標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method; Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc Cohen Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) [打印本頁] 作者: 自由 時間: 2025-3-21 18:34
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method被引頻次
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method年度引用
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method讀者反饋
書目名稱Why Plato Lost Interest in the Socratic Method讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 盡管 時間: 2025-3-21 23:17 作者: Angiogenesis 時間: 2025-3-22 04:21 作者: Antagonist 時間: 2025-3-22 08:23
Gareth B. Matthewshe production function, and general equilibrium. These issues were argued professionally from the 1930s to the 1950s, mainly by mathematicians and physicists. The most fundamental of these seems to be the demand law. Many economists have been unable to find a consistently self-contained model either作者: 音樂會 時間: 2025-3-22 11:16 作者: Discrete 時間: 2025-3-22 13:27 作者: chalice 時間: 2025-3-22 17:02
Gareth B. Matthewsvolve to achieve sustained success.?The world is being transformed by Digital. The pace of change is constantly accelerating and volatility and complexity are the new norms. Digital leaders are at the forefront of these waves of change, creating new markets and transforming traditional ones..This bo作者: BLINK 時間: 2025-3-22 21:28 作者: 胖人手藝好 時間: 2025-3-23 02:11 作者: 是限制 時間: 2025-3-23 07:41
http://image.papertrans.cn/w/image/1028161.jpg作者: 充氣球 時間: 2025-3-23 11:21 作者: Tinea-Capitis 時間: 2025-3-23 16:49 作者: 沉著 時間: 2025-3-23 21:09 作者: 涂掉 時間: 2025-3-24 01:18
Gareth B. Matthews,S. Marc CohenSocratic method of questioning and refutation (elenchus) predominates the early Platonic dialogues.Early dialogues were intended to commemorate Socrates and the elenchus.Uncovering the shortcomings th作者: 徹底檢查 時間: 2025-3-24 03:01
The Socratic Method, so-called Socratic elenchus. This is a species of philosophical analysis whose aim is to arrive at the definition of a problematic concept by means of subjecting alternative proposals to potential refutation by means of counterexample. Six key features of the method are delineated.作者: 蕨類 時間: 2025-3-24 10:01
Analyzing Courage: ,, but Socrates shows them all to be defective. Their efforts end in perplexity, leading us to wonder whether the elenchus, as a form of inquiry, holds out a serious prospect of leading to the discovery of what courage is.作者: allergy 時間: 2025-3-24 13:50
Blameworthy Ignorance: ,are so dismal? We might hope to find an answer in the .. There we find a possible motivation for the elenchus in a principle of “epistemic purity”—the idea that one ought not to think one knows something that, in fact, one does not know.作者: Reclaim 時間: 2025-3-24 17:10
Virtue in Socratic Ignorance: , will ever be entirely satisfactory? The . may provide an answer, for it raises the possibility that the virtue that is the topic of this dialogue, . (self-mastery), may actually turn out to be the limited wisdom that Socrates claims to have, namely, self-knowledge.作者: 癡呆 時間: 2025-3-24 20:47 作者: 倔強不能 時間: 2025-3-25 00:36
Conclusion,re are both internal and external limitations in what the elenchus can be reasonably expected to accomplish. And Plato also thought that philosophy can do more to get beyond those limitations. Only by going beyond the elenctic method will we be able to adequately address the foundational questions of philosophy.作者: 反復(fù)無常 時間: 2025-3-25 07:23
is no difference between cooperation and refusal, and the same is true for risk taking. A situation of expected maximization of utility gives infinite equilibria. Our interest is to find a way to heaven from the other possible situations. This chapters is concerned with how an actual player would r作者: 錯事 時間: 2025-3-25 07:32 作者: Delude 時間: 2025-3-25 14:28
Gareth B. Matthewsitative finality, in principle beyond all criticism and reappraisal. It is the fact that the core of Darwin’s theory is a compulsive deductive argument which makes it possible to misplace the idea of necessity, and then perhaps to mistake its character: where a conclusion follows necessarily it can 作者: 小卷發(fā) 時間: 2025-3-25 18:11
Gareth B. Matthewsion activities may be missed. There are many aspects to consider, including the inter-connected factors between different income classes and household demands. Household demand includes some items that are so indispensable that demand for them is unaffected by price. Ignoring price levels, people wo作者: 斑駁 時間: 2025-3-25 22:59 作者: 評論者 時間: 2025-3-26 01:50
Gareth B. Matthewsl leaders with more than 400 years of combined experience.Use the four steps of the Unnatural Selection framework to facilitate your personal evolution and digital leadership success.Demystify what makes people tick using the Human Full Stack, which is a model analogous to the technical full stack, 作者: 巧辦法 時間: 2025-3-26 08:00
h, Brutus’ transformation is . remarkable. Stoicism may view death as something to be philosophized away, but actual bereavement leaves a deep mark in flesh and blood. To this second group of critics, the Roman’s recovery is therefore not to be trusted. Either he has not suffered as deeply as he app作者: Directed 時間: 2025-3-26 09:42 作者: APNEA 時間: 2025-3-26 13:15
Gareth B. Matthewsar viscoelasticity with or without thermal effects. It gives a very natural and mature extension of the usual semigroup approach to a more general class of infinite-dimensional978-3-0348-0498-1978-3-0348-0499-8Series ISSN 2197-1803 Series E-ISSN 2197-1811 作者: 解開 時間: 2025-3-26 18:53
The Socratic Method, so-called Socratic elenchus. This is a species of philosophical analysis whose aim is to arrive at the definition of a problematic concept by means of subjecting alternative proposals to potential refutation by means of counterexample. Six key features of the method are delineated.作者: 裁決 時間: 2025-3-26 22:42 作者: Fulsome 時間: 2025-3-27 02:25 作者: frozen-shoulder 時間: 2025-3-27 05:52
Virtue in Socratic Ignorance: , will ever be entirely satisfactory? The . may provide an answer, for it raises the possibility that the virtue that is the topic of this dialogue, . (self-mastery), may actually turn out to be the limited wisdom that Socrates claims to have, namely, self-knowledge.作者: labile 時間: 2025-3-27 11:41 作者: coalition 時間: 2025-3-27 17:30
Forms Left Unanalyzed: ,not want his readers to think that the elenchus is hopeless as a way to arrive at a satisfactory philosophical analysis, it is notable that the elenchus does not play a role in the elucidation of this theory. This strongly suggests that Plato has come to see that the elenchus alone is insufficient a作者: 結(jié)構(gòu) 時間: 2025-3-27 21:43
,Downgrading the Elenchus: , I–II, I as a standard elenchus. Rather, Plato wants to show that the classic elenchus depends on assumptions that will not always be met. And in . II, he makes it clear that the classic elenchus will be powerless against a well-worked out philosophical theory offered by a sophisticated professional. What作者: Flavouring 時間: 2025-3-28 00:47 作者: 吃掉 時間: 2025-3-28 02:24 作者: Receive 時間: 2025-3-28 10:10 作者: JADED 時間: 2025-3-28 11:27 作者: POINT 時間: 2025-3-28 18:24
Book 2023and late dialogues Plato went beyond Socrates to present his own mature philosophical thought. In this book, Matthews revises this explanation by uncovering the shortcomings that Plato came to find in the Socratic method and the reasons why Plato lost interest in it.作者: Scintillations 時間: 2025-3-28 21:20
,Downgrading the Elenchus: , I–II,akes it clear that the classic elenchus will be powerless against a well-worked out philosophical theory offered by a sophisticated professional. What will be required is a superior alternative theory. And that is just what Plato offers in the rest of the ..作者: 金盤是高原 時間: 2025-3-29 00:46
Philosophy Professionalized: ,wn. This new method also seems to provide Plato with a response to the Targeting Requirement that has so far been lacking. And it leads to the consideration of some fundamental questions in the philosophy of language, and hence to the professionalization of philosophy.
