作者: 責(zé)任 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:45 作者: 一個(gè)攪動(dòng)不安 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:06
of Jeffersonian and Jacksonian opinion in both the Congress, and the public at large, and his recognition of the United States’ global interests. That the shape of FDR’s ultimate vision for the post-1945 world blended the key assumptions and insights of the two extroverted political cultures of stat作者: 預(yù)定 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:34
gy adjustment during the Cold War. These debates were from 1945 onward ultimately about the means and not the ends of American grand strategy and demonstrated the manner in which the political cultures of statecraft acted as permissive filters to make certain strategic choices more likely than other作者: 堅(jiān)毅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:17 作者: Suggestions 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:13
bal inequality as key drivers of international politics. Ronald Reagan’s approach to American grand strategy, in turn, was a reaction to the perceived errors of détente and the failure of the Carter administration to harness its quest for a moral foreign policy to the pursuit of American strategic a作者: 懸掛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:29 作者: 完成才會(huì)征服 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:36 作者: 短程旅游 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:15
Power, Ideas, and Choice: Explaining Change in American Grand Strategy,s. I define these political cultures of statecraft following Walter Russell Mead’s typology of Hamiltonian, Wilsonian, Jeffersonian, and Jacksonian and argue that each presents a “historical repertoire” that provides multiple narratives for leaders or strategists to draw upon to guide particular gra作者: Facilities 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:31
Primacy Unrequited: American Grand Strategy Under Wilson,ot be based on an alliance of some states against others but rather on American leadership of a “universal cooperative” effort to preserve order. Wilson’s solution to insecurity of international politics was thus distinctly primacist in nature as it sought to overcome the “evils” of traditional grea作者: 否認(rèn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:46
,Primacy in Sight: FDR and the Transition from Neutrality to a “New Deal” for the World,of Jeffersonian and Jacksonian opinion in both the Congress, and the public at large, and his recognition of the United States’ global interests. That the shape of FDR’s ultimate vision for the post-1945 world blended the key assumptions and insights of the two extroverted political cultures of stat作者: fluoroscopy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:38
Primacy in the Pursuit of National Security: American Grand Strategy from Truman to Johnson,gy adjustment during the Cold War. These debates were from 1945 onward ultimately about the means and not the ends of American grand strategy and demonstrated the manner in which the political cultures of statecraft acted as permissive filters to make certain strategic choices more likely than other作者: CLOWN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:58
,Primacy in Peril: American Grand Strategy Under Détente, geopolitically and militarily and establishing a new equilibrium that protected the country’s international position. As such it shared much with George F. Kennan’s original formulation of “containment” through its preeminent focus on US–Soviet relations, a “strong point” defence of American intere作者: corporate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:56
,Primacy in Superpower Confrontation: From Détente to “Peace Through Strength”,bal inequality as key drivers of international politics. Ronald Reagan’s approach to American grand strategy, in turn, was a reaction to the perceived errors of détente and the failure of the Carter administration to harness its quest for a moral foreign policy to the pursuit of American strategic a作者: 多嘴 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:47
,Primacy in the Service of (Inter)national Security: The Promises and Pitfalls of the “Unipolar Momes an congenial to our interests”.?While the events of 9/11 served to intensify the George W. Bush administration’s pursuit of primacy, the precise shape of that strategy was clearly informed by an aspect of domestic political culture: the influence of the Wilsonian and Jacksonian political cultures 作者: 性別 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:36 作者: overrule 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:47 作者: 持久 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:57 作者: Collision 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:00
rican national security. The chapter then concludes by providing a synthesis of the book’s major arguments and explores a number of potential lessons for the future of American grand strategy drawn from the “l(fā)ong view” of its development and evolution undertaken in the book’s preceding chapters.作者: 驚惶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:23 作者: 無能性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:26 作者: Coronary-Spasm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:13 作者: gene-therapy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:58
cs beyond the Western hemisphere. By the first decade of the twentieth century the ascent of such vindicationism embedded the notion in elite discourse that American prosperity and national security . that it be actively engaged in core regions of the globe.作者: forebear 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:16
,Priming for Primacy: Building an “Empire of Principles” in the Progressive Era,cs beyond the Western hemisphere. By the first decade of the twentieth century the ascent of such vindicationism embedded the notion in elite discourse that American prosperity and national security . that it be actively engaged in core regions of the globe.作者: MORT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:55 作者: Culmination 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:30 作者: 詞匯 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:35
National Security and American Grand Strategy,Since President Barack Obama’s reelection in 2012, there has been a growing perception in the United States and abroad that American primacy in the international system is under threat from multiple fronts.作者: 思考才皺眉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:32 作者: 有發(fā)明天才 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:53
nation of the interaction between systemic change and American political culture from the Founding of the Republic to the Polk administration (1844–1849). In particular, this chapter highlights the early dominance of “exemplarist” traditions of statecraft (particularly those associated with Washingt作者: 強(qiáng)行引入 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:41 作者: Bravado 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:48
lity of morality and principles; belief in the capacity and right of people to self-government; and belief in the unique mission of the United States to promote liberty at home and abroad—onto those of the preceding era of “progressive imperialism”. Understood in this context, Wilson’s “crusade” to 作者: 享樂主義者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:17
a broader argument about how the United States could maintain and extend its power in a fundamentally altered world. This period constituted a transitional one in which political leaders, intellectuals, and public opinion attempted to navigate between honoring long-established principles of statecr作者: NATAL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:07 作者: judicial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:34
lay and tension between the “exemplarist” and “vindicationist” faces of American power. It argues that systemic pressure posed by the threat of Soviet expansion on the Eurasian continent combined with the domestic politics of anti-statism and liberal political culture to forge the grand strategic sy作者: hypnotic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:27 作者: 起皺紋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:38
at Carter mounted a Jeffersonian critique of détente, and of containment more broadly, by arguing that the means of grand strategy had in fact corrupted its ends whereby the “inordinate fear of communism” had encouraged the United States to forgo its principles to support unsavoury but “anti-communi作者: animated 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:31
It notes that the end of the Cold War presented the United States with a grand strategic dilemma: would it use this opportunity to achieve, in Walter Lippman’s phrase, a “solvent” grand strategy that brought into balance “the nation’s commitments and the nation’s power” or would it seek to embed its作者: Cupidity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:39 作者: 小爭吵 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:52
eign policy as it is the first time since the 1940s that the nation has elevated to the White House someone who so overtly questioned the central tenets of the “vindicationist” face of American power. The chapter argues that Trump’s “America First” foreign policy channels contradictory “exemplarist”作者: 蝕刻術(shù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:34
Power, Ideas, and Choice: Explaining Change in American Grand Strategy,ent and change over time than purely structural theories of grand strategy. In contrast to structural realist frameworks that emphasize the primacy of the structure and architecture of the international system in determining state behavior, neoclassical realists define their research agendas by dist作者: 手術(shù)刀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:44
,Before Primacy: American Grand Strategy from the Founding to “Manifest Destiny”,nation of the interaction between systemic change and American political culture from the Founding of the Republic to the Polk administration (1844–1849). In particular, this chapter highlights the early dominance of “exemplarist” traditions of statecraft (particularly those associated with Washingt作者: Legend 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:44 作者: 賭博 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:57
Primacy Unrequited: American Grand Strategy Under Wilson,lity of morality and principles; belief in the capacity and right of people to self-government; and belief in the unique mission of the United States to promote liberty at home and abroad—onto those of the preceding era of “progressive imperialism”. Understood in this context, Wilson’s “crusade” to 作者: 遷移 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:13 作者: Deduct 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:26
