標題: Titlebook: Alvin Plantinga; James E. Tomberlin,Peter Inwagen Book 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985 discourse.epistemology.freedom.knowledge.phi [打印本頁] 作者: otitis-externa 時間: 2025-3-21 17:29
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga被引頻次
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga年度引用
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga讀者反饋
書目名稱Alvin Plantinga讀者反饋學科排名
作者: Immunization 時間: 2025-3-21 21:04 作者: Transfusion 時間: 2025-3-22 02:21 作者: Confirm 時間: 2025-3-22 06:52 作者: 陶醉 時間: 2025-3-22 11:10
Plantinga’s Epistemology of Religious Belieflief. I shall be concentrating on this recent attempt to do so. The essays in question are ‘Is Belief in God Rational?’ [4],. ‘The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology’ [5], and ‘Is Belief in God Properly Basic?’ [6].作者: tooth-decay 時間: 2025-3-22 15:37
Was ist Auβenpolitik und wer macht sie?ans are half-seriously reputed to be unduly stubborn: there is a Dutch expression “Friese Stijfkop” which means (literally) “Frisian Stiff- head”. In this respect, the Frisans may resemble the Ancicnt Jews, who are frequently referred to in the Old Testament as “a stubborn and stiff-necked people”. 作者: acetylcholine 時間: 2025-3-22 20:19
“Drüben?-Die andere deutsche Auβenpolitikquite mysterious and of questionable utility in the clarification of other concepts. Plantinga has been one of the principal figures involved in the attempt to clarify and understand the metaphysics of possible worlds. His book. ., together with a series of subsequent articles, constitutes what is p作者: Gesture 時間: 2025-3-22 23:29 作者: 詩集 時間: 2025-3-23 02:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5223-2discourse; epistemology; freedom; knowledge; philosophy作者: Neuropeptides 時間: 2025-3-23 08:01
978-90-277-2106-8D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985作者: integrated 時間: 2025-3-23 10:33 作者: 改變 時間: 2025-3-23 17:38 作者: 嬰兒 時間: 2025-3-23 21:13 作者: 混雜人 時間: 2025-3-24 00:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91070-3. two principles about proper names:作者: CORE 時間: 2025-3-24 03:46 作者: Criteria 時間: 2025-3-24 08:13 作者: MOAN 時間: 2025-3-24 10:44 作者: nutrition 時間: 2025-3-24 15:57
Plantinga’s Theory of Proper Names. two principles about proper names:作者: 悲痛 時間: 2025-3-24 19:11 作者: Heart-Attack 時間: 2025-3-24 23:24
Was ist Au?enpolitik und wer macht sie?rked by an intriguing turn — in . [12] he examines a number of variants of the argument and concludes that they arc one and all unsuccessful; but in his more recent . [13] and . [14], Plantinga offers what he takes to be a sound ontological argument. In what follows, I shall survey and evaluate Plantinga on these matters.作者: 果仁 時間: 2025-3-25 04:46 作者: 召集 時間: 2025-3-25 09:58
Was ist Auβenpolitik und wer macht sie?inga (neé Bossenbrock), was born near Alto, Wisconsin. On her mother’s side her family had come to the US about the time of the Civil War; her father’s family came some twenty years later. Both groups came from the villages of Elspeet and Nunspeet in the province of Gelderland, the Netherlands, then作者: Aspirin 時間: 2025-3-25 13:35
“Drüben?-Die andere deutsche Auβenpolitiktruth in all possible worlds. Possible worlds are also employed in the analysis of counterfactual conditions and law statements, in probability theory, in providing a foundation for modal and intensional logics, and so forth. But it is not entirely clear just what possible worlds arc supposed to be,作者: calumniate 時間: 2025-3-25 16:05 作者: 翻布尋找 時間: 2025-3-25 22:39 作者: 去掉 時間: 2025-3-26 03:03 作者: Chagrin 時間: 2025-3-26 06:54 作者: 憂傷 時間: 2025-3-26 09:22
Schluss: Nomalit?t ja, aber welche? his treatment of arguments for the existence of God or of the problem of evil. No doubt, his discussion of these matters can be seen as contributing to the development of an epistemology of religious belief. Thus the final upshot of .. is that sincc the topological argument, the best argument for t作者: 流行 時間: 2025-3-26 14:52 作者: 高興一回 時間: 2025-3-26 16:57 作者: 豪華 時間: 2025-3-26 21:08
Plantinga on the Problem of Evil show that theists need not accept certain burdens of proof — although I think theists have reason to attempt a more extensive response to the problem of evil than Plantinga seems to see a use for. This is indeed my principal disagreement with him on this subject, as will appear in section III, below.作者: 彈藥 時間: 2025-3-27 01:20 作者: 起皺紋 時間: 2025-3-27 09:15
Souver?nit?t und Selbsteinbindung show that theists need not accept certain burdens of proof — although I think theists have reason to attempt a more extensive response to the problem of evil than Plantinga seems to see a use for. This is indeed my principal disagreement with him on this subject, as will appear in section III, below.作者: surrogate 時間: 2025-3-27 09:28 作者: Rustproof 時間: 2025-3-27 15:00
?Drüben“ — Die andere deutsche Au?enpolitiktain version of the doctrine of divine foreknowledge with the claim that some human actions are voluntary. In the first section of this paper, I shall outline Pike’s argument; in the second section. I shall present a detailed exposition of Plantinga’s criticism of it.作者: SCORE 時間: 2025-3-27 18:16 作者: 禍害隱伏 時間: 2025-3-27 23:04 作者: Melanocytes 時間: 2025-3-28 03:20 作者: 白楊 時間: 2025-3-28 08:34
Plantinga and the Philosophy of MindAre minds material things? To (1) he has devoted three chapters of [15] and four papers ([12], [13], [14], and [16]); he maintains that the best answer we have is what he calls the “analogical position” (but he is none too happy with it). To (2) he has given three pages of [17], reprinting these wit作者: HEED 時間: 2025-3-28 12:14 作者: Pert敏捷 時間: 2025-3-28 15:02
Plantinga and the Ontological Argumentrked by an intriguing turn — in . [12] he examines a number of variants of the argument and concludes that they arc one and all unsuccessful; but in his more recent . [13] and . [14], Plantinga offers what he takes to be a sound ontological argument. In what follows, I shall survey and evaluate Plan作者: 蠟燭 時間: 2025-3-28 22:04
Plantinga on Foreknowledge and freedombulk of Plantinga’s discussion is an attempt to show the unsoundness of an argument constructed by Nelson Pike to establish the inconsistency of a certain version of the doctrine of divine foreknowledge with the claim that some human actions are voluntary. In the first section of this paper, I shall作者: B-cell 時間: 2025-3-29 01:42
Plantinga’s Epistemology of Religious Belief his treatment of arguments for the existence of God or of the problem of evil. No doubt, his discussion of these matters can be seen as contributing to the development of an epistemology of religious belief. Thus the final upshot of .. is that sincc the topological argument, the best argument for t
