標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Airbus Industrie; Conflict and Coopera Steven McGuire Book 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997 Abstrac [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 公款 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:35
書目名稱Airbus Industrie影響因子(影響力)
作者: 思想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:16
Cooperation in International Political Economy,national cooperation, there is widespread agreement on a working definition.. Cooperation arises, ‘when actors adjust their behaviour to the actual or anticipated preferences of others, through a process of policy coordination’.. Cooperation in the Airbus case should manifest itself as the adjustment of European Community and US trade policies.作者: 博愛(ài)家 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:05
Book 1997 understanding this trade dispute, the author casts light on broader issues of international cooperation by focusing on the bilateral trade negotiations that took place between 1979 and 1992. He considers the role played by aerospace firms, the GATT and the transatlantic alliance in shaping this cooperative outcome.作者: 大火 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:51
Das Management der lernenden Organisationperation in 1970 and throughout the 1980s caused increasing concern among American government and industry officials. Bilateral EC-US trade diplomacy over Airbus resolved the dispute in 1992 with the signing of an agreement governing international trade in civilian aerospace. In essence, we seek to 作者: Inflated 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:17 作者: 防御 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:03 作者: 增減字母法 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:59
Methodische Konzeption der Untersuchung,ts of the A300 including the critical sale to Eastern Airlines, and 2. the admission of the United Kingdom back into the consortium. Second, it explores the first, and often overlooked, arena of US-EC conflict over Airbus, namely, the use of subsidized export finance as a weapon in the struggle for 作者: 贊美者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93417-8de the focus for the trade friction over Airbus — the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft. The Agreement sought to introduce a measure of discipline over government influence on trade in the civil aircraft sector. This process was initiated by the United States government, when President Carte作者: ALIEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:32
Grundlagen des Innovationsmanagements,T accord and regarded it as a good, if not foolproof, agreement protecting US firms from unfair competition. However, the 1980s saw the trade dispute intensify, not subside. By 1982, it was clear that the GATT accord was not going to offer the protection that American firms had hoped. Gradually both作者: albuminuria 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:50
Das Management radikaler Innovationenbus consortium had launched three aircraft programmes (A300, A310 and A320) in relatively quick succession and was now planning to undertake another. It was doing this without any clear indication that the existing programmes were making any money for the consortium. American anger at this developme作者: arthroscopy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81914-7ted States and the European Community modified long standing positions on the Airbus dispute to achieve agreement. The essential trade-off was the EC’s acceptance of limits on direct subsidy in exchange for the American acceptance of discipline on indirect subsidy. The 1992 agreement has not stopped作者: 同位素 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:01 作者: Infinitesimal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:18 作者: 大看臺(tái) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:44
Das Management des Organizational Slacknational cooperation, there is widespread agreement on a working definition.. Cooperation arises, ‘when actors adjust their behaviour to the actual or anticipated preferences of others, through a process of policy coordination’.. Cooperation in the Airbus case should manifest itself as the adjustment of European Community and US trade policies.作者: 吹牛大王 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:09 作者: heartburn 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:01
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997作者: LINES 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:43
Introduction,peration in 1970 and throughout the 1980s caused increasing concern among American government and industry officials. Bilateral EC-US trade diplomacy over Airbus resolved the dispute in 1992 with the signing of an agreement governing international trade in civilian aerospace. In essence, we seek to 作者: 考古學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:12 作者: anaerobic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:30 作者: FLIT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:14 作者: 劇毒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:08
The Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft,de the focus for the trade friction over Airbus — the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft. The Agreement sought to introduce a measure of discipline over government influence on trade in the civil aircraft sector. This process was initiated by the United States government, when President Carte作者: 成績(jī)上升 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:33
,‘Phoney War’: The Launch of the A320,T accord and regarded it as a good, if not foolproof, agreement protecting US firms from unfair competition. However, the 1980s saw the trade dispute intensify, not subside. By 1982, it was clear that the GATT accord was not going to offer the protection that American firms had hoped. Gradually both作者: 倔強(qiáng)不能 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:48
,The Height of Acrimony, 1985–88,bus consortium had launched three aircraft programmes (A300, A310 and A320) in relatively quick succession and was now planning to undertake another. It was doing this without any clear indication that the existing programmes were making any money for the consortium. American anger at this developme作者: 胡言亂語(yǔ) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:09
Negotiating the 1992 Airbus Accord,ted States and the European Community modified long standing positions on the Airbus dispute to achieve agreement. The essential trade-off was the EC’s acceptance of limits on direct subsidy in exchange for the American acceptance of discipline on indirect subsidy. The 1992 agreement has not stopped作者: 執(zhí)拗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:10
Conclusion: Airbus Industrie and International Cooperation, Certainly there would seem to have been good reasons to do so. The US aerospace industry is one of that state’s most important economic sectors; not only is it a key defence sector, its positive balance of trade makes a significant contribution to the US balance of payments. For the European Commun作者: arsenal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:13 作者: languid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:18 作者: Laconic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:09 作者: sinoatrial-node 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:04 作者: 蝕刻 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:08
The Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft,ressure from its domestic industry which was, by 1978, beginning to recognize the dangers of increasing international competition in aerospace. Airbus was not the only competitor on the minds of US executives. Several states, including Brazil, Canada and Japan, were developing formidable aerospace industries.作者: 吸氣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:17 作者: heart-murmur 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:09 作者: foodstuff 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:31
2633-5964 ustrie. By understanding this trade dispute, the author casts light on broader issues of international cooperation by focusing on the bilateral trade negotiations that took place between 1979 and 1992. He considers the role played by aerospace firms, the GATT and the transatlantic alliance in shapin作者: 牙齒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:27
Das Management des Organizational Slackn international collaboration that arises out of the failure of European states to develop successful national strategies to compete with the United States. In the final section, we examine how changes in the international aerospace market from 1970 onward undermined US dominance and, inadvertently, provided Airbus with its opportunity to compete.作者: 使害羞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:33 作者: Vasodilation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:34
Grundlagen des Innovationsmanagements,intensify, not subside. By 1982, it was clear that the GATT accord was not going to offer the protection that American firms had hoped. Gradually both the American industry and government began to regard Europe as guilty of violating both the letter and spirit of the accord by continuing to provide Airbus with subsidies.作者: 說(shuō)笑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:19
Das Management radikaler InnovationenIt was doing this without any clear indication that the existing programmes were making any money for the consortium. American anger at this development was intense. To compound matters, for the first time in the dispute, the proposed Airbus aircraft threatened the viability of a new US project, the MDC MD-11.作者: Neolithic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81914-7s acceptance of limits on direct subsidy in exchange for the American acceptance of discipline on indirect subsidy. The 1992 agreement has not stopped angry words being exchanged between the trading partners, but it has formed the regime around which talks on further disputes can revolve.作者: slow-wave-sleep 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:22 作者: 上坡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:38
,Airbus Expansion and Export Finance, 1970–80,es the first, and often overlooked, arena of US-EC conflict over Airbus, namely, the use of subsidized export finance as a weapon in the struggle for aircraft orders. This dispute led in time to the development of an OECD-sponsored international regime that governs export financing of aircraft.作者: Thyroxine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:24 作者: Anthrp 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:26 作者: 隱士 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:53
