標(biāo)題: Titlebook: After Number 10; Former Prime Ministe Kevin Theakston Book 2010 Kevin Theakston 2010 18th century.comparative.health.politics.Thatcher.Brit [打印本頁] 作者: 嚴(yán)厲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:39
書目名稱After Number 10影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱After Number 10影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱After Number 10網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱After Number 10網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱After Number 10被引頻次
書目名稱After Number 10被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱After Number 10年度引用
書目名稱After Number 10年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱After Number 10讀者反饋
書目名稱After Number 10讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 沙漠 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:29 作者: conference 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:36
Peel to Rosebery,nation to repeal the Corn Laws was the final straw. He pushed his party too far, two-thirds of Tory MPs voting against him, and repeal was carried only with the votes of Liberals and Radicals. When vengeful rebels then voted with the Liberals to defeat him on an Irish bill, Peel resigned and Lord Jo作者: Traumatic-Grief 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:36
Attlee to Douglas-Home, general election only narrowly, polling more votes than the Conservatives who had only a small 17-seat majority. Attlee had high approval ratings and was an undoubted electoral asset. The Conservatives might not last long, it was thought, and the pendulum might swing in Labour’s direction sooner ra作者: humectant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:58 作者: Homocystinuria 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:09 作者: ORBIT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:08 作者: Geyser 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:26
Thatcher to Blair,resignations, the loss of by-elections and a fall in the opinion polls had eroded her support within her party and made her seem a massive electoral liability. She is the only prime minister in modern times, in peacetime and in good health to have been forcibly ejected from office by her own party.作者: Corporeal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-256-4ng this period did his reputation little good at the time and for long afterwards. He was attacked in verse by Shelley as like a viper or a vulture, as ‘hypocrisy on a crocodile’, while government spies sent back reports on the radical poet to him as a Home Secretary who almost revelled in his unpopularity as a sign he was doing his job properly.作者: AVANT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:47
2947-4221 the first book to look at the lives,?political roles and influence of former prime ministers, Theakston?analyzes all the former prime ministers from Walpole in the 18th century to Blair today.978-1-349-30031-0978-0-230-28138-7Series ISSN 2947-4221 Series E-ISSN 2947-423X 作者: 難取悅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-256-4e at the same time, and there are currently just three living ‘members’ of the ‘club’ (Lady Thatcher, Sir John Major and Tony Blair). This book explores the experience of former prime ministers in Britain from the 18th century to the present day. What do they do after leaving the topmost office in British government?作者: 改變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:20 作者: famine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-256-4and the ground except a thousand feet of thin air. Although he was determined to carry on, he was not going to be able to defy the laws of gravity and escape the fate of other unsuccessful premiers and party leaders.作者: 虛弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:14 作者: 語言學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:10 作者: sebaceous-gland 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:58
Salisbury to Asquith,his age and in poor health. He had first served as a Cabinet minister 36 years earlier and had been at the top of his party for 20 years. Imperturbable and remote, he had come to seem a fixed part of the political landscape, what Curzon called ‘that strange, powerful, inscrutable and brilliant obstructive deadweight at the top’.作者: remission 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:11 作者: 不自然 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:40
Comparative Perspectives,the backing of their party, or (more rarely) one who chooses to call it a day and voluntarily quits. Just as in Britain, there is no fixed or predetermined role — they have to work it out for themselves, and what they do depends very much on personal choices and on circumstances.作者: 鞠躬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:44 作者: 耕種 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:27 作者: Outwit 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:18 作者: 嚴(yán)峻考驗(yàn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:23 作者: 不朽中國 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:13 作者: 神刊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:14
Addington to Melbourne,other 40 years (only Grafton lived longer after being PM). During that time he held ministerial office for a total of 14 years and served in the Cabinets of four of his successors in Number 10 (on both counts no one else has equalled this achievement). However, his stance as an arch reactionary duri作者: ineptitude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:14
Peel to Rosebery,e as prime minister 1841–46 (having earlier had a brief four-month spell as PM in 1835–36) but he was a quintessential man of government and an executive politician, and was neglectful of the political and personal arts of party management. A cold, remote and high-handed leader, he rather took his b作者: 過濾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:25 作者: 漸強(qiáng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:10 作者: 剛開始 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:19 作者: 繁殖 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:25
Heath to Callaghan,Heath was the political equivalent of those cartoon characters who run off the edge of a cliff but do not realise there is nothing between their feet and the ground except a thousand feet of thin air. Although he was determined to carry on, he was not going to be able to defy the laws of gravity and作者: 爵士樂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:17 作者: Nausea 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:38
Comparative Perspectives,esident — obliged to leave office because they have lost an election, or come to the end of their constitutionally-fixed term, or fallen ill, or lost the backing of their party, or (more rarely) one who chooses to call it a day and voluntarily quits. Just as in Britain, there is no fixed or predeter作者: canvass 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:58 作者: excrete 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:03
https://doi.org/10.1057/978023028138718th century; comparative; health; politics; Thatcher; British Politics作者: bibliophile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:18 作者: 水獺 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:35 作者: 減弱不好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-256-4 February 1742. He had already ceased to be an MP, having a few days earlier accepted a peerage and been created Earl of Orford. He had also obtained from the King a pension of ￡4,000 a year (worth over ￡450,000 a year in today’s money), though Walpole chose not to apply for his first payment for tw作者: 文藝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-256-4other 40 years (only Grafton lived longer after being PM). During that time he held ministerial office for a total of 14 years and served in the Cabinets of four of his successors in Number 10 (on both counts no one else has equalled this achievement). However, his stance as an arch reactionary duri作者: BULLY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-256-4e as prime minister 1841–46 (having earlier had a brief four-month spell as PM in 1835–36) but he was a quintessential man of government and an executive politician, and was neglectful of the political and personal arts of party management. A cold, remote and high-handed leader, he rather took his b作者: collagen 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-256-4months (1885-86, 1886–92, 1895–1902), the fourth-longest cumulative tenure and a record not equalled since then. He was 72, depressed, weary, feeling his age and in poor health. He had first served as a Cabinet minister 36 years earlier and had been at the top of his party for 20 years. Imperturbabl作者: Grandstand 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:41 作者: 某人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-256-4, and he had been leader of the Labour Party for 16 years (since 1935). He was 68 years old, exhausted after 11 gruelling years in government, and had been hospitalised twice while prime minister, in 1948 and 1951, suffering from duodenal ulcers. It might have been thought a good moment to step down作者: 文字 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:18 作者: IRK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:54 作者: 歸功于 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37152-3esident — obliged to leave office because they have lost an election, or come to the end of their constitutionally-fixed term, or fallen ill, or lost the backing of their party, or (more rarely) one who chooses to call it a day and voluntarily quits. Just as in Britain, there is no fixed or predeter
