-25 00:47

作者: LINES 時間: 2025-3-25 04:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6477-7acet of value—moral status or dignity. He begins by repudiating Polycarp Ikuenobe’s personhood-based view of dignity. Molefe proceeds to derive and construct a personhood-based account of dignity in the works of Ifeanyi Menkiti and Kwame Gyekye. Ultimately, he accounts for dignity in terms of the capacity for sympathy.

作者: CHAFE 時間: 2025-3-25 10:27