標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions; Dinah Wouters Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho [打印本頁] 作者: 輕佻 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:51
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions被引頻次
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions年度引用
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions讀者反饋
書目名稱Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Anonymous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:51
Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions作者: 泥沼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17192-5allegory; middle ages; Hildegard; Bingen; Vision Books; medieval women; biblical studies; religious writing作者: Annotate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:10
978-3-031-17194-9The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: 套索 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:44 作者: chalice 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:16
Matt Chiu,Arlindo Silva,Siska Limough a discussion of her roles as visionary, prophet, and author. The introduction further argues that the study of twelfth-century allegory has been skewed towards Chartrian allegory and the idea of allegorical hermeneutics as a literary theory. The goal of this book is to study Hildegard’s systema作者: 薄膜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:18 作者: 宣稱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:40
Kristin A. Bartlett,Jorge D. Cambalegory and allegoresis. The outlines of their literary forms have been obscured by prejudices about their cultural values. The chapter identifies these prejudices and offers an alternative view of the relation between allegory and allegoresis. The second theoretical entanglement is that between form作者: 愛哭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:55
Design Computing and Cognition’22 suggest that the same formal mechanisms are at work in the allegorical and the exegetical text. Hildegard’s method resembles glossing, but goes beyond the individual gloss in creating a continuous narrative on the level of the sentence, of the single interpretation, and of a series of interpretatio作者: 盡忠 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08047-1and point out a formal difference between parables in the books of visions and in the letters. Second, I look at the special case of the allegorical description of the cosmos. A formal change takes place between similar descriptions in the first and the last book of visions, . and ., which I attribu作者: Intruder 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:29 作者: 破裂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08047-1y the individual. It demonstrates that the visionary’s ideas on allegory, language, and cognition are also central to how she theorises prophecy and visions. Lastly, it suggests that Hildegard applies these theoretical insights to the literary form of her books of visions.作者: MERIT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:21
Working with Content and Typography,lfth century. It analyses the allegorical form and the ideas that lie behind it as taking part in several contemporary developments in rethinking biblical exegesis and the question of theological language. Ultimately, I claim that the specific strategies employed by Hildegard in her allegory and all作者: engrave 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:28 作者: Deject 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:47 作者: 摻假 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:50
Dinah WoutersReads Hildegard from a literary viewpoint rather than historical, theological, or spiritual.Takes into account early scholasticism, modern allegorical theory, and questions of language and cognition.O作者: Myosin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:29 作者: Vo2-Max 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:39
Introduction,ough a discussion of her roles as visionary, prophet, and author. The introduction further argues that the study of twelfth-century allegory has been skewed towards Chartrian allegory and the idea of allegorical hermeneutics as a literary theory. The goal of this book is to study Hildegard’s systema作者: paroxysm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:21
Vision and Explanation,dence between the elements of allegory and allegoresis, which create meaning through their relation to each other. The chapter addresses other approaches to the visions, which put the emphasis on symbolism, disparateness, incomprehensibility, and the visual aspect. In contrast, my approach highlight作者: restrain 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:37
Allegory as Form and Concept,legory and allegoresis. The outlines of their literary forms have been obscured by prejudices about their cultural values. The chapter identifies these prejudices and offers an alternative view of the relation between allegory and allegoresis. The second theoretical entanglement is that between form作者: precede 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:16
Exegetical Form: The Eccentric Exegesis of the , suggest that the same formal mechanisms are at work in the allegorical and the exegetical text. Hildegard’s method resembles glossing, but goes beyond the individual gloss in creating a continuous narrative on the level of the sentence, of the single interpretation, and of a series of interpretatio作者: Arthritis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:34
Allegorical form: Narrative, the Cosmos, and the End of Time,and point out a formal difference between parables in the books of visions and in the letters. Second, I look at the special case of the allegorical description of the cosmos. A formal change takes place between similar descriptions in the first and the last book of visions, . and ., which I attribu作者: Instrumental 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:58
Allegorical Cognition through Words,argues that Hildegard participates in the shift of language questions from the domain of biblical exegesis to that of cognition and general epistemology during the period of early scholasticism. At the same time, it makes clear that hermeneutical structures deeply influence how Hildegard thinks abou作者: cardiopulmonary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:00 作者: fiscal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:22
Beliefs about Language and the Construction of Allegorical Form,lfth century. It analyses the allegorical form and the ideas that lie behind it as taking part in several contemporary developments in rethinking biblical exegesis and the question of theological language. Ultimately, I claim that the specific strategies employed by Hildegard in her allegory and all作者: 發(fā)展 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:08
Book 2022nary’s use of allegory and allegorical exegesis is linked to theories of cognition, interpretation, and prophecy. It argues that the form of the allegorical vision is not just the product of a medieval symbolic mentality, but specific to Hildegard’s position and the major transformations taking plac作者: 最有利 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:52
Matt Chiu,Arlindo Silva,Siska Limtic use of allegory both as specific to her unique position as a female visionary, prophet, and author, and as a manifestation of the restructuring of literature and knowledge during the twelfth century.作者: SOW 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:31
Design Computing and Cognition’22ns. Her exegesis is driven by a desire for coherence between single words, phrases, and metaphors and for narrative continuity at a thematic scale. What is left out is the level in between: the narrative continuity of the object text, or exactly what is normally the object of exegesis.作者: 密切關(guān)系 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:05 作者: Anonymous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:27 作者: faucet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:31 作者: leniency 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:18 作者: AMBI 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:22
2945-5936 llegorical theory, and questions of language and cognition.OThis book analyses how the three books of visions by Hildegard of Bingen use the allegorical vision as a form of knowledge. It describes how the visionary’s use of allegory and allegorical exegesis is linked to theories of cognition, interp作者: 幼稚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:08 作者: 構(gòu)想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:43
Kristin A. Bartlett,Jorge D. Cambae prejudices and offers an alternative view of the relation between allegory and allegoresis. The second theoretical entanglement is that between formal and ideological definitions of allegory. I offer a reconciliation of formal definitions of allegory with those approaches that define allegory as a concept, set of ideas, ideology, or aesthetic.作者: Hypomania 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:26 作者: 甜瓜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:10
Working with Content and Typography,ical exegesis and the question of theological language. Ultimately, I claim that the specific strategies employed by Hildegard in her allegory and allegoresis should be regarded as a literary form that self-consciously situates itself within contemporary developments and debates on Scripture, language, and knowledge.作者: 新陳代謝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:53
Vision and Explanation,hes to the visions, which put the emphasis on symbolism, disparateness, incomprehensibility, and the visual aspect. In contrast, my approach highlights the recognisability of exegetical method, the conventionality of the metaphors, and the iterability of the process.作者: enchant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:58
Allegory as Form and Concept,e prejudices and offers an alternative view of the relation between allegory and allegoresis. The second theoretical entanglement is that between formal and ideological definitions of allegory. I offer a reconciliation of formal definitions of allegory with those approaches that define allegory as a concept, set of ideas, ideology, or aesthetic.作者: Overthrow 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:39
